Motability drops luxury cars

Fuzzy200
Fuzzy200 Online Community Member Posts: 51 Empowering
ยซ1

Comments

  • Wibbles
    Wibbles Online Community Member Posts: 3,425 Championing
    edited November 2025

    This depends on what their definition of LUXURY car means ?

    If it means "the automatic version" - which tends to mean the higher spec version of a car - then NO.

    Because many disabled drivers (myself included) have switched to automatics from manuals from necessity - and this will cut down our choice of cars dramatically.

    OK Lexus, Merc, Audi, BMW and AlfaRomeo have been removed - but Volvo is still available !!

  • edithluna
    edithluna Online Community Member Posts: 7 Listener

    yes it would be good to have that broken downโ€ฆ.see what this actually means in terms of what they class as a luxury.

  • edithluna
    edithluna Online Community Member Posts: 7 Listener

    I found this from motility. Sone of it seems fair enough. Theyโ€™ve cut convertibles which is reasonable.
    But they want people to use British cars which is a nice idea but when youโ€™re looking for a car as a disabled driver, the nationality of a car is the last of your priorities!! seems like theyโ€™re using disabled drivers to boost their economic rhetoric which is pretty shameful!
    https://news.motability.co.uk/scheme-news/updates-to-the-cars-available-on-the-motability-scheme/

  • Wibbles
    Wibbles Online Community Member Posts: 3,425 Championing
    edited November 2025

    British cars - doesn't leave many options - does it ?

    Mini Coopers - hardly a disabled friendly car - can't even get a folded up wheelchair in one

    Nissan Juke / Qashqai

    Suzuki Swace

    Toyota Auris, Auris Hybrid and Avensis

    And that's it - of "normal" cars !

    Apart from Ariel Atoms, Lotus etc and such and of course Rolls Royce !!

  • edithluna
    edithluna Online Community Member Posts: 7 Listener

    it says- You may have seen we announced yesterday an ambitious new commitment: from 2035, half of all vehicles leased through the Scheme will be British built.

    You may have noticed that weโ€™ve taken cars from brands such asย Alfa Romeo, Audi, Thereโ€™sย still plenty of choiceย 

    Youโ€™llย still find a wide range of cars to suitย different needsย and budgets:ย 

    • More thanย 840ย vehicles from around 30 different manufacturersย 
    • Around 40 vehicles with no Advance Payment and almost 100 with an Advance Payment under ยฃ500ย 
    • The sameย choiceย of largerย 7 seaterย cars, available from 10ย different manufacturers ย ย 

    Weโ€™llย keep reviewing the range to make sure it continues to meetย ourย disabledย customersโ€™ย needsย andย representsย the best value we can offer.ย 

    โ€ฆ.There does seem to be a decent amount of choices there still I think.

  • Stellar
    Stellar Online Community Member Posts: 409 Pioneering

    Motability is obviously changing this policy purely because of the ableist moral panic neoliberal politicians and media rags have perpetrated towards them for months. Anyone who believes otherwise is clearly not paying attention.

    The fact of the matter is the design of some of the "luxury" cars have vital accessibility needs that are almost impossible to find on other vehicles, most notably their height. Because many disabled people cannot get in and out of low level cars independently.

    There won't be any exemptions, and if there are, they'll be so full of holes, they'll be almost impossible to utilise. Neoliberal slaves to capital (like Rachel Reeves) and related eugenicists alike won't permit it. They would rather disabled people not exist.

    Also the 2nd paragraph is a classic example of the mental gymnastics government ministers and the ableist public alike use to justify cuts to disability benefits.

  • rubin16
    rubin16 Scope Member Posts: 1,463 Championing

    Where I said this:

    "But currently I do see motorbility does get abused alot, which in turn ruins it for genuine parties."

    It wasn't to fuel abilism or to agree with any government. Just simply I have personally seen motorbility being abused. I know a few people who abuse it. One person I know rents their motorbility car to someone for a few months when they can't use it. Also I have known people and instances whereby people only apply for PIP just for the motorbility element so they can get a new car.

  • Nightcity
    Nightcity Online Community Member Posts: 692 Pioneering

    I don't even drive, But absolutely sick of healthy people spreading their hateful dross I popped on to two social media sites to edit and make some posts for my radio station (don't have personal social media atm) and on both the first thing that popped up was some vile rodent banging on about the disabled and motability.

    The first "delight" suggested all those with a motorbility car should have scrounger painted on it, in which recovery in the bin replied with a word I'm not fond of but fits them well (although I think answering them is unwise)

    on the other some other delight suggested blowing the cars up.

    I am now going to send an email to the big players in government, making it clear they are to blame for this along with their msm friends

    convincing clowns into blaming our community for their own problems, it's got to stop.

  • Kimi87
    Kimi87 Online Community Member Posts: 8,694 Championing

    PIP fraud is so low that statistically it's considered to be non existent.

    Any Motability fraud should be reported to Motability.

  • rubin16
    rubin16 Scope Member Posts: 1,463 Championing

    I couldn't even report them as one is my nans friend, and then the other is family.

  • jonf
    jonf Online Community Member Posts: 391 Pioneering

    I am not old enough to drive a Volvo but fancy the v60 estate

  • rubin16
    rubin16 Scope Member Posts: 1,463 Championing

    You could be 90 and still not old enough for a Volvo.

  • Stellar
    Stellar Online Community Member Posts: 409 Pioneering

    because stripping disabled people of their independence is fundamentally a eugenicist policy.

    your anecdotes are not representative of the actual situation. not to mention what you said lines up with government narratives.

  • rubin16
    rubin16 Scope Member Posts: 1,463 Championing

    I don't care what it lines up with, just stating what i've personally witnessed from people in my life.

  • rubin16
    rubin16 Scope Member Posts: 1,463 Championing

    Its more lying and saying stuff that isn't true in order to obtain a car.

    Like theres no problem with being given Pip, but the person in question purposely said things on their app to secure points for the sole reason they could get a free car. When they don't even have the conditions they said.

  • Wibbles
    Wibbles Online Community Member Posts: 3,425 Championing

    Now, we're talking, Allegro's are superior to Marinas

  • kitsmum
    kitsmum Online Community Member Posts: 138 Empowering

    it would appear that quite a few people assume that if you have a blue badge then you have a motability car which is not the case. Therefore, some of these so called luxury cars have been bought outright by the person with disabilities. A lot of people with disabilities work and can afford to buy a car. I have a 10 year old SUV which suits my needs and was bought before I became chronically ill, however it might be that because I have a blue badge and an SUV it must be a motability car.

  • OverlyAnxious
    OverlyAnxious Online Community Member Posts: 5,865 Championing

    The A3 is an awful car. Surely that's not being classed as luxury? I had one for a few months, was glad to be rid of it!