Green Paper Related Discussions

1164165167169170

Comments

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,626 Championing

    So over a 100 know what they will do to people but can’t vote against as it’ll ruin their ride on the gravy train. Well they’d better get as many freebie’s as they can as in 4 years time they’ll be in the same position as us . Even the severe category is the same as the light touch we have now that they hardly award . So nothing new .

  • Danny123
    Danny123 Online Community Member Posts: 111 Empowering

    Absolute cowards , really does go to show what they really care about

  • YogiBear
    YogiBear Online Community Member Posts: 264 Empowering

    @Catherine21 New post from DPAC

    Important update

    The DWP have rescheduled their consultation on the disability cuts. The venue is now much more accessible and has better transport links.

    This was the result of disabled voices calling out the injustices of the previous event.

    The consultation is still unfair with the most controversial proposals not up for discussion.

  • YogiBear
    YogiBear Online Community Member Posts: 264 Empowering

    I predict that there's going to be a lot of MR and appeals happening when it comes to claimants who are going to be claiming/reassessed under the new PIP criteria (if the 4 point rule goes ahead). Hope DWP are prepared for it.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,626 Championing

    Imagine waiting 14 years in opposition and Starmer comes along and ruins your career, cos that’s what will happen. Vote against, get kicked out and become a hero . Or vote for cuts , keep on the gravy train and in 4?years time leave under a dark cloud . I emailed Starmer and said in 4 years labour won’t even be opposition . You’ll be finished .

  • bellatango
    bellatango Online Community Member Posts: 64 Contributor

    Britain’s benefits system faces collapse without cuts to disability payments, Liz Kendall has said, as the government published plans that put it on a collision course with dozens of angry Labour MPs.

    Kendall published her welfare reform bill on Wednesday, confirming it would lead to benefit cuts for 950,000 people by 2030. She said the country’s £326bn social security net might cease to exist if costs continued to escalate.

    The bill includes several concessions designed to win over fractious Labour MPs as ministers look to ward off the biggest rebellion of Keir Starmer’s premiership. But the efforts were met with hostility by many in the party, who said they still intended to vote against the bill next month.

    Kendall said: “Our social security system is at a crossroads. Unless we reform it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it. This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity.

    “This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot – putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth.”

    The bill will cut personal independence payments (Pips) for more than 800,000 people with disabilities, as well as carers’ support for 150,000 people who care for them. Claimants only able to wash half of their body or who are unable to cook a meal for themselves will no longer be able to claim Pips unless they have another limiting condition.

    The cuts are at the heart of an overall package of nearly £5bn in welfare savings which ministers argue are necessary to protect the financial sustainability of the benefits system.

    Kendall has tried to dispel widespread anger in the Labour party over the plans by introducing new concessions. Under the terms of the bill, people losing their disability benefits will get additional financial support for 13 weeks, while those with severe conditions such as heart disease or spinal injuries will not have to face reassessments.

    The work and pensions secretary has set out a separate £1bn plan to help unemployed people get back to work, but this is not related to Pips, which are unconnected to employment status.

    Whips are also issuing threats, and the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, refused on Wednesday to rule out the possibility of suspending any Labour rebels when the bill is put to a vote next month.

    The mixture of concessions and threats did not appear to have won over wavering Labour MPs, however, and many went public with their criticism after the bill was published.

    Rachael Maskell, the MP for York Central, said: “Having read the bill, it is clear that disabled people will lose significant support.

    “The explanatory notes set out that 800,000 will not receive the daily living component of Pip by 2029/2030 and 150,000 will also lose their carers allowance. Poverty will be the legacy of this bill.”

    Andy McDonald, the MP for Middlesbrough and Thornaby East, said the bill was “a huge attack on the incomes of disabled people”.

    “MPs are being expected to vote these through whilst the green paper consultation continues, before the Pip assessment review is conducted, and without any evidence the separate employment support package – which is not in this bill – will work.

    “This bill will be a yes or no on impoverishing disabled people. It’s a no from me.”

    Those feelings were echoed by disability campaign groups and charities.

    James Taylor, the director of strategy at the disability equality charity Scope said: “This bill will be catastrophic for disabled people. Cutting benefits will plunge hundreds of thousands into poverty. Over 800,000 will lose at least some financial support from Pip.

    “It will have a devastating effect on disabled people’s health, ability to live independently or work.”

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jun/18/uk-benefits-system-could-collapse-if-payments-are-not-cut-liz-kendall-says

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,626 Championing

    So the severe category is for heart disease and spinal injuries but no other lifelong conditions. What about the people on light touch now ? At least with the 10 years labour light touch it seems to be according to how your condition affects you and your assessor . This seems worse not an improvement

  • MW123
    MW123 Scope Member Posts: 1,262 Championing

    Hi Catherine, Just to clarify, I posted the link along with my thoughts underneath. These were simply my personal opinions based on what I've read, not any official stance from the government.

    Frankly, I’m appalled by how they’re handling this. Their approach to sick and disabled people feels utterly dismissive. Despite today’s publication, I’m still left wondering who will actually qualify under the Severe Conditions Criteria. I had hoped for clarity, but instead, we seem to be stuck in the same flawed system, medical assessments that lean on subjective opinions from assessors rather than concrete, transparent guidelines.

    What’s even more infuriating is the government’s claim that 200,000 people will qualify. How can they possibly arrive at that number when the criteria remain vague? The only way they could confidently state that figure is if they already have a predetermined idea of who fits into this category. Whether that’s based on internal modelling, specific conditions they won’t disclose, or a quiet narrowing of eligibility, they clearly have data but they’re refusing to share it. It’s as if they’ve set the threshold behind closed doors, ensuring that only a certain number of people will be accepted, rather than truly assessing based on need.

    This secrecy breeds suspicion. It makes me wonder how many individuals with severe needs will be unfairly excluded, not because their conditions are not serious enough, but simply because they don’t align with some hidden, arbitrary definition. That isn’t policy, it’s a betrayal of the people who need this support the most.

  • Ranald
    Ranald Online Community Member Posts: 1,196 Championing
    edited June 18

    Those that can work should, we all agree with that, but if this was the real reason, then they would put the help in place first.

    I can take a hit if I have to, but I hate being lied to.

  • bellatango
    bellatango Online Community Member Posts: 64 Contributor
    edited June 18

    I don't know which conditions are in the severe category, have you got a link to them squirrel? I'm also on a light touch review from 2019 to 2029 with enhanced for both parts I scored 13 for living but could easily lose some points on review.

    edit - yes I've just seen where it says that about heart disease.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,626 Championing

    I said exactly this . If they reckon 200,00 they’ve worked it out . If you check out bellatango above it says from the guardian it’s heart diseases and spinal injuries.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,626 Championing

    It’s in the post you shared Bella . I also have 13 points for living though no 4? Points and it’s for two years increased to three by dwp .

    IMG_1727.png
  • Danny123
    Danny123 Online Community Member Posts: 111 Empowering

    I think we can safely say that they are not 😅 this will be a chaotic disaster and they are sleepwalking into it

  • bellatango
    bellatango Online Community Member Posts: 64 Contributor

    @secretsquirrel1 do you just get pip for living, no mobility?

    Think I read somewhere (I might be wrong) that if you receive enhanced for both on review then it's changed to ongoing award with a light touch review. I was first awarded for 4 years and about a year before that was due to end I was told they had looked at it again and it was changed to an ongoing award and wouldn't be looked at again til after oct 2029. I'm 52

  • Danny123
    Danny123 Online Community Member Posts: 111 Empowering

    Couldn't agree more

  • Zipz
    Zipz Online Community Member Posts: 2,168 Trailblazing

    Where does the Bill state this?

    "The bill will cut personal independence payments (Pips) for more than 800,000 people with disabilities, as well as carers’ support for 150,000 people who care for them. Claimants only able to wash half of their body or who are unable to cook a meal for themselves will no longer be able to claim Pips unless they have another limiting condition."

    A person unable to prepare and cook a simple one course meal from fresh ingredients meets the 8- point descriptor.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,626 Championing

    Hi Bella , I get enhanced for both. I originally had standard care and enhanced mobility after fighting two years to upper tribunal. Then my last assessor lower mobility to standard and increased my care to enhanced . I was advised badly as I went MR for mobility and said to my advisor I want to ask for a longer award as assessor gave 2,years but dwp awarded 3. My advisor said no , wait to see what they say first . Advisor failed to send my new information in so they failed my MR. I called them and asked about tribunal and they said they’d just received the information I had sent so they sent it back to my case manager who immediately reinstated my enhanced. Had I asked for longer I may of got it . So when you had enhanced for both they originally gave you a short award time then increased it ? Did they say why if you don’t mind me asking . There seems to be a mystery around 10 year awards as I’ve also heard that enhanced both should get them

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,626 Championing

    There was a link to guardian at the bottom though I’m not subscribed.

  • MW123
    MW123 Scope Member Posts: 1,262 Championing

    You're absolutely right. These reforms offer little to help people like us. The Severe Conditions Criteria remain vague, with no clear list of qualifying conditions. The government claims that 200,000 people will be protected, yet we have no idea who they are referring to. They clearly have something in mind, but we are being left in the dark. Conditions such as fibromyalgia and ME, both incurable, may not be recognised under the criteria.

    Even more frustrating is the fact that if they can estimate 200,000 people, they must already have set criteria or a list of qualifying conditions. So why not be transparent? Keeping this information hidden only raises more questions. As for "light touch" reviews, they seem about as rare as a politician giving a straight answer.

    The criteria mention factors such as whether someone will always meet the LCWRA standard, if the condition is lifelong, if there is no realistic chance of improvement, and if it is diagnosed by an NHS professional. Yet in practice, everything depends on how individual assessors interpret these points. Without clear and consistent guidance, fairness simply cannot be guaranteed.