Surely this is a cheat..changing WCA to PIP

So as I understand it the previous attempt by the government to change LCWRA descriptors was deemed illegal because sure enough it was in fact only an attempt to save money and not to help or access people too sick to work…so the recent government announcement to merge the WCA criteria with PIP( and non work related benefit which they intend to tighten( is just doing the same thing but avoiding the courts surely?
Comments
-
Hi @tomwalker, it might be worth checking out our Green Paper Discussion which we've created for our members to discuss the recent green paper release (if you've not already seen it of course) 😊
Also, just thought I'd add some links where you can join Scope in pushing back against these cuts. Here are some of the ways you can get involved:
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 14.8K Start here and say hello!
- 7K Coffee lounge
- 78 Games den
- 1.7K People power
- 91 Announcements and information
- 22.9K Talk about life
- 5.4K Everyday life
- 213 Current affairs
- 2.3K Families and carers
- 850 Education and skills
- 1.8K Work
- 486 Money and bills
- 3.5K Housing and independent living
- 970 Transport and travel
- 679 Relationships
- 71 Sex and intimacy
- 1.4K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.4K Talk about your impairment
- 853 Rare, invisible, and undiagnosed conditions
- 910 Neurological impairments and pain
- 2K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.2K Autism and neurodiversity
- 37.5K Talk about your benefits
- 5.8K Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
- 19K PIP, DLA, ADP and AA
- 7.3K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.4K Benefits and income