We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.
pip12345 said: In my pip2 claim form I have said mobility causes arm pain which I am being investigated for.
pip12345 said: I've just had a visit to a chiropractor. He diagnosed me with scoliosis.The scoliosis effects my posture/gait. I have hip arthritis like symptoms in knee/hip/groin. This all effects my mobility. I was unaware of all of the above as I've had this since childhood.In my pip2 claim form I have said mobility causes arm pain which I am being investigated for.The decision has arrived stating I have no lower limb restrictions and therefore will not be considered for mobility.I am in MR stage. The scoliosis, hip and knee pain was not mentioned in my pip2.However, I would like to link it to making my arm pain worse due to pressure caused by poor gait.Would it be recommended to do this in MR/tribunal stage? Or should I submit this as a new condition to DWP?Note that I have had standard daily living awarded with 11 points. I am putting in an MR to get more points to get up to enhanced.
pip12345 said: Buy I think with the arthritis diagnoses, this should be enough evidence them I'm not able to walk reliably.
pip12345 said: @chiarieds you mentioned that lordosis or scoliosis shouldn't effect mobility. I'm not questioning your knowledge but both conditions can affect a person's gait which has an impact on balance and coordination. Furthermore scoliosis causes uneven hips which can put pressure on hips which may eventually lead to osteoarthritis. Also scoliosis causes uneven shoulders which can put pressure on shoulders.The chiropractor did mention I do not have a single condition, rather it is systemic where the cause is unknown but one thing is having an effect on another.I agree arm injury doesn't effect mobility, but mobility can excarbate arm pain due to indirect pressure (chatgpt answer).
Wilf60 said: pip12345 said: @chiarieds you mentioned that lordosis or scoliosis shouldn't effect mobility. I'm not questioning your knowledge but both conditions can affect a person's gait which has an impact on balance and coordination. Furthermore scoliosis causes uneven hips which can put pressure on hips which may eventually lead to osteoarthritis. Also scoliosis causes uneven shoulders which can put pressure on shoulders.The chiropractor did mention I do not have a single condition, rather it is systemic where the cause is unknown but one thing is having an effect on another.I agree arm injury doesn't effect mobility, but mobility can excarbate arm pain due to indirect pressure (chatgpt answer). I agree with both of the above posters that PIP is a points based system and that is how the benefit is awarded and you should match your symptoms with the descriptors. However, a diagnoses is important evidence and is relevant to how describe how your disability affects you. On a technical point it is all about the balance of probabilities. The more evidence you have the greater chance you have of being successful as the balance of probabilities swings more to your direction.I also agree with you regarding scoliosis. I suffer with scoliosis (although it is not my main disability) and I can confirm I have the same problems with balance, coordination and gait. Also I have problems with my left arm where due to the twist in my spine arthritis has been diagnosed in the shoulder area. So with respect to the above poster you are wrong.
pip12345 said: If you have an official diagnosis from a specialist/GP then there is no need to go into symptoms etc.
poppy123456 said: pip12345 said: If you have an official diagnosis from a specialist/GP then there is no need to go into symptoms etc.That's absolutely not correct at all and this is where i think you're not quite understanding the criteria. You say you're aware that it's not about a diagnosis and then state the above.Everyone is affected differently by these conditions and it's not a "one size fits all" This is why it's your responsibilty to tell them exactly how your conditions affect them. A diagnosis, doesn't tell them anything and is often not in question anyway. This is one of the reasons why they do not accept internet print offs of symtoms of any conditions.
pip12345 said: Wilf60 said: pip12345 said: @chiarieds you mentioned that lordosis or scoliosis shouldn't effect mobility. I'm not questioning your knowledge but both conditions can affect a person's gait which has an impact on balance and coordination. Furthermore scoliosis causes uneven hips which can put pressure on hips which may eventually lead to osteoarthritis. Also scoliosis causes uneven shoulders which can put pressure on shoulders.The chiropractor did mention I do not have a single condition, rather it is systemic where the cause is unknown but one thing is having an effect on another.I agree arm injury doesn't effect mobility, but mobility can excarbate arm pain due to indirect pressure (chatgpt answer). I agree with both of the above posters that PIP is a points based system and that is how the benefit is awarded and you should match your symptoms with the descriptors. However, a diagnoses is important evidence and is relevant to how describe how your disability affects you. On a technical point it is all about the balance of probabilities. The more evidence you have the greater chance you have of being successful as the balance of probabilities swings more to your direction.I also agree with you regarding scoliosis. I suffer with scoliosis (although it is not my main disability) and I can confirm I have the same problems with balance, coordination and gait. Also I have problems with my left arm where due to the twist in my spine arthritis has been diagnosed in the shoulder area. So with respect to the above poster you are wrong. Spot on about balance of probabilities. I disagree that showing how a condition effects you without an official diagnosis lowers the chance of being awarded on balance of probabilities. Whilst I do not disagree that claimants in the past have been awarded without treatment/diagnosis it is an exception rather than the rule. When I had an official diagnosis for arthritis in the hand, it was very difficult for the health assessor not to award me points albeit she awarded me points on the lower end
Everyone is affected differently by these conditions and it's not a "one size fits all" This is why it's your responsibilty to tell them exactly how your conditions affect them. A diagnosis, doesn't tell them anything and is often not in question anyway. This is one of the reasons why they do not accept internet print offs of symtoms of any conditions.
Wilf60 said: pip12345 said: Wilf60 said: pip12345 said: @chiarieds you mentioned that lordosis or scoliosis shouldn't effect mobility. I'm not questioning your knowledge but both conditions can affect a person's gait which has an impact on balance and coordination. Furthermore scoliosis causes uneven hips which can put pressure on hips which may eventually lead to osteoarthritis. Also scoliosis causes uneven shoulders which can put pressure on shoulders.The chiropractor did mention I do not have a single condition, rather it is systemic where the cause is unknown but one thing is having an effect on another.I agree arm injury doesn't effect mobility, but mobility can excarbate arm pain due to indirect pressure (chatgpt answer). I agree with both of the above posters that PIP is a points based system and that is how the benefit is awarded and you should match your symptoms with the descriptors. However, a diagnoses is important evidence and is relevant to how describe how your disability affects you. On a technical point it is all about the balance of probabilities. The more evidence you have the greater chance you have of being successful as the balance of probabilities swings more to your direction.I also agree with you regarding scoliosis. I suffer with scoliosis (although it is not my main disability) and I can confirm I have the same problems with balance, coordination and gait. Also I have problems with my left arm where due to the twist in my spine arthritis has been diagnosed in the shoulder area. So with respect to the above poster you are wrong. Spot on about balance of probabilities. I disagree that showing how a condition effects you without an official diagnosis lowers the chance of being awarded on balance of probabilities. Whilst I do not disagree that claimants in the past have been awarded without treatment/diagnosis it is an exception rather than the rule. When I had an official diagnosis for arthritis in the hand, it was very difficult for the health assessor not to award me points albeit she awarded me points on the lower end However, it is proven that the more evidence provided makes it more likely the benefit will be awarded
The value must be greater than or equal to 1.
Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering