Disabled and sick forced to work.

24

Comments

  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Online Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 3,875 Championing

    Woodbine, the problem is that filling in a new claim form makes you a new claimant in the machine which or may not gather data 

    The other problem is that Housing Benefit used to paid paid 4 weeks in advance then 2 weeks in advance - under UC the housing element is paid to landlords 8/10/12 weeks after a claim is started 


  • Albus_Scope
    Albus_Scope Posts: 9,714 Scope Online Community Coordinator
    And as for the workers of the working class, you will find most of them claiming a myriad of benefits so as to not want to bother going back to work. 

    I'd counter and say many people are having to claim benefits as their wages are too low and the cost of living is now so high.  
  • just4once
    just4once Scope Member Posts: 111 Empowering
    I would much prefer to work and have structure and routine and always have done I was bought up to work from a young age when I was working I paid into the company pension scheme to help later in life but now the future looks bleak I am fed up on benefits struggling and having no choice about it either and state pension at 67 unless that’s gone by then too who knows for sure as for pip we all know the battles involved with that and they can stop it at anytime for a (review) been through this process twice just adding further stress and frustration 



  • honestjon
    honestjon Online Community Member Posts: 173 Empowering
    I cannot believe some of the comments that it is not true. It is true and disabled people are going to be forced to work. I just don't understand why they are picking on disabled people. Let's look at it more closely. 1) we are wasting £6 million a day housing migrants who have never put in the system, where is this money coming from? 2) we are paying the french to stop the boats coming in and to save lives, the french are sitting on their hands, where has that money come from? 3) we wasted money on the go out and eat out, where did that money come from? 4) the government wasted money on contracts during Covid, where did that money come from?

    So, I would like to know why they are picking on disabled people. I have read lots of reports which have stated that this is going to cause some disabled people to become homeless, others have said it could result in people trying to take their own lives.

    I am really puzzled why they are doing this. I would love to work and miss work but i am not physically able to do it, and i take exception that i am going to be forced into pain to try and do it and then lose the job within a day because i cannot do it.

    This is not just a conservative plan. Labour want the conservatives to bring it in so they are not the bad guys but they do back it. An MP for Labour was on Sky News who said they agree with disabled people returning to work.
    Obviously there will be all manner of disabilities that will make it impossible to go back to work.
    They are looking at those claiming UC who are saying that they are too ill/disabled to do any work whatsoever.
    Obviously they won't take the claimant's word for it. I don't see anything wrong with the DWP looking at every UC claimant to see who could do some work. They are talking about removing the 50metre distance rule that if you can't move that distance then you are currently written off. Rubbish, I can think of many jobs where you either work from home or in an office that you are not expected to walk that distance all day long.
    Surely people should be looking at doing something with their lives?
    It is better that they match the job to the individual taking into account reasonable changes to make it happen.
    Me, I'm a great believer that work is good for you even though you will probably not get that much more in wages and UC (taking into account the expenses of working) than being on UC full time. Money isn't the issue what is is the feeling of satisfaction that you try to work for the sake of the country.

    The whole sickness system needs to change because it excludes too many genuine claimants.
    I'm not saying it's an easy job but I'm sure a fairer assessment service can be designed.
    All the government seems to do is adjust the descriptors every now and then which helps to keep the tribunals clogged up.
  • honestjon
    honestjon Online Community Member Posts: 173 Empowering
    And as for the workers of the working class, you will find most of them claiming a myriad of benefits so as to not want to bother going back to work. 

    I'd counter and say many people are having to claim benefits as their wages are too low and the cost of living is now so high.  
    I would agree with you and I know people who have always worked  and are still working but are forced to claim universal credit .
    Being on universal credit or other benefits does not mean you are lazy because many are forced into it.
  • poppy123456
    poppy123456 Online Community Member Posts: 64,463 Championing
    chiarieds said:
    I should be inured to 2oldcodgers' comments by now, but apparently not.
    People on various threads are showing their concerns over the Autumn statement, & others are trying to reassure. 2oldcodgers instead adds posts that help no-one, & are insensitive, inappropriate & misleading. Why are such comments allowed to continue, do the community house rules mean nothing?
    Yes indeed it seems exactly this way. It feels like there’s one rule for one and a different rule for others… 
  • honestjon
    honestjon Online Community Member Posts: 173 Empowering
    I think scope admin do a good job and they usually make a good call when they pause a thread for example when users are getting too excited.
    Freedom of speech is defended on scope but personally I find the freedom at times is abused by certain users.
    Maybe it's time to think about putting users on the naughty step for a short while?
    I only suggest this because it seems unfair that a trouble maker can get a discussion paused which then stops the forum doing its job.
    This is not a criticism of scope admin who I think do a good job in the circumstances 
  • honestjon
    honestjon Online Community Member Posts: 173 Empowering
    chiarieds said:
    I should be inured to 2oldcodgers' comments by now, but apparently not.
    People on various threads are showing their concerns over the Autumn statement, & others are trying to reassure. 2oldcodgers instead adds posts that help no-one, & are insensitive, inappropriate & misleading. Why are such comments allowed to continue, do the community house rules mean nothing?
    Yes indeed it seems exactly this way. It feels like there’s one rule for one and a different rule for others… 
    I think scope are right to support freedom of speech but freedom comes with responsibility.
    Fair is fair 
  • Albus_Scope
    Albus_Scope Posts: 9,714 Scope Online Community Coordinator
    Thank you @honestjon, if we miss things, please feel free to report comments, so the team can discuss them.
  • poppy123456
    poppy123456 Online Community Member Posts: 64,463 Championing
    honestjon said:
    chiarieds said:
    I should be inured to 2oldcodgers' comments by now, but apparently not.
    People on various threads are showing their concerns over the Autumn statement, & others are trying to reassure. 2oldcodgers instead adds posts that help no-one, & are insensitive, inappropriate & misleading. Why are such comments allowed to continue, do the community house rules mean nothing?
    Yes indeed it seems exactly this way. It feels like there’s one rule for one and a different rule for others… 
    I think scope are right to support freedom of speech but freedom comes with responsibility.
    Fair is fair 
    I don’t think I suggested otherwise. There’s a big difference between freedom of speech and misleading, insensitive and inappropriate information. 
  • honestjon
    honestjon Online Community Member Posts: 173 Empowering
    honestjon said:
    chiarieds said:
    I should be inured to 2oldcodgers' comments by now, but apparently not.
    People on various threads are showing their concerns over the Autumn statement, & others are trying to reassure. 2oldcodgers instead adds posts that help no-one, & are insensitive, inappropriate & misleading. Why are such comments allowed to continue, do the community house rules mean nothing?
    Yes indeed it seems exactly this way. It feels like there’s one rule for one and a different rule for others… 
    I think scope are right to support freedom of speech but freedom comes with responsibility.
    Fair is fair 
    I don’t think I suggested otherwise. There’s a big difference between freedom of speech and misleading, insensitive and inappropriate information. 
    I don't think you suggested otherwise Poppy. I agree with your points
  • honestjon
    honestjon Online Community Member Posts: 173 Empowering
    Thank you @honestjon, if we miss things, please feel free to report comments, so the team can discuss them.
    Thank you Albus and I don't think I will need to report anything because admin seems to have the situation under control.
  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Online Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 3,875 Championing

    And Supplementary Benefit. It was all going to be improved and simplified with ESA wasn't it..? 

    The Labour Party was formed because the elite cared not for the poor working classes then they created our NHS. The breakaway parties are what diluted Labour's strength not unions trying to hold onto workers' industries and livelihoods. 

     
  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 919 Championing
    edited November 2023
    woodbine said:
    Don't know about you poppy but I feel its like banging my head against a wall at the moment trying to re-assure people who sadly don't want to listen to the facts of the matter. I can only say it again "disabled people are not going to be forced to work or lose benefits its not going to happen." Yes from 2025 there will be changes for those who are sick (not disabled) and who are new claimants, changes for existing claimants won't happen till the end of the decade probably 2028 or later.

    I mentioned it in one place and was shot down, I think part of the problem is the rage against the current party in power and there is a refusal to believe this is the decision they have ended up making.

    Also that the original plans were so much worse so many are assuming its those that are applicable, and that the tories are not wanting to advertise they protecting existing claimants as it will appear soft.

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 919 Championing
    edited November 2023
    Danny123 said:
    In 2024 jobseekers will be looked at to try to get them into work quicker , if after 18 months no job , 6 months of a new tactic , if still no job and refuse to engage they will loose there benefits 

    In 2025 they are tightening the criteria for wca for NEW sick , disabled claimants , hence changing a few descriptors and maybe abolishing some .... Existing claiments are not  affected ..... Although I'm not sure where existing claiments stand when it comes to future assessments , wether we still get the current one or new updated one 

    There is a voulentry scheme for existing claiments if they would like too participate in some work if they think they could manage it but they WILL NOT force existing sick and disabled people into work 

    Then in 26/ 27 at the earliest they are abolishing wca and planning on replacing it with a new health element 
    .... Claiments who get pip already qualify automatically and claiments who are on surport group , lcwra etc will nearly certainly qualify or if not be given transitional protection 

    I think I've finally got it , my god no wonder people are scared , the media should be ashamed of themselves for the lack of facts and clarity .... As woodbine says election time is fast approaching....time to try to stay calm and take it in people , alot of Chinese whispering going around on forums inc scope and the media .... I've been on here for about a year now and on the whole spoken to nothing but good people , Inc poppy and woodbine , sometimes going over and over things until I drove them mad because of my OCD but theve always been patient and helped me , I've even been known to of given a bit of good advice myself 😅 .... Its easy to understand why everyone is so panicked but if you calm down and look at the facts it's not as bad as what everyone first thought , all that matters to these people is power and the government works with the media on such things to be as menecing as possible not to mention this is there last throw of the dice and they are trying to catch votes 


    I think it is harsh to fully blame the media on this, the messages that seem to be said are that the media got it totally wrong, however the plans were different to what ended up happening, the consultation (which is likely what the media were basing their speculation on) didnt even offer the current outcome as an option, the DWP gave the impression they were not even considering it, and we had Jeremy Hunt telling the press not that long ago, everyone in LCWRA is going to get reclassified.  I watched it live, it wasnt a misquote.  The BBC also had a (reliable) source tell them as well, so on their part I consider it above speculation.

    What changed since then?

    The chancellor got the budget windfall, and Suella Braverman was sacked.

    If we only have the media reporting things after they happen, it will be more accurate but then there is no opportunity to challenge it before it gets ratified.  I wouldnt have been aware of the consultation e.g. if there was no reporting on it, which meant I wouldnt have had my chance to take part in it.
  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Online Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 3,875 Championing

    And Supplementary Benefit

    *Supplementary Allowance*


  • 2oldcodgers
    2oldcodgers Posts: 739 Connected
    WhatThe said:

    And Supplementary Benefit. It was all going to be improved and simplified with ESA wasn't it..? 

    The Labour Party was formed because the elite cared not for the poor working classes then they created our NHS. The breakaway parties are what diluted Labour's strength not unions trying to hold onto workers' industries and livelihoods. 

     
    Well that is a take on the current fiasco involving the rail unions isn't it?
    I do believe that the rail union's only objective in the current strike is to try to force the government to bow down to a crazy settlement and force the industry back into public ownership. Never happen.