Scope's reply to the governments planned concessions to the green paper.
Comments
-
We are literally the ONLY COUNTRY in Western and Northern Europe which actively places Disabled people in a negative light.
4 -
Then that is a cause for hope isn't it?
Can you tell us more detail JasonRA please?
What thee European counties did etc., and so we ight be able to lobby our MPs, and make it a cross party agenda that
disabled people deserve
benfits, acceptance, work ontheir terms and the help they need etc.
0 -
0
-
I know people don't like using AI for such things I know I'm sceptical but I did ask for views on Mental Illnesses within certain European countries.
Only in Britain does this nonsense go on and my suspicion is that it's a sign of a low trust society and a society influenced by Media narratives.
I believe that a mixture of all the countries mentioned barring Britain is the way to go, rehabilitation, support, dignity with the avenue to open up potential to do something.
3 -
There's such a thing as toxic positivity, and telling people who are concerned not just for their security but their very lives that they should basically be the better person or look on the bright side is frustrating.
It's hard all round and people have different situations and outlooks, and I don't wish terrible things on people but it's hard to feel pity seeing any of these politicians under stress, considering what they've been doing to millions with a smile and a smirk.
3 -
Evening everyone this is my first post in this forum, I lost my left leg below the knee seven years ago and continue to have various medical conditions. I wish my first post could be under more positive circumstances, I have read all kinds of different stories and articles in the last few months and I might have some details confused but this where I am at right now and I need an outlet for all the information floating around in my mind.
I think the reading in parliament yesterday was a cynical setup and the last minute concession was actually part of the plan to get the bill through, it’s a smoke screen in my opinion so that the bill goes ahead next week and is passed on to lords as money bill as planned.
will that negate the right of recourse in relation to human rights and or appeals?
Does it mean the government can make any changes they like to the descriptors that measure how disabled people are without any recourse to effectively appeal under law?
It feels like they are stripping disabled people’s human rights away, Starmer made his career off the back of creating human rights and according to his old law firm the bill was actually illegal until the concession was made.
It feels like disabled people are being dehumanised in a very sneaky way, some of the experiences I read today from people who are not visibly disabled having conversations about what people really think about disabled people are shocking and frightening.
We are seen as a burden to society so people will look the other way so the problem is dealt with.
3 -
The harder they feel defeated the better so they don’t come for us again 🤞. By the time of Timms report Rayner will probably be PM I wonder if she hates the disabled ?
0 -
As they've now failed to get their damn 4 pts based scoring system through, I don't think they would be bothering to rush to scrap the WCA anytime soon, as it's not fit for their purpose.
0 -
Hi @uruloki - good to have you join us. I think we're all feeling a bit battered & bruised with recent events (& the media mainly hasn't helped), & yesterday's debate before the vote on the bill's 2nd reading was difficult to watch, from the MPs that spoke from their conscience, & those that spoke with feeling about their disabled constituents giving them a voice, to the actual vote.
Yes, a couple of us have been thinking the same about this Bill that they want it certified as a money bill, & now the clause about PIP has been removed, it's perhaps possible (& why did it say underneath the Bill that it was expected to be certified as a money bill before the actual debate?)
We have to hang on to the fact that there are a lot of good people fighting our corner, e.g. charities for disabled people & organisations that have helped with their unbiased opinion. The fight's not over yet.
1 -
Hi chiaried and uruloki,
I was surprised it was Rayners idea to scrap the pip part of the bill . Did she have the power to make that decision or would it have needed starmers permission? I think she’ll be PM at some point and I’m trying to work out how she’ll treat us . I remember an interview she gave regarding disability benefits pre election and she came off very well . I think I’ll look it up tmrw how she’s voted in the past
0 -
I am still thinking that the rebels are watching and any attempt to circumvent what was promised yesterday will lead to another fiasco next week when it comes to the third vote.
At the same time, the review can still be rushed or fudged and there is no guarantee that they will take on board things said by disabled people. Four points could absolutely come back at this point, and there will be no protection necessarily for existing claimants so we have to be alert regardless.
Badenoch struck me earlier talking about people 'frightened' by the risk of tax rises.
People who pay tax earn over a certain threshold, so they are probably not as tight to the poverty line as some of the people who have been not just frightened but outright traumatised by the last several months (and are still in limbo).
Whichever Labour MP said that if Reform win the next election it will be Maskell's fault also needs to stop passing blame and look at the real reasons Labour's polling has fallen. NOT LISTENING to constituents over things like child benefit, WFA, and now disability benefits, adding NI to businesses, only some of which can afford them. Targeting farmers. Etc. etc. None of this was caused by Rachel Maskell standing up and giving us a voice.
It's those who were loyal to the bill who should be ashamed.As for Reeves, I'm not interested in mocking her. I still think Kendall should step down. I don't have an opinion on Reeves in this regard except that red lines have to go and apologies are owed from the heart of government to all disabled people.
Side-note - the Tories were as bad, if not worse. The last time Tories stood up for the disabled was before Boris and Brexit purged the house of the last reasonable thinking ones. If this had been a Tory bill, it would've gone through with not a murmur. We need to credit the rebels as Labour MPs standing up for Labour values and not being swayed by the lure of the right.
6 -
As much as I can't stand her and what she's put us through, it troubled me to see Reeves crying today (and it is clear she'd been crying a lot)
When we lose the basic human emotions of being able to relate to someone who is clearly in distress then we really are hurtling down the slippery slope.
4 -
Sort of think scrapping the PIP part of the Bill because of the backlash the Gov't had received might have been part of the already decided plan a few days ago @secretsquirrel1 - I'd have liked to have been a fly on the wall to have heard what they discussed!
I'd like to think the rebels are still watching too; they have a week to reflect & regroup. The proposed 4 point rule was calculated to cut as many disabled people as possible from PIP, but I don't think they'd contemplate this again, tho I'm definitely concerned that Timms review might not be co-produced with disabled people & the charities that support them, if the Green Paper 'consultation' was anything to go by.
Increasing NI contributions has hit businesses, & particularly small businesses according to the Federation of Small Businesses. This Gov't certainly doesn't seemed to have thought clearly, or listened.
The Gov't needs to build up trust with us all. On that note, Full Fact noted,
''In July 2024, Sir Keir Starmer made a pledge outside Number 10, that the public’s “lack of trust” in politics “can only be healed by actions not words.”
In saying these words, it seemed reasonable to expect trust-healing actions to follow. Unfortunately, this has not been the case.''
& later,
''The Prime Minister has failed to respond to more of our correction requests than any other minister, after making claims about convictions, immigration, and interest rates.''
Please see their full report on this Govt's first year:
1 -
By the time Timms finishes his report and I hope it has to be voted on it brings them closer to the next election. They’ll surely be thinking of that when they bring in charges as they’ve seen the backlash 🤞🙏
0 -
I don't think it's necessarily a loss of emotion for somebody. I don't enjoy seeing her that way and I was quite surprised to see it. But I think it's hard to properly feel sorry for somebody who has been a big part of this onslaught without apparent feeling themselves for those they're trampling and it's understandable people are feeling the way they are to varying degrees.
I'm not sure if she was in distress or just tired, but you do make a fair point too.
2 -
0
-
Can't be any worse than Marjorie Taylor Green interrupting President Biden's State of the Union address, or the New Zealand MPs staging a Haka in Parliament.
0 -
Quite. When Kemi Badenoch was pointing and calling her miserable, I really hope she couldn't see that RR was crying at that point. I don't think she was but I couldn't tell; really not a nice woman if she could.
3 -
Having attended some very heated union meetings, I can only imagine how it feels to be in the Commons. Adversarial is definitely the word!
0 -
I’m very sorry for the predicament you find yourself in. I hope you manage to get yourself out of it.
But in my honest opinion if you find yourself depressed and crying while you’re in charge of a bus full of people then maybe you really shouldn’t be driving that bus.
Just saying.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 15.2K Start here and say hello!
- 7.2K Coffee lounge
- 88 Games den
- 1.7K People power
- 119 Announcements and information
- 24.1K Talk about life
- 5.7K Everyday life
- 398 Current affairs
- 2.4K Families and carers
- 863 Education and skills
- 1.9K Work
- 523 Money and bills
- 3.6K Housing and independent living
- 1K Transport and travel
- 880 Relationships
- 255 Sex and intimacy
- 1.5K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.4K Talk about your impairment
- 863 Rare, invisible, and undiagnosed conditions
- 922 Neurological impairments and pain
- 2.1K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.2K Autism and neurodiversity
- 39.1K Talk about your benefits
- 5.9K Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
- 19.5K PIP, DLA, ADP and AA
- 8.1K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.6K Benefits and income