Scope's reply to the governments planned concessions to the green paper.

Options
1383941434456

Comments

  • sarah_lea12
    sarah_lea12 Online Community Member Posts: 397 Empowering

    well if they just accepted the u turn that new claimants only would be affected then we wouldn't be back to square 1. Benefits rules change and I wasn't able to claim old style esa but had to claim UC and the health element , but now the bill has been passed and we are tortured again with the anxiety of not knowing , maybe to try and kill a few more of us off .

  • mawempathy
    mawempathy Online Community Member Posts: 150 Empowering
    edited July 1

    I think they still have a blank cheque to do what they want after Timms review on assessments, activities and descriptors. But the bill isn’t final yet. MP’s are seemingly demanding more detail on the review before next weeks third reading and vote.

    Still hope the speaker won’t let this sail through as a money bill next week, too. If he doesn’t designate it a money bill, the Lords can put a ton of scrutiny on every line in the bill if they want, and effectively force amendments.

    So July 9th next week is when the third reading happens, short debate and then vote.

  • sarah_lea12
    sarah_lea12 Online Community Member Posts: 397 Empowering

    we were okay until the MP's wanted more so now we are punished , they passed it and its what they wanted . Simms will review it and then we will all need to get four points , just as they wanted .

  • Tumilty
    Tumilty Online Community Member Posts: 317 Empowering

    Yes seemed to go ok, nice assessor, made me at ease, couldn't understand a few questions even though simple questions.

  • geckobat
    geckobat Online Community Member Posts: 167 Empowering
    edited July 1

    Sorry, but I don't think we were okay at all. Nothing was secure or clear, it was a mess and still is. None of it is reform, it's just cuts and spite. I think they were always going to punish us.

  • mawempathy
    mawempathy Online Community Member Posts: 150 Empowering

    MP’s are demanding more clarity on the review before next week’s third reading and vote (July 9th). I’m hopeful they will force the government to limit the scope with another concession.
    4 points is just a technicality anyway. They could always make it twice as hard to get 2 points in the descriptors, and thus in real terms it’s 4 points for everyone.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 2,042 Championing

    Did anyone here listen to their ramblings ? Was ME mentioned regarding the Timms report ?

  • tcellmutation
    tcellmutation Online Community Member Posts: 341 Empowering

    I don't think anyone knows what has passed and what has not...

  • Tumilty
    Tumilty Online Community Member Posts: 317 Empowering

    Thanks I'll try to remember that when happens. I know my rent price but didn't keep my service charge letter..I'll login to my northern counties account but they often good wi that stuff.

  • Andi66
    Andi66 Online Community Member Posts: 982 Championing

    So what does this mean for us who are already on pip. And for us who yet to be moved to UC .Also when we get reassessed do we have to abide by the 4 point rule

  • geckobat
    geckobat Online Community Member Posts: 167 Empowering
    edited July 1

    I think regardless of how any of this turns out, we can only be sure of one thing, that they're going to make it a lot harder for all of us, current or future.

  • hallac
    hallac Online Community Member Posts: 30 Contributor

    I don’t want to sound doom and gloom but who would you vote in the next general election? Reform? Conservatives? Really are the two who would stand any chance and both would be worse than labour unfortunately.

  • Passerby
    Passerby Posts: 762 Championing

    As it'll ask you for a username to open a UC account, to start with, don't bother about fancy or nice names, it'll keep saying to you that such a username is in use. Imagine, millions of claimants are on their system. I tried with all sorts of names, including the names of some of the smallest stars in the Milky Way, in vain! This was really what took my time, until I recalled the French name of my dog when I was living in France ages ago, and bang.

  • sarah_lea12
    sarah_lea12 Online Community Member Posts: 397 Empowering

    The four points have been removed from the bill , so I understand , Timms will review it in November 2026, that is what I understand .

  • Andi66
    Andi66 Online Community Member Posts: 982 Championing

    This Timms bill they were referring to what is it?

    Also what about UC

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 2,042 Championing

    Hi chiaried,

    Did you happen to watch the debate at all today? I ask as it was mentioned that an mp mentioned serious conditions and ME. I didn’t watch it and can’t find anything online

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,122 Championing

    Oh maybe your hear some good news have you got the severe part of esa

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,122 Championing

    I think we will all be doing alot of emailing this week really has to be done i heard that speaker friendly with starmer

  • AppleJacks
    AppleJacks Online Community Member Posts: 67 Empowering

    Labour's Mary Kelly Foy told MPs: "I popped out for a banana earlier on and, when I came back in, things had changed again. So I'm even more unclear on what I'm voting on."

    After the vote had taken place, Labour's Ian Lavery told the BBC: "This is an absolute shambles. I've never seen anything like it."

    Both the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives criticised the process and said the bill should be pulled entirely.

    The government initially announced its plans for a shake-up of the benefits system in March, including measures to limit eligibility for Pip, the main disability benefit in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and freeze the health-related element of universal credit.

This discussion has been closed.