Green Paper Related Discussions

18283858788146

Comments

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing
  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    I believe the same Catherine . I can’t see how anyone can be this incompetent.

  • bton1968
    bton1968 Community Member Posts: 155 Empowering

    every thing he does stinks of him currying favour with the EU … that's where his next job is !

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    Absolutely and all the back benchers will be left behind jobless

  • johnnyy85
    johnnyy85 Community Member Posts: 266 Empowering
  • johnnyy85
    johnnyy85 Community Member Posts: 266 Empowering
  • geckobat
    geckobat Community Member Posts: 204 Empowering

    Very interesting post and yes, I agree completely that the LCWRA/ESA issue is being ignored for the most part. I'm one of those people who only has LCWRA and it feels like there will be nowhere for me to turn at all when the changes happen. I hope that won't be the case.

  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 6,038 Championing

    Probably. They've made a tidy sum from our misery and won't help us. Same story with Irwin Mitchell, Sir Andrew Mitchell's law firm.

  • Tumilty
    Tumilty Community Member Posts: 506 Empowering

    Hi, no I'm not going anywhere I consider people here your all friends and I love posting and responding.🤗 The process of the reassessment went quite smooth even though I was in a state and panicked on a few questions that I didn't understand. . @Passerby have you filled the form in yet? The person told me that the form she has I filled in over a year ago.

  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 6,038 Championing
    edited June 2025

    passerby, I'm glad you stayed!

    "In addition, the DWP give undisclosed guidelines to PIP and WCA assessors, leading to a higher rate of failed claims. Whistleblowers and campaigners have also alleged that the DWP provide internal guidelines or instructions to assessors that are not publicly available. The DWP denied this, and this denial of undisclosed guidelines raises questions about the transparency and fairness of the assessment process."

    Please post your link again as I found out a fact (to quote the loathsome Robert Devereux in reply to a question about UC at a committee meeting 😆)

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    I’ll look it up later when I’m up to it . It may be we have more rights in the courts than we’ve been told

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    Was it the law firm that were asked by benefits and work to look into it ?

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    Interesting what you said about Leigh day not helping . I found this from benefits and work . They also took advice from Leigh day and were told nothing they can do basically

    IMG_1616.png IMG_1617.png IMG_1618.png IMG_1619.png IMG_1620.png
  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 6,038 Championing
    edited June 2025

    Even the Public Law Project is selective about which cases it supports for judicial review. I don't know what the answer is unless people are willing to revisit earlier welfare reforms which should never have been passed and which almost all MPs want to keep buried.

    The media has been silent about the "benefits fiasco" for 10 years. Some members argue that somehow it's not relevant to this Green Paper. I say it is.

    No law firm or charity can bring the Government into disrepute. That leaves us to do it!

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    They responded to you in the past though didn’t they ? I haven’t had a reply from anyone.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    Catherine you’ve been amazing, fighting for yourself and all of us . You really are a trooper . I’ve emailed the main people but nothing like you have . Mind you I never get a response. I think they know better than to ignore you 😀

  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 6,038 Championing

    Even the Public Law Project is selective about which cases it supports for judicial review. I don't know what the answer is unless people are willing to revisit earlier welfare reforms which should never have been passed and which almost all MPs want to keep buried.

    The media has been silent about the "benefits fiasco" for 10 years. Some members argue that somehow it's not relevant to this Green Paper. I say it is.

    No law firm or charity can bring the Government into disrepute. That leaves us to do it!

  • lincsgranny
    lincsgranny Community Member Posts: 201 Empowering
  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 6,038 Championing
    edited June 2025

    24 names? Crocodile tears. Shame on her and Timms.

This discussion has been closed.