Goverment concession to force the green paper through

daveyyyyyyyyyyyy
daveyyyyyyyyyyyy Online Community Member Posts: 23 Contributor
edited June 27 in PIP, DLA, ADP and AA

Hi, from what I have read tonight in The Guardian, the government are offering the backbench rebels a new watered-down green paper where the cuts will only apply to new claimants, so what does this mean? If you currently have a 5-year award, you won't be touched?, but once your review is due, you will be? Or does it mean you are protected here in in if you are a long-term current claimer? It's very confusing, all this.

ยซ1

Comments

  • Siwheels73
    Siwheels73 Scope Member Posts: 752 Pioneering

    Also, what happens to those like me, who are still on DLA, but are fearing being asked to transfer to PIP? The changes being spoken about on the TV tonight make me feel that my lifelong disability will mean nothing when it comes to the change.

  • kreacher
    kreacher Online Community Member Posts: 320 Empowering

    this is how i read it, people who are currently claiming disability payments will keep there benefits but people who are about to claim who have never claimed before will have new measures

    thats how i have read it

  • William01
    William01 Online Community Member Posts: 25 Connected

    That's my understanding of it as well. Also i assume as current claimants, when uts time to review pip award, as its still a current claim, we won't have to meet the atleast 4 points in one descriptor to qualify for daily component. What I'm not sure about is there's something about Starmer agreeing for minister over reforming the eligibility criteria to work with disabled activists - will this new criteria also apply to existing claimants when it comes to reviewing pip, completing and ESA/UC 50? Also is the contribution based ESA saved?

  • DFDone
    DFDone Online Community Member Posts: 48 Connected

    at least there is movement in a positive way

  • Girl_No1
    Girl_No1 Online Community Member Posts: 407 Trailblazing

    As always with government, the devil will be in the detail.

    They're still attempting to ram this through in a shortened timeframe, and as a money bill.

    That means scrutiny will be minimal, so we need knowledgeable MPs to be on the ball for all the sneaky wording/tricks the likes of Starmer/Reeves/Kendall will attempt.

    This is where the unions need to really step up and refuse to finance them. If this u-turn can be taken at face value, it's those who are currently healthy/employed who will be affected by this "new" proposal if when they become ill/disabled.

  • sarah_lea12
    sarah_lea12 Online Community Member Posts: 409 Empowering

    I hope this is right because I just got my review award and have enhanced on both but no 4 points in daily living . I struggle like most here with anxiety and PIP reviews make my mental health so bad and it's bad to start with , so this would be amazing.

  • daveyyyyyyyyyyyy
    daveyyyyyyyyyyyy Online Community Member Posts: 23 Contributor
  • daveyyyyyyyyyyyy
    daveyyyyyyyyyyyy Online Community Member Posts: 23 Contributor

    Well it is a move in the right direction then and and if true will safeguard existing claimants

  • daveyyyyyyyyyyyy
    daveyyyyyyyyyyyy Online Community Member Posts: 23 Contributor

    Don't quite understand the meaning of your last bit sorry

  • Zipz
    Zipz Online Community Member Posts: 3,507 Championing

    Existing claimants? Isn't that an I'm all right, Jack attitude? People out there are terrified for the future of their disabled children.

  • Bingo
    Bingo Online Community Member Posts: 76 Contributor
    edited June 27

    That is at least how it appears to read but I don't see how that could work fairly. It would mean someone who doesn't score a 4 now in one category but is already in receipt of benefits continuing to receive them but someone who suddenly find themselves in exactly the same state of disability but is a new claimant not qualifying. Surely when you have to fill out all your forms every four years they will treat them all the same. As new claims.

  • daveyyyyyyyyyyyy
    daveyyyyyyyyyyyy Online Community Member Posts: 23 Contributor

    No, not at all; it's far from an 'I am alright, Jack' attitude. It was merely a question I asked in relation to the government decision to back down on some aspects of the green paper, which would affect me. If that is an 'I am alright, Jack' attitude, then so be it, but just for the record, I don't agree with any of these cuts, and I think it is disgusting what Starmer and the government are trying to do, and I personally think the whole proposed bill should be scrapped altogether.

  • daveyyyyyyyyyyyy
    daveyyyyyyyyyyyy Online Community Member Posts: 23 Contributor

    Hi, no, from what I can gather, you would have protection; your review would be assessed on the old points scoring system and not the new proposed one. Hope this helps.

  • Bingo
    Bingo Online Community Member Posts: 76 Contributor

    So on the old points system you did not need to score a 4 then so you would still qualify if a long term existing claimant? As it happens I do score a 4 in one area but its just a flick of a pen at assessment I guess to downgrade that. If you are right then that should not matter for me I think you are saying. Whilst that makes me less worried personally it hardly seems fair to others.

  • daveyyyyyyyyyyyy
    daveyyyyyyyyyyyy Online Community Member Posts: 23 Contributor

    Hi, yes, from what I can gather, this would be correct; existing claimants would be reviewed using the existing system that was originally used to assess them. And yes, hardly good news for new claimants. This whole attacking the disabled is disgusting to the core, and none of it should even be being considered in the first place.

  • sarah_lea12
    sarah_lea12 Online Community Member Posts: 409 Empowering

    wondering what will be taken off the pip review form , they are talking about removing the eating and bathing daily living , will there a different form for existing and new claimants with a different set of questions on eating and bathing . Hope they are not going to be sneaky with this so we still do not qualify ?

  • daveyyyyyyyyyyyy
    daveyyyyyyyyyyyy Online Community Member Posts: 23 Contributor

    Let's hope not. Personally, I wouldn't trust any of them as far as I could throw them.

  • sarah_lea12
    sarah_lea12 Online Community Member Posts: 409 Empowering

    Neither do I , but in my defence it was only 5.55 and I'd just woken up ๐Ÿ˜

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 1,009 Championing
    edited June 27

    Its a shame we still have people who dont understand how it was going to work.

    So basically the original idea is your original award would be honoured, but come your first review after Autumn 2026, you would have been assessed under the new criteria.

    The change means now all your future reviews (at least until the next set of welfare reforms inevitable after a government change) will be under the criteria that we have now, so no 4 point descriptor requirement.

    I also agree with the earlier posters, dont trust this party leadership at all, especially Reeve and Kendall, the only thing confirmed is that the 4 points change is whats being amended, but there is further PIP descriptor changes planned later to come, I havent read anything yet that says this change will apply to that as well.

This discussion has been closed.