The Green Paper Discussion (the document link is here too!)
Comments
-
@Squirrel1_@secretsquirrel1 I completed my own PIP form at a time when my main carer was a family member. I received points of 4 and above for the daily living activities affected by my disability.
0 -
ChatGPT says this on consultations.
In the UK, the government is not legally required to hold public consultations on all new legislation, but it is strongly encouraged as part of good governance.
When Are Consultations Required?
The government follows the Consultation Principles (last updated in 2018), which set out best practices for engaging stakeholders before making policy or legislative changes. However, consultations are not legally binding unless specific laws require them.
Situations Where Consultation May Be Required
- Statutory Requirement – Some laws explicitly require consultations. For example:
- Equality Act 2010 – Requires consultation where policies impact protected groups.
- Local Government Acts – Require consultations on certain local authority decisions.
- Judicial Review Risk – If a government decision significantly affects people's rights and there is no consultation, courts may find the decision unlawful through judicial review (if it is deemed unfair or irrational).
- Major Policy Changes – While not always legally required, the government often consults on:
- Large-scale reforms (e.g., tax, healthcare, education).
- Regulatory changes affecting businesses.
- Controversial issues (e.g., environmental policies).
Exceptions
- Emergencies (e.g., COVID-19 laws) – The government can bypass consultations if immediate action is needed.
- Manifesto Commitments – The government may argue that consultation is unnecessary for policies promised in election manifestos.
Conclusion
While not always legally required, consultations are often conducted to ensure transparency, fairness, and to avoid legal challenges. Failure to consult can lead to judicial reviews or political backlash.
2 - Statutory Requirement – Some laws explicitly require consultations. For example:
-
I’m still confused
1 -
If that’s right that is major as this was not in the manifesto and it directly involves the equality act as disability is a protected characteristic. Is it incompetence, pig ignorance, thinking the law doesn’t apply to them or is it another double crossing stupid political game trying to win right wing votes knowing it will get thrown out anyway?
5 -
I don't know how they think taking people's PIP ,Carers and LWC will make people work 🤷🏻♀️ I wasn't aware that poorness was the fix to all of our medical issues
1 -
Exactly!! I read it same way as you, we are protected under the equality act 2010 and it should have been consulted on legally. In my view(and i'm not Judge Judy) this can be challenged in court.
2 -
Can this be pushed through before next year ? My review is April 2026 I believe
1 -
Me, I'm close to VSEDing. And if I get reassessed and classed as fit for work or LCW it means there will then be things that I'll be required to do by the work coach, which I will not be able to do, which means my money will be cut further or stopped altogether, which will mean I'll have no choice but to VSED, as I wont be able to afford food and will starve, and even if I could afford food, I just couldn't live with the worry of having baliffs coming round or being taken to court because of me not being able to pay council tax, I wont be able to take meds anymore due to not being able to have free prescriptions anymore, I'll be housebound as I wont be able to afford to run my car anymore, and my gas and electricity will end up being cut off because of not being able to pay the bills. So I would rather be dead and will just refuse food even if it's given to me for free. I will take appetite suppressants so I don't suffer as much, and will stop drinking all fluids so I don't suffer for as long.
0 -
Me too.
1 -
So as we are a protected group under the equality act then by law they have to have a consultation.
Labour are done for.
2 -
We can't even end it all as once our money is cut we can't afford a cremation!! I'll have to wait until bonfire night and volunteer to be Guy Fawkes, or throw myself on next doors barbeque in summer to save money!!
1 -
I really do hope so especially after Ellen Clifford just won in court over the last green paper. You’d think though Starmer would know this as he was literally the top lawyer in the country at one point being director of public prosecutions so it’s cast doubt over whether this is a deliberate ploy to win votes from the right knowing it’s going to be challenged? Or does he just think so highly of himself that he doesn’t care anymore? I don’t trust this government at all after leaky Liz and her department the past week leaking all this to the press. But at least there’s a bit of hope it won’t go ahead so fingers crossed 🤞🏻
1 -
I would have thought so. It can't be challenged I suppose. More bad news 😢
0 -
Yes exactly, maybe i'm wrong but sure others on here are more legally minded than myself!!
0 -
and you’d think Starmer would know this . If I remember correctly it was starmer who took Blair’s government to court to win benefits for asylum seekers so he must know something of these laws . Either it’s gross ignorance of the laws or it makes me think perhaps they’re hoping to look tough for the right wing but actually know hardly anything will be implemented.
2 -
Well I filled in the consultation form, I was as polite as I could be but it's oddly cathartic having a good rant at them even if it won't do any good. With a bit of creative thinking you can turn any of the questions into an opportunity to tell them they are going to kill people.
3 -
I hope it’s the same now and I can’t see how it would work ie carers , but I wouldn’t put anything passed them . I’ve been looking online and nothings popped up so hopefully it’s not true.
0 -
Thankyou that got a much needed titter out of me
0 -
I looked it up . The 2010 disability act also includes MH. that isn’t classed as mild and chronic pain and fatigue conditions. So the fact that the points system can go against MH must surely be illegal. I have fibromyalgia and ME so they should also be protected
0 -
I commented the same regarding Starmer . They look tough on benefits but even if it’s implemented by the dwp if it goes to court and they lose it’s back pay for everyone. By then Labour will probably be finished anyway so no come back on them
2
Categories
- All Categories
- 15.7K Start here and say hello!
- 7.4K Coffee lounge
- 101 Games den
- 1.7K People power
- 149 Announcements and information
- 24.7K Talk about life
- 6K Everyday life
- 477 Current affairs
- 2.5K Families and carers
- 889 Education and skills
- 1.9K Work
- 558 Money and bills
- 3.7K Housing and independent living
- 1.1K Transport and travel
- 632 Relationships
- 1.5K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.5K Talk about your impairment
- 873 Rare, invisible, and undiagnosed conditions
- 935 Neurological impairments and pain
- 2.2K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.2K Autism and neurodiversity
- 40.9K Talk about your benefits
- 6.1K Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
- 20K PIP, DLA, ADP and AA
- 8.9K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.9K Benefits and income




