Liz Kendall and DWP’s First Opposition Question Session in Parliament 7 October 2024

On the 07 October 2024, the DWP team led by Liz Kendall will face opposition questions for the first time. MPs must submit their questions three days in advance to give ministers time to prepare. These questions will be published on the Parliament website before the session for transparency.
Given the significance of the proposed changes and their potential impact on PIP recipients, it’s reasonable to expect that some MPs may use this opportunity to seek clarification or updates on the government’s plans regarding PIP reforms.
The page hasn’t received any MP's questions yet but will be updated when they are submitted. It will be interesting to see if any of our members, who have already contacted their MPs with concerns, have their questions raised on their behalf.
Here’s a link confirming the date.
https://whatson.parliament.uk/event/cal48639
Comments
-
Ah brilliant, thanks for sharing @MW123 I'll definitely be tuning in for that.
0 -
I asked Grahame Morris to raise my concerns about PIP. Fingers
0 -
Thank you @MW123 I hope you don't mind but I thought I'd repost your link to make it clickable for members that are unable to copy and paste your link.
4 -
Poppy, I genuinely appreciate your kindness and support. I tried to post the link twice, once during my lunch break yesterday and again last night, but unfortunately, I had difficulty with it. You have a remarkable gift for understanding things, while I must admit I am not very adept at posting links or downloading apps. Despite having worked with computers for many decades, I rely on my secretary to handle the part where I may have to add a link in emails, so I have never really learned how to do it myself. I have a vague idea but as you have seen from my posts, I have trouble figuring out how to add links on my own, so I truly need all the support I can get!
I also heard that you and your daughter are heading off on holiday today. I cannot think of anyone more deserving of a good rest after all the invaluable hours you have dedicated to helping our community this year with your expertise on the benefits system. A big THANK YOU—you will certainly be missed. Have a fantastic holiday, and please bring back some sunshine; we could really use an Indian summer!
2 -
You're very welcome, I was hoping you would be ok with that. Posting links can be frustrating at times when it doesn't appear as a clickable link. It took me a few attempts this time, as you see by the edit in my comment.
Thank you for such lovely kind and thoughtful words, it really does mean a lot to me. We are both very excited this morning. I can't wait to relax by that pool and not do a single thing for 11 nights.
We've hardly had a summer this year so the hot sun is definitely needed and my pain levels will be considerably reduced and that's a huge bonus. I will be sure to bring some sun home with me.
2 -
I'm scared to watch can I ask someone said the goverment refused to sign echr human rights Bill would it be a bad thing of we come out of echr
0 -
Catherine, I am not sure who you are referring to when you mention someone saying the government refused to sign the ECHR. In fact, the UK was the first country to sign it in 1951, so I am unclear about the reference.
As a disabled person, I feel more secure with the protections afforded by the ECHR, which are incorporated into UK law through the Human Rights Act 1998. Although the government already has a degree of flexibility within the ECHR framework, I am concerned that without these protections, the rights of disabled and vulnerable groups could be further eroded. This could leave already vulnerable and disabled individuals more susceptible to policy changes that might cause them harm.
I understand that not everyone shares my view, and some people believe the UK should leave the ECHR. However, from my personal perspective as a disabled individual, I value the safeguards provided by the ECHR and worry about the potential consequences of losing them.
2 -
No I agree it's reform banging on about ECHR taking it out under the cloak of sending refugees back whilst taking all our rights away
1 -
Catherine, I apologise for the confusion in my previous response. I initially misunderstood your comment, thinking someone implied the government had refused to sign the ECHR, which is historically inaccurate.
I now recognise that you were referring to the Reform Party's stance on the ECHR, which was not directly mentioned in your original post. It is worth noting that this view is not exclusive to the Reform Party, as some Conservative MPs have expressed similar views on leaving the ECHR particularly during debates on the now abandoned Rwanda plan.
That said, even if the UK were to leave the ECHR, it would still be obligated to adhere to other international agreements which guarantees the right to seek asylum. These legal frameworks would restrict the government’s ability to make significant changes.
0 -
Oh don't apologise I don't understand my writing oh OK thankyou was concerned thanks
0 -
no questions regarding pip yet from what I can see
0 -
I have to admit I'm worried about this and the upcoming budget, I was reading a think tank report that the welfare bill is a "fiscal headache" which a spokesperson for scope shot down brilliantly.
It's obvious change is coming but is it change with carrot or is it change with a stick?
A lot of focus is on mental health, I would be happy to be assessed by a psychiatrist, thing is in Cornwall psychiatry is stretched to breaking point.
1 -
I think it'd take a long while to be able to train up all the new mental health professionals the country would need, though we do really need them. From what I've gathered, they keep talking about tackling ill health unemployment by making sure people don't end up having to go off sick with bad health.
Though I don't want to put ideas in peoples heads, so I'll repeat again; We have no idea what'll happen, but when the time comes, we can all talk about it. 😊0 -
(Apologies - as per usual I have a lot of thoughts which I’m going to spread over a few separate post, prehaps not all of them today - also I’m going to be blunt so those who trigger easily may want to skip past my posts on this thread)
I’m going to have to bit of a devils advocate here:
yes the mere mention of the dwp brings me out in cold sweats and the appointments of Kendall and reeves leaves me nervous at but (Kendall has a ‘vicious mcvey’ vibe to her and reeves for whatever reason reeves has yet to come to grips with the human (empathetic) component of being chancellor as of yet) - both have a huge to do list to repair the damage that the tories caused the disabled community in the past 14 years
howeverLast month it was reported that in the space of 3 months there had been 250k new pip applications
And these huge increases are a bit of a double economic whammy - not only does the increase of incapacity/disability benefit (such as uc and pip) awards cost a lot of money but the shear number leaving the workplace altogether due to health reasons is costing the economy massively
(and it’s not helping that less of the 16-24 yr old age group is moving from education to work -
most reading this must have figured out that even excluding the after effects of corrupt govs - after brexit, a pandemic, cost of living crisis (amongst other things) the uk (at least in this moment of time) can’t afford the exodus of the workplace due to health reasons nor the sharp increase of uc & pip claims
when you look at the situation in the black & white terms of above then it’s totally understandable that reeves/kendall/dwp common sense wise need to implement major changes to incapacity based welfare (in the form of reform, cuts, criteria changes etc……)
…………….however this is not a black and white situation and much empathy & compromise is needed if the treasury is to balance their books and the health of not just the sick/disabled but the whole country doesn’t collapse due to government/economic pressures
(Part 1)1 -
firstly I don’t think that the gov is being totally honest on why more people are leaving the workplace and/or going on the welfare system and that getting claimant levels back to pre 2010 levels is both impossible and potentially ethically wrong
It’s a fact that even though many disabled ppl died during the pandemic, covid also worsened some ppls pre-existing disablities but also disabled many from long covid and/or damage done internally from catching covid (which may of been a lesser number if the gov at the time protected the country better)
Also the pandemic (and lockdown) triggered in many (probably millions) their first experiences of anxiety/depression/mental health illnesses ——————————————— more on that in a moment
The cost of living crisis almost overlapped the “end” of the pandemic and I don’t think mps ever acknowledged that this forced many peoples hand in claiming welfare that on paper they are very much entitled to (most disabled know not to claim anything from the dwp unless they have no other options……………and those with more ‘minor’/‘time limited’ condition have had no choice but to roll the dice with filling in the pip application paperwork - totally understandable to want to keep head above water or give yourself a little more breathing space.
I disagree and find in insulting when politicians describe mental health conditions such as depression & anxiety (which worst case is life destroying and/or potentially life ending) as being a ‘bit bluesy’ and ‘too lazy to get out of bed’
but mental health conditions like depression and anxiety (I personally wouldn’t class either as full blown disabilities even though both affect me daily - though as both are clearly debilitating I understand their official classification as disabilities) probably has the largest scale range of minor to severe conditions
There are many other ‘commonly occurring’ disabilities of this vein experienced by a sizeable number
i guess the first question is that when our politicians first conceived incapacity welfare such as esa, uc, dla, pip………. did the dwp intend to be the safety net for everyone experiencing a disability (under the governments official definition of disability - which happens to be a very inclusive definition) - and if not where should the ‘cut off point’ be
it’s the ultimate can of worms question (and one I think many scope members will be upset with me questioning)
and I know many of you will be wanting this labour gov to target other social groups such as the ‘wealthy’ (well, middle classes as we know politicians never target multimillionaires potential donors - reeves has already ruled out unites proposal of a wealth tax that actually sounded quite fair) and migrants
but even if labour targeted other social groups that would do zero in reducing the number of incapacity benefit claimants nor stop or slow this rapid increase in numbers predicted in the coming yearsany Responsible government government would need to address the current situation sooner or later and we can’t be angry that labour want to reduce number of claimants and the benefit bill
However the disabled have more than every right to get angry of how labour go about this (I’m currently cautiously calm with timms/mcgovern appointment but Kendall/reeves are Tory levels of poor in terms of empathy imo)
(Part 2)1 -
Hope the labour government doesn't stop the pip cash payment as it will be attack on disabled people just like they attacked the pensioners by stopping the winter fuel payment
1 -
Wouldn't this apply for lwcra as well
0 -
I always think people should be careful how they treat disabled people and those with chronic illness, because they may be in good health now, but at any stage that can change for anyone, even them.
I still think Stephen Timms is a good man. He said nothing today that made me feel otherwise. What I think is important to take into account is some disabled people can work and actually want to work. However, there are many that through not fault of their own cannot. Those who want and are able to work should be helped and supported in good jobs, but those who are unable and too unwell to work should not be harassed and penalised, because seriously, who wants to be ill? Compassion & understanding needed.
3 -
Amazing thankyou
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 15K Start here and say hello!
- 7.1K Coffee lounge
- 83 Games den
- 1.7K People power
- 114 Announcements and information
- 23.8K Talk about life
- 5.6K Everyday life
- 341 Current affairs
- 2.4K Families and carers
- 861 Education and skills
- 1.9K Work
- 510 Money and bills
- 3.6K Housing and independent living
- 1K Transport and travel
- 875 Relationships
- 254 Sex and intimacy
- 1.5K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.4K Talk about your impairment
- 859 Rare, invisible, and undiagnosed conditions
- 918 Neurological impairments and pain
- 2.1K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.2K Autism and neurodiversity
- 38.8K Talk about your benefits
- 5.9K Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
- 19.4K PIP, DLA, ADP and AA
- 7.9K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.5K Benefits and income