Disability Benefit Cuts - Take action before July 9th.

18911131419

Comments

  • mrsBB
    mrsBB Online Community Member Posts: 303 Empowering

    I feel you apples, its an horrendous one that one, folk are petrified as it is

  • onlymeagain
    onlymeagain Online Community Member Posts: 265 Empowering

    It appeared not to go through but I don't really have a clue what is going on.

  • Andi66
    Andi66 Online Community Member Posts: 1,397 Championing

    It's giving me headache. That bloke by her bellowing ,good grief. Anyone from scope who could explain these clauses and what they mean fornus if passed

  • mrsBB
    mrsBB Online Community Member Posts: 303 Empowering

    OMG are we doing this for 38 pages of clauses 😶

  • apples
    apples Online Community Member Posts: 556 Empowering
  • apples
    apples Online Community Member Posts: 556 Empowering

    Same that bloke bellowing is giving me headache, that and I have no idea what’s going on lol

  • Andi66
    Andi66 Online Community Member Posts: 1,397 Championing

    By what I just read from benefits and work ,they have 38 pages to go through with clauses

  • mrsBB
    mrsBB Online Community Member Posts: 303 Empowering

    It will be midnight before we get to the ''real deal'' OMG what a racket and loud laughing, wonder what the joke is ?

  • mrsBB
    mrsBB Online Community Member Posts: 303 Empowering

    Yep apples that's what i just said lol, we are going have 38 pages of this !

  • mrsBB
    mrsBB Online Community Member Posts: 303 Empowering

    Off to grab some sanity, will be back later haha 😊

  • apples
    apples Online Community Member Posts: 556 Empowering
  • Andi66
    Andi66 Online Community Member Posts: 1,397 Championing

    Most of them weren't in there when the impact statements were being read out.so them on 90 grand a year, don't care how the impact this will have on our lives. Laughing and joking shows the disregard they show for us shameful

  • jasminehoop
    jasminehoop Online Community Member Posts: 51 Contributor
  • bton1968
    bton1968 Online Community Member Posts: 156 Empowering

    Gone out to vote for a 3rd reading of the UC bill

  • mrsBB
    mrsBB Online Community Member Posts: 303 Empowering

    Crunch time

  • jasminehoop
    jasminehoop Online Community Member Posts: 51 Contributor

    For anyone who can't access the article:

    Ministers have made another concession to their flagship welfare bill, over an amendment tabled by the Labour MP Marie Tidball in an attempt to enshrine safeguards for disabled people.

    Tidball’s amendment called for a series of protections, including that future changes to the personal independence payment (Pip) be co-produced with disabled people and experts; that the government commit to a clear summer consultation before new eligibility rules for Pip are applied to new claimants; and that measurable targets be set to close the disability employment gap.

    Ministers had already scrapped a proposal to tighten Pip rules for existing claimants, removing the clause entirely from the bill last week to avoid a major rebellion. It also delayed changes for new claimants until after a review led by Stephen Timms, the minister for social security and disability, concludes later this year.

    Speaking at the end of a debate on the report stage of the bill, which was called the universal credit and personal independence payment bill, but has now been renamed the universal credit bill, Timms said the government would accept much of Tidball’s amendment, calling it a “helpful checklist” for changes.

    This included, he said, Tidball’s suggestion in her amendment that his review work with a “disability co-production taskforce”, which would have a majority of representatives who either had a disability or were representatives from disabled people’s groups.

    Any conclusions on the review would be based on “consensus”, he said, adding: “The outcome of the review will be central to the legislation that follows.”

    However, Timms said he would not accept Tidball’s proposal for a 12-month timetable for the review, saying he did not want to “rush” a process scheduled to end in autumn 2026.

    It marks the second time in just over a week that the government has been forced to make big revisions to its controversial legislation, after a week of chaos in the Commons that left Keir Starmer’s authority bruised, forcing him to abandon a central plank of the bill.

    Alongside Tidball’s proposals, several backbench Labour MPs – including Rachael Maskell – have tabled their own amendments, with Maskell’s arguing that someone who has slipped out of and then back into the LCWRA eligibility criteria either side of April 2026 should still be able to claim the higher rate.

    The UN organisation for disabled people’s rights on Tuesday asked the UK government for details about the impact of its welfare bill, expressing its concerns about potential adverse effects in a rare intervention.

    The UN committee said it had received “credible information” that the welfare changes would “deepen the signs of regression”, and sought information on “any measures to address the foreseeable risk of increasing poverty rates amongst persons with disabilities if cuts are approved”.

    1000004342.png
  • mrsBB
    mrsBB Online Community Member Posts: 303 Empowering

    Its def mixed by sounds of it

  • mrsBB
    mrsBB Online Community Member Posts: 303 Empowering

    jasminehoop thank you for the link, will def read when I have watched this😊

  • bellatango
    bellatango Online Community Member Posts: 130 Empowering
    edited July 2025

    Back in the Commons, and we've had a series of votes on the reforms the government wanted to implement in the welfare system.

    They've managed to get the legislation through this step - next heading to the Lords - but they have still had some opposition from their own party.

    Some 37 Labour MPs voted against the government on one set of changes, alongside a handful of former Labour MPs who have been kicked out or left the parliamentary party.

    They, alongside the SNP, Lib Dems and other parties - but not the Tories - voted against the government.

    But Starmer's team still got their plans through by 332 votes to 135 on the big vote.

    Other amendments - from the likes of the Greens and Tories - were defeated by a greater margin.

  • Andi66
    Andi66 Online Community Member Posts: 1,397 Championing

    Rachel maskell bill did it go through? My brain frazzled with all this

This discussion has been closed.