Surely this is a cheat..changing WCA to PIP
So as I understand it the previous attempt by the government to change LCWRA descriptors was deemed illegal because sure enough it was in fact only an attempt to save money and not to help or access people too sick to work…so the recent government announcement to merge the WCA criteria with PIP( and non work related benefit which they intend to tighten( is just doing the same thing but avoiding the courts surely?
Comments
-
Hi @tomwalker, it might be worth checking out our Green Paper Discussion which we've created for our members to discuss the recent green paper release (if you've not already seen it of course) 😊
Also, just thought I'd add some links where you can join Scope in pushing back against these cuts. Here are some of the ways you can get involved:
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 15.9K Start here and say hello!
- 7.6K Coffee lounge
- 108 Games den
- 1.8K People power
- 163 Announcements and information
- 25.4K Talk about life
- 6.2K Everyday life
- 506 Current affairs
- 2.5K Families and carers
- 874 Education and skills
- 2K Work
- 588 Money and bills
- 3.7K Housing and independent living
- 1.2K Transport and travel
- 646 Relationships
- 1.6K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.5K Talk about your impairment
- 883 Rare, invisible, & undiagnosed conditions
- 942 Neurological impairments and pain
- 2.2K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.3K Autism and neurodiversity
- 41K Talk about your benefits
- 6.1K Employment & Support Allowance (ESA)
- 20.3K PIP, DLA, ADP & AA
- 9.2K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.3K Benefits and income
