We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.
woodbine said: You might be confusing the fact that a high % get overturned at tribunal.
VippidyP said: woodbine said: You might be confusing the fact that a high % get overturned at tribunal. This is what I remember reading; https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/pip-investigation-welfare-expert-says-two-thirds-of-appeals-involve-lying-assessors/But that's neither here nor there, given that I've been blatantly lied about, what can I, and others like me, do to see justice done? How can we prevent this from happening in the future? If there's no actual consequences, then there's nothing preventing it.
Username_removed said: Legally you cannot demonstrate a lie. Only that the report contained factual inaccuracies. HCPs have no reason to lie but they also work under incredible pressure. Mistakes will be made; wrong boxes will be ticked; phrases will be used which applied to the person before you but not you. It’s accepted that the occasions this happens are a significant minority. That needs to reduce to a small minority. How do you do that? Well if you focus on lies then any complaint will fail. If you focus on factual inaccuracies you may get changes to your report. Occasionally you may even get changes in the recommended points. Not always for the better. Will any of that change anything for other people? I doubt it. Could the community help in some way? I can’t see it. The best thing you can do is get your own house in order and make sure people have a clear idea of their options. On another Ievel though there is lots for you to think about and do. A decision is not just based on a HCP report.If your claim failed twice then you need to look at your claim pack. If it was good enough and focused on the right areas then it’s much harder for a HCP assessment to go wrong and much harder for a DM to accept. If you did your renewal the same way you did your original claim and both failed then eventually you have to ask questions about your claim pack rather than the HCP report. An instant change to think about would be asking for an ongoing award. If you didn’t ask then the guidance always points to short awards. It’s up to you to make the case. Why go through it every 2 to 5 years if it was within your power to make that 10.
AndrewHall said: Yes, rhe assessors are under pressure from DWP to keep the numbers of claimants down.
calcotti said: AndrewHall said: Yes, rhe assessors are under pressure from DWP to keep the numbers of claimants down. Do you have any evidence to support that assertion?
VippidyP said: Hey, I'm new here, I suffer with mental health issues. I've had a PIP claim before that ended up being overturned by the tribunal. The assessor just outright lied about me and I scored all 0.I had to renew my claim and the exact same thing happened again. I understand how to appeal, that's not what I'm looking for advice on. What I'm interested in is what can I do to make sure the assessor gets punished for lying? How can we, as a community, stop this from happening? How do I ensure they can't do this to somebody else?
Johnjo5555 said:.. I've also learnt recently they tell doctors/mental health nurses, it not so many words, not to write letters of support to claiments as they would more than likely not use them, ..
calcotti said: Johnjo5555 said:.. I've also learnt recently they tell doctors/mental health nurses, it not so many words, not to write letters of support to claiments as they would more than likely not use them, .. And where have you ‘learnt’ that? Sounds false to me. It is true that DWP will inform GPS (if the claimant gives consent) that DWP no longer require Fit Notes but that is different.
AndrewHall said: You are causing confusion here.It is the same illegal intervention if the DWP has to tell GPs not to issue further fit Notes. DWP has no rights whatsoever on what to tell GP to write.
DWP would like to share its decision based on the result of your Work Capability Assessment (WCA) with your doctor, or any doctor treating you. This will help the doctor, as it will tell them when they no longer need to provide you with Statements of Fitness for Work (also known as fit notes or medical certificates) for the purposes of this claim.We need your agreement to share this information.You do not have to give your agreement, if you do not agree it will not affect your claim for Universal Credit.
calcotti said: AndrewHall said: You are causing confusion here.It is the same illegal intervention if the DWP has to tell GPs not to issue further fit Notes. DWP has no rights whatsoever on what to tell GP to write. There is a question on the UC50 asking DWP would like to share its decision based on the result of your Work Capability Assessment (WCA) with your doctor, or any doctor treating you. This will help the doctor, as it will tell them when they no longer need to provide you with Statements of Fitness for Work (also known as fit notes or medical certificates) for the purposes of this claim.We need your agreement to share this information.You do not have to give your agreement, if you do not agree it will not affect your claim for Universal Credit.The claimant can say yes or no. If they give consent then clearly DWP can inform GP and are not acting illegally because they have the express of the claimant to do so. If I were completing a UC50 I would say no.I can’t see what is confusing about that.i am none the wiser about the poster has ‘learnt’ about DWP telling medical professionals to write letters in a more general sense.
The value must be greater than or equal to 1.
Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering