Scope's reply to the governments planned concessions to the green paper.

1111214161756

Comments

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,542 Championing
    Screenshot_20250628_210208_Chrome.jpg

    NNeed loads more before Tuesday so they can take to government

  • MyHappy256
    MyHappy256 Online Community Member Posts: 110 Empowering

    So I just got a letter from DWP telling me that my existing claim expires in December 2025, I got PIP under SR as I was terminal at the time, had an emergency transplant which bought me some time and my medication although keeping me alive is killing me.

    There is nothing about a review it tells me that I have to make a new claim for PIP, does this then mean I then have to claim on the new system as in have 4 points for a daily living category with all the new rules, or does that only apply to new people claiming.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 2,042 Championing

    Morning luv pink , I’ve . always got a GP letter too , in fact I have one from years ago which says my condition is chronic with poor prognosis .

    It says on the form not to get a gp letter though. It’s all really confusing as I have heard some people are getting review forms with 89 pages and others the AR1 form which I have .

    Regarding the concessions I watched dynamic duo and he said that we will not be subject to the 4? Point rule in future as we are on file as a claimant for 6! Years even if we lose pip as they the assessor looks back at our previous report. Obviously not agreeing to the new Keir two tier idea but I keep reading that the concession will only be for a few years and it’s a trick . I can’t understand it at all . Hope this makes sense and brain fog is bad and my phones acting the same as my brain right now 😂

  • Martinp
    Martinp Online Community Member Posts: 245 Empowering

    it’s doing my head in too, people on here say we are not protected but government do. Don’t know what to think, just making me worry more and more

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 2,042 Championing

    I don’t understand after this almost brought the government down ( may be a bit dramatic here) how they would trick the MPs who started the amendment. Surely the 126 rebels are all stupid ? Not that I trust the Labour government at all but look at the backlash . And regarding the two tier system, it shows that the rebels were only interested in saving their seats with the current claimants. They aren’t interested in the future claimants as right now the voters who are healthy are not thought to be interested in pip at the moment. Obviously that doesn’t include those on DLA or children. But that seems to be their thinking, including Meg hillier . IMO

  • MW123
    MW123 Scope Member Posts: 1,472 Championing
    edited June 29

    I asked my MP yesterday, if it’s already been decided that current PIP claimants won’t be affected, why the rush to legislate before the consultation even ends on 30 June? Voting on the Bill the very next day undermines the entire process.

    It would make far more sense to consult thoroughly on the proposed changes to PIP and bring forward legislation only once that process is complete, so that all elements are considered together, transparently and fairly.

    It’s clear this is about locking in savings early so Rachel Reeves can bank the figures for her next budget.

    While the government claims existing PIP recipients are protected from the new rules starting in November 2026, this is not a permanent safeguard. The exemption only applies at the outset, and there’s no firm commitment that current claimants won’t be reassessed under the new criteria in future.

    This isn’t genuine protection, it’s a delay, designed to defuse opposition while quietly embedding long term cuts. Once the Bill is passed, any future amendments to PIP criteria will have to work within its framework, not challenge it. If the Bill is halted, there’s still a chance to shape the entire package properly.

  • happyman
    happyman Online Community Member Posts: 89 Contributor
  • chiarieds
    chiarieds Online Community Member Posts: 17,155 Championing

    Hi @Trevor_PIP - Please see: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/fraud-and-error-in-the-benefit-system-financial-year-2023-to-2024-estimates/fraud-and-error-in-the-benefit-system-financial-year-ending-fye-2024

    This is said about PIP overpayments:

    'The Personal Independence Payment overpayment rate was at the lowest recorded level of 0.4% (£90m) in FYE 2024, compared with 1.1% (£200m) in FYE 2023, which was a statistically significant decrease.'

    [Fraud was 0.0%, whilst DWP official error in underpayment was 0.4%]

    Yes, I'd read there was a small trial also looking at PIP claimants bank accounts, tho the DWP seem to be looking to test UC, Pension Credit & ESA where 'incorrect payments are currently the highest': https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-authorities-fraud-error-and-recovery-bill-2025-factsheets/dwps-eligibility-verification-powers-in-the-public-authorities-fraud-error-and-recovery-bill-factsheet#how-will-it-work

    Undoubtably during the Covid-19 pandemic there were criminals fraudulently claiming UC. But, & this is just my personal opinion, whilst even some of our members have made errors & we always say to let the DWP know about their genuine mistakes asap, such errors are a far cry from actual benefit fraud. I'll leave it there.

  • deelee
    deelee Scope Member Posts: 68 Contributor

    Starmer seems very keen on AI to help people work and a young man I know who lives next door to me, said that AI is going to make one person work as fast as 3. I have a horrid feeling that AI will assist UC / PIP assessments really fast in the future. Everyone loves how fast things are done. So Perhaps they will be able to meet the demands of assessing new claimants and old alike easily in the future. This really unnerves me.

  • Holly_Scope
    Holly_Scope Posts: 3,780 Scope Online Community Coordinator

    This was an interesting read. Specifically "Getting it right is more important than ploughing on with a package which doesn't necessarily achieve the desired outcome." Remaining hopeful…

    Starmer says he was 'heavily focused' on world affairs before U-turn on welfare

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,542 Championing

    Some mps putting more admendments on Monday hopefully stop Tuesday this needs stopping one it's a money bill two when timms finishes up writing pip in 2028 ? They can change at any time obviously they will change 4 point rule for everyone 5 it's not fair for other people who have disabilities and they will get us all in the end I've emailed lidsey hoyle few times and many other mps say vote against it's a trap we literally have today tomorrow

    Screenshot_20250629_124053_Chrome.jpg Screenshot_20250629_124102_Chrome.jpg Screenshot_20250629_124114_Chrome.jpg Screenshot_20250629_124128_Chrome.jpg
  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,542 Championing

    Me too AI will take over many jobs this is why I believe they know what's happening and how many be unemployed so they are desperately trying to stop the availability they have plans even money we must be one step ahead cash is king let's hope these admendments tomorrow stop the bill

  • Zipz
    Zipz Online Community Member Posts: 3,230 Championing

    I wouldn't email the Speaker. His function is to defend the powers of an elected House of Commons (despite some rum MPs) against their being overwhelmed by the Government. The Speaker will make up his mind about the selection of ammendments and whether this will proceed as a money bill as the Government expect because I think words to that effect are on Tuesday's Order Paper in consultation with officials of the House with an expert knowledge of procedure.

    I hope there are worthy ammendments tabled.

  • mawempathy
    mawempathy Online Community Member Posts: 150 Empowering
    edited June 29

    The only number i know is what the government says, 1,000 people are being added to PIP every day. That's 365,000 extra PIP claimants being added every year. Do you think the welfare system can sustain these numbers? Let's say claims average out at about £1800 per month in overall benefit payments, that's about £8bn a year more.

    I don't know what percentage of claims are from dishonest people. I do find it hard to believe 365,000 new people are becoming disabled every year. But even if these are all genuine cases, then we're going to have to accept harsher conditions like vouchers and cuts to LCRWA and PIP. Taxpayers cannot sustain £8bn+ a year, every year, more being spent on benefits. It's just the reality of the situation.

  • Zipz
    Zipz Online Community Member Posts: 3,230 Championing
    edited June 29

    I see your point. However, the Government make it sound as though all these people are on high rate PIP forever. Many might be entitled to standard rare, perhaps one component, whilst recovering from major surgery. These claims might be very The Government don't say how many people give up PIP when their circumstances change.

    Also, why should claims average £1800 per months. I should be so lucky! No all PIP claimants claim UC.

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 1,009 Championing
    edited June 29

    This is probably my last reply, as whenever I hear I know this and that person it usually makes me turn away immediately, as people on benefits usually dont advertise they on benefits as its not something to boast about. So I am not going to comment on your gym comment, but the financial number, that 34 billion isnt the cost of the increase, its the projected total increase in entire pip expenditure, it also should be looked at as a % of GDP, not as a real number.

    The country can comfortably afford it, its obvious it can, we happily pay for triple lock on pensions and that is far more expensive than PIP will ever be. The issue isnt spending too much money, its not taxing enough, wasting money on vanity projects, and silly policies that are losing us 10s of billions a year such as leaving the EU. You couldnt make it up, we lose the EU workers, and then their solution to solve this workforce problem is to try and force disabled people in to jobs they cant do.

    You still have ignored whats been said a few times in this thread now, about the state of the health service and other factors on the increase.

    So what happens when the DWP do what you wish, and kick yourself from PIP?

    The country has an issue with blaming the wrong people for bad governance, first it was the EU, then the immigrants, and now PIP claimants.

    Your logic is, that if claims increase, it must mean its fraud, like ill health is something that is predictable and steady, you completely ignoring all social and public service factors.

    to try and explain to you again about cost of living, there will be people who on paper qualify for benefits, but dont claim because of pride and not in desperate need of the money, they may then fall on hard times, and out of necessity then put a claim in, there is likely quite a lot of disabled people who on paper would qualify but dont claim PIP.

  • mawempathy
    mawempathy Online Community Member Posts: 150 Empowering

    Yes, that's why I averaged down the cost to £1800 a month. Reeves likes to pretend the almost full possible £2,100ish monthly figure is the average. The numbers claiming PIP are not really tailing off, but yes, certainly entitlements can reduce in future assessments and awards. Bottom line though, official statistics show costs are ballooning.

  • mawempathy
    mawempathy Online Community Member Posts: 150 Empowering

    16% of PIP claimants are in work, so the vast majority claim UC.

  • mawempathy
    mawempathy Online Community Member Posts: 150 Empowering

    I think the numbers are very telling. I don't understand why genuine claimants want to defend it, because those defrauding the system are the ones making it unsustainable and so much more difficult for people with real disabilities.

    It is appalling they are not putting in place measures to catch and prosecute those who are defrauding the welfare system. The easy option is just hammer everyone, and that's the sledgehammer they are deploying now. It's heartbreaking that really vulnerable people are being made to suffer so much.

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,542 Championing

    I emailed him 3 times do they have to accept the admendments??

This discussion has been closed.