The Universal Credit Bill becomes law. Here are the changes to disability benefits you need to know

Yes while I agree the Bond Solon Rules are not Statutory Law, as you state, the Content that they are based on is.

When an Expert witness makes a statement whether in court, a tribunal or to be used as supporting evidence, (An assessment report.) by a Decision Maker then the same rules apply.

Bond Solon is used in Insurance cases where a report is written by the Doctor in a specific field to mitigate liability. i.e. A whiplash claim for 6 people who were in the car at the time, when the car had 2 people in their and the Cam footage is used for instance to prove it was fact.

ALL, supporting evidence is used, perhapse not a good example, but the theory is there. That statement has to have supporting evidence and be signed and dated with the expertise of the writer. You cannot generalise by saying disability analystic expert, because it does not state in what?

My point being when in court and asking what medical body does the expert belong to and were they registered at the time of the report, need clarity, most, infact all I have seen, and I have been doing this in court for over 15 years, (Also work related accident Tribunals) rely on the fact that the company is registered to assess people, and have a blanket certificate to state that ALL their assessors are registered.

"What they don't tell you is they are registered with the company that employs them, and the criteria is different."

One application I had was have you had any assessment experience before? Can you write a report that we can see? "Job Done" Lip service for the "service we should get and do get are miles apart.

We all know the rules that govern assessment. We all know what we need to do to make a claim for Disability benefits. So why is it that the only people that don't follow the rules are the people administering the rules for entitlement? Afterall, they were supposed to agree the terms through negotiation, before it has become law or is put into a charter that we receive.

Why do we as a community have to fight to get anything for the disability community? Are we inventing the wheel? NO. A I is the newest thing, but when you ask A I to explain a report written by an assessment company for the DWP or PIP, it throws a wobbly, because it realises that the person who inputted the answers will not know the answer or has been told " I am sorry, but I have limited capabilities and am unable to answer your question. Might I suggest you contact the company direct and ask them."

When asked what the telephone number is, the reply is, "It should be shown in the top right hand of any correspondence you have received."

BIG BROTHER is watching you, since I have believe it or not had an arguement with A I and I won't name which ones for altering the txt of documents I write, that ask specific questions, yet when looking at the final draft, bares no resemblence to the original.

Today I filled out a PIP review for one claimant, introudcing new evidence and asking why you had not sent me your supporting evidence before you reduced her rate, and that you are also not acknoleging I am her Appointee and showed you the registration you sent me 4 years ago.

Occ Heath wrote a report, which I sent again to them with my comments, and last week Management reduced her hours and starting times and the amount of breaks she should have, because Management decided different to what I and the Occ Heralth recomended to get her back into work.

This was done by agreement, which is now back in place, and already is showing a benefit to her, where she is now working a 20hour a week over 4 days giving her 3 clear days to rest before the next part of the rota starts again.

Yes its common sense, but why don't we get common sense? If I can sort this out, why can't they? I have never not agreed to an assessment, what I have disagreed with is if my assessment is done by the NHS to get me treatment, then why do I need another to get the benefits I am entitled to?

look up how much an assessment costs and see where that money is going. This is not new, since when ATOS were doing it it was £850 + rework costs. Ask Boris and Ian Dunken Smith to name some. That money is our money paid to an assessment company hired by the DWP to assess me for access to Financial Help only. And that's another story as to why when I asked Capita to put their Assessment Report into my medical history they would not.

So I asked the court to place that report onto my medical history so that people that actually treat me can see, and all hell broke out saying I had no right putting that report into my medical history as the report was written for the Decision Maker NOT ME.

Any report held on computer about me, I should have access to. Does the NHS work that way, before administering medication or an operation?