Scope's reply to the governments planned concessions to the green paper.

Options
1464749515256

Comments

  • JasonRA
    JasonRA Online Community Member Posts: 297 Championing

    We are literally the ONLY COUNTRY in Western and Northern Europe which actively places Disabled people in a negative light.

  • MadMilan2019
    MadMilan2019 Online Community Member Posts: 146 Empowering

    Then that is a cause for hope isn't it?

    Can you tell us more detail JasonRA please?

    What thee European counties did etc., and so we ight be able to lobby our MPs, and make it a cross party agenda that

    disabled people deserve

    benfits, acceptance, work ontheir terms and the help they need etc.

  • Danny123
    Danny123 Online Community Member Posts: 158 Empowering
  • JasonRA
    JasonRA Online Community Member Posts: 297 Championing

    I know people don't like using AI for such things I know I'm sceptical but I did ask for views on Mental Illnesses within certain European countries.

    Only in Britain does this nonsense go on and my suspicion is that it's a sign of a low trust society and a society influenced by Media narratives.

    I believe that a mixture of all the countries mentioned barring Britain is the way to go, rehabilitation, support, dignity with the avenue to open up potential to do something.

    Mental Health and Benefits (02.07.2025 20_17).png
  • geckobat
    geckobat Online Community Member Posts: 160 Empowering

    There's such a thing as toxic positivity, and telling people who are concerned not just for their security but their very lives that they should basically be the better person or look on the bright side is frustrating.

    It's hard all round and people have different situations and outlooks, and I don't wish terrible things on people but it's hard to feel pity seeing any of these politicians under stress, considering what they've been doing to millions with a smile and a smirk.

  • uruloki
    uruloki Online Community Member Posts: 13 Contributor

    Evening everyone this is my first post in this forum, I lost my left leg below the knee seven years ago and continue to have various medical conditions. I wish my first post could be under more positive circumstances, I have read all kinds of different stories and articles in the last few months and I might have some details confused but this where I am at right now and I need an outlet for all the information floating around in my mind. 

    I think the reading in parliament yesterday was a cynical setup and the last minute concession was actually part of the plan to get the bill through, it’s a smoke screen in my opinion so that the bill goes ahead next week and is passed on to lords as money bill as planned. 

    will that negate the right of recourse in relation to human rights and or appeals? 

    Does it mean the government can make any changes they like to the descriptors that measure how disabled people are without any recourse to effectively appeal under law?

    It feels like they are stripping disabled people’s human rights away, Starmer made his career off the back of creating human rights and according to his old law firm the  bill was actually illegal until the concession was made. 

     It feels like disabled people are being dehumanised in a very sneaky way, some of the experiences I read today from people who are not visibly disabled having conversations about what people really think about disabled people are shocking and frightening. 

    We are seen as  a burden to society so  people will look the other way so the problem is dealt with.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 2,030 Championing

    The harder they feel defeated the better so they don’t come for us again 🤞. By the time of Timms report Rayner will probably be PM I wonder if she hates the disabled ?

  • Passerby
    Passerby Posts: 716 Championing

    As they've now failed to get their damn 4 pts based scoring system through, I don't think they would be bothering to rush to scrap the WCA anytime soon, as it's not fit for their purpose.

  • chiarieds
    chiarieds Online Community Member Posts: 17,101 Championing

    Hi @uruloki - good to have you join us. I think we're all feeling a bit battered & bruised with recent events (& the media mainly hasn't helped), & yesterday's debate before the vote on the bill's 2nd reading was difficult to watch, from the MPs that spoke from their conscience, & those that spoke with feeling about their disabled constituents giving them a voice, to the actual vote.

    Yes, a couple of us have been thinking the same about this Bill that they want it certified as a money bill, & now the clause about PIP has been removed, it's perhaps possible (& why did it say underneath the Bill that it was expected to be certified as a money bill before the actual debate?)

    We have to hang on to the fact that there are a lot of good people fighting our corner, e.g. charities for disabled people & organisations that have helped with their unbiased opinion. The fight's not over yet.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 2,030 Championing

    Hi chiaried and uruloki,

    I was surprised it was Rayners idea to scrap the pip part of the bill . Did she have the power to make that decision or would it have needed starmers permission? I think she’ll be PM at some point and I’m trying to work out how she’ll treat us . I remember an interview she gave regarding disability benefits pre election and she came off very well . I think I’ll look it up tmrw how she’s voted in the past

  • LouCie61
    LouCie61 Online Community Member Posts: 98 Empowering

    As much as I can't stand her and what she's put us through, it troubled me to see Reeves crying today (and it is clear she'd been crying a lot)

    When we lose the basic human emotions of being able to relate to someone who is clearly in distress then we really are hurtling down the slippery slope.

  • chiarieds
    chiarieds Online Community Member Posts: 17,101 Championing

    Sort of think scrapping the PIP part of the Bill because of the backlash the Gov't had received might have been part of the already decided plan a few days ago @secretsquirrel1 - I'd have liked to have been a fly on the wall to have heard what they discussed!

    I'd like to think the rebels are still watching too; they have a week to reflect & regroup. The proposed 4 point rule was calculated to cut as many disabled people as possible from PIP, but I don't think they'd contemplate this again, tho I'm definitely concerned that Timms review might not be co-produced with disabled people & the charities that support them, if the Green Paper 'consultation' was anything to go by.

    Increasing NI contributions has hit businesses, & particularly small businesses according to the Federation of Small Businesses. This Gov't certainly doesn't seemed to have thought clearly, or listened.

    The Gov't needs to build up trust with us all. On that note, Full Fact noted,

    ''In July 2024, Sir Keir Starmer made a pledge outside Number 10, that the public’s “lack of trust” in politics “can only be healed by actions not words.”

    In saying these words, it seemed reasonable to expect trust-healing actions to follow. Unfortunately, this has not been the case.''

    & later,

    ''The Prime Minister has failed to respond to more of our correction requests than any other minister, after making claims about convictions, immigration, and interest rates.''

    Please see their full report on this Govt's first year: https://fullfact.org/politics/concerning-inaction-labour-government-first-year/

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 2,030 Championing

    By the time Timms finishes his report and I hope it has to be voted on it brings them closer to the next election. They’ll surely be thinking of that when they bring in charges as they’ve seen the backlash 🤞🙏

  • geckobat
    geckobat Online Community Member Posts: 160 Empowering

    I don't think it's necessarily a loss of emotion for somebody. I don't enjoy seeing her that way and I was quite surprised to see it. But I think it's hard to properly feel sorry for somebody who has been a big part of this onslaught without apparent feeling themselves for those they're trampling and it's understandable people are feeling the way they are to varying degrees.

    I'm not sure if she was in distress or just tired, but you do make a fair point too.

  • Ranald
    Ranald Online Community Member Posts: 1,610 Championing
    edited July 3
  • Ranald
    Ranald Online Community Member Posts: 1,610 Championing
    edited July 3

    Can't be any worse than Marjorie Taylor Green interrupting President Biden's State of the Union address, or the New Zealand MPs staging a Haka in Parliament.

  • Santosha12
    Santosha12 Online Community Member Posts: 1,519 Trailblazing

    Quite. When Kemi Badenoch was pointing and calling her miserable, I really hope she couldn't see that RR was crying at that point. I don't think she was but I couldn't tell; really not a nice woman if she could.

  • Ranald
    Ranald Online Community Member Posts: 1,610 Championing
    edited July 3

    Having attended some very heated union meetings, I can only imagine how it feels to be in the Commons. Adversarial is definitely the word!

  • ThirtySixteen
    ThirtySixteen Online Community Member Posts: 57 Empowering

    I’m very sorry for the predicament you find yourself in. I hope you manage to get yourself out of it.

    But in my honest opinion if you find yourself depressed and crying while you’re in charge of a bus full of people then maybe you really shouldn’t be driving that bus.

    Just saying.

This discussion has been closed.