Scope's reply to the governments planned concessions to the green paper.

191012141554

Comments

  • mac99
    mac99 Online Community Member Posts: 39 Contributor

    these are concessions are not concessions at all if at your next review you would be subject to the 4 point rule.that was always the way it was going to work and saying current claimants will be exempt and only apply to new claims is a lie if after november 2026 currrent claimants will be subject to the 4 point rule.that is what was going to happen before these concessions so current claimants will not be protected if thats the case and the pip cuts will be exactly as they were going to be.

    also current lcwra claimants were never going to have they're money cut in 2026 but would have a freeze on the rate.the way i see things is there are no concessions as there doesn't seem to be any protections for anybody apart from the 200,000 who get in the scc group and be spared reassessment.

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 1,170 Championing
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 1,170 Championing
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 1,170 Championing
    edited June 2025
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • mac99
    mac99 Online Community Member Posts: 39 Contributor
  • mac99
    mac99 Online Community Member Posts: 39 Contributor

    the 4 point pip rule im referring to if what the mp said is correct.

  • Trevor_PIP
    Trevor_PIP Online Community Member Posts: 1,224 Championing
    edited June 2025

    I am not one of those idiots either if you don't mind... I have investigated the increases in benefit claims etc before I typed about it on this forum. I also know young people that claim LCWRA that train regularly in gyms and can lift colossal weight. They use steroids to build huge muscular frames. The benefits systems are being fleeced and the DWP know they are, hence more investigators have been employed and claimants bank accounts checked. You have a point about cost of living but would these people claim ill health benefits?

    The increases in working age claiming ill health benefits since lockdown is costing £34 billion not Reeves so called £5 billion and is unsustainable. There is definitely something amiss as it has never been seen previously. There were 1/4m claims for PIP the first quarter of this year, when once it was no more than 45k.

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 1,170 Championing
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Trevor_PIP
    Trevor_PIP Online Community Member Posts: 1,224 Championing
    edited June 2025

    I have read the article and the figures quoted are different to what I have read and investigated. The increases in working age claiming ill health benefits since lockdown has gone up by 2/3 and is costing £34 billion not the £5 billion Reeves is claiming back. This is why the Conservatives wanted to go further. I am not spreading misinformation, it is known by the DWP that benefits systems are being fleeced and they are employing more investigators to catch the perpetrators, even checking claimants bank accounts which has started and I thought was for UC but I have been informed PIP as well from the bank itself. Everything I type has been investigated. Thank you for your kind words.

  • mac99
    mac99 Online Community Member Posts: 39 Contributor

    we'll have to wait and see as liz kendall is giving all the details of the concessions on monday.hopefully we will get clarity on whats going to happen.

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 1,170 Championing
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Danny123
    Danny123 Online Community Member Posts: 223 Empowering

    Right so that's that then people in the position that I'm in of being on CBESA / LCWRA but no pip will be assessed under the new 4 point criteria then .... Absolutely criminal , these concessions have changed nothing for us then

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 1,170 Championing
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Danny123
    Danny123 Online Community Member Posts: 223 Empowering

    I give up .... at least I know what's what now ....November 2026 the new pip criteria won't apply to us no matter if we're assessed before or after that date it will still be with the WCA , it's when the WCA gets scrapped in 2028 / 2029 is when it will affect us and we will have too take the new 4 point criteria .... I'll just keep taking the WCA until it gets abolished , I should get one more as I'm 3 and a half years overdue so I will be getting one before the WCA gets scrapped , if they start in April 2026 again I'm hoping I can go without one till beginning of 2027 , then pass it and get a 2 year award meaning that will take me till beginning of 2029 , then I'll just take it from there 😩 absolutely nothing has changed whatsoever , these concessions mean nothing for us , it's vile what they are doing .... Obviously the most are happy with this , all the ones that have dropped out of the rebellion are cowards

  • alexroda
    alexroda Online Community Member Posts: 346 Trailblazing

    mate, sorry to say but you don’t know what you are talking about.
    Why say lockdown rather than pandemic?

    Why not mention the state of the NHS and other public services?

    There were more than 2 million people affected with long Covid, a new disease that no one knows the long term effects of it for a start.

    As a % of GDP, the UK government is spending the same amount on working-age benefits as it was in 2015. This stands at around 5% and is not projected to change by 2030. This is because we have seen deep cuts to benefits like Universal Credit alongside the increase in people claiming health and disability benefits.

    Look at the facts rather than speak out based on your personal impressions or prejudices.

  • alexroda
    alexroda Online Community Member Posts: 346 Trailblazing

    I’d also encourage you to start doing some research on how much money does the UK government spends on disability benefits compared to other European countries as per %GDP.

    These cuts are a cost cutting exercise to balance the books. That’s all this is.

  • MW123
    MW123 Scope Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    The government says, as part of its new concessions, it will increase the health part of Universal Credit in line with inflation, but only for people who meet a very strict definition of having a “severe condition”.

    Most people currently receiving the LCWRA element won’t fall into that category under the new rules. I put this to my MP yesterday. She couldn’t answer and said she’d go back to Westminster to get clarification and update me at next week’s meeting.

    This is exactly what I have asked her to confirm:

    Why thousands of people already receiving the health element support, because they’ve been found to have serious, long-term health problems, will still have their payments frozen from 2026 to 2029, even though they’re not being moved onto the lower rate.

    Isn’t that effectively a benefit cut, and how does that square with the government’s claim to be treating disabled people fairly?

    I’ve asked my MP to explain who actually qualifies for the so-called ‘severe conditions’ group, because as it stands, there’s no public definition available at all. The system is asking people to meet criteria that haven’t even been clearly set out. If ministers can’t explain the rules, how on earth are claimants expected to navigate them?

    She admitted she didn’t know and couldn’t give an answer, but has said she will return to Westminster to seek clarification and get back to me next week.

  • MW123
    MW123 Scope Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    You’re absolutely right, these so called “concessions” fall apart under scrutiny. If current claimants will still face the 4-point rule at their next review after November 2026 (though as my MP said yesterday, it could be years away for many claimants depending on when their next review takes place after the new rules come into effect), then the idea that the changes “only apply to new claims” is clearly misleading. That’s exactly how the reforms were going to work before the announcement.

    And yes, you’re spot on about the LCWRA element too, there was never a direct cut planned in 2026, just a freeze. So what’s changed? Nothing of substance. If PIP is still being overhauled as planned, and most current UC claimants will lose inflationary protection, then the picture remains exactly as bleak as it was before.

    Aside from the small number placed in the Severe Conditions Criteria group, these reforms still offer no meaningful safeguard. It’s spin without substance.

This discussion has been closed.