General election - party’s manifestos published this week starting 10th june

13

Comments

  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 5,583 Championing

    Sir Keir Starmer consistently voted against welfare cuts for disabled claimants and the 2016 welfare reforms, be in no doubt about that.

    Those new laws are now in operation thanks to his colleagues who did support them. They are the reason Labour handed the 2015 GE back to the Conservatives.

  • Meg24
    Meg24 Community Member Posts: 390 Trailblazing

    No news is good news, he hasn't funded spending with welfare cuts like the Tories plan to do and there are no open attacks on disability benefits. I'm hopeful and my mind is more at ease now. Next stop, Jul 4th...

  • apple85
    apple85 Community Member Posts: 903 Championing

    Tory manifesto highlights (whole pages posted for context):

    IMG_0234.jpeg IMG_0235.jpeg IMG_0236.jpeg IMG_0237.jpeg IMG_0238.jpeg IMG_0239.jpeg IMG_0240.jpeg
  • apple85
    apple85 Community Member Posts: 903 Championing
  • Lostsoul13
    Lostsoul13 Community Member Posts: 137 Connected

    thanks for the highlights!!

  • apple85
    apple85 Community Member Posts: 903 Championing

    for those located in wales I’ll give the highlighter screenshot for Plaid Cymru manifesto either later tonight or 1st thing tomorrow

    I am also keeping my eye out for snp’s and reform’s manifestos

  • Meg24
    Meg24 Community Member Posts: 390 Trailblazing

    I am not worried about all the talk of work from Labour, it's election speak and until we get more information I don't think it's worth speculating. There are whispers they plan to scrap the 2 child limit which seems likely. Hopefully they will axe the bedroom tax too.

  • apple85
    apple85 Community Member Posts: 903 Championing

    thank you for your thanks - it’s much appreciated

    That labour manifesto was a particular beast to highlight


    I have some thoughts on the Tory vs labour manifestos but I probably won’t have time to post in length till the weekend

    I do get the impression that both the big 2 parties see the disabled as an inconvenience at best - the Tory plan for us is more explicit with little room to be misanalysised - but labour plan is vague, looks like their own reforms may be as big as the tories plan but we have no idea if they will be fairer on the disabled or even one up the tories (though I noticed on the financial breakdown no extra money is being assigned to welfare/disability so it’s probably not best case). Also some of the ‘language’ used in labour manifesto is downright aggressive and an insulting read for a non working disabled person

    In conclusion (in terms of a sales pitch from the big 2 to the disabled)

    • the tories are selling a difficult future for the disabled (no way to spin that otherwise)
    • Labour are vague on what they are offering (you’re basically buying based on faith and hope only, no facts, one of those mystery boxes essentially) - there’s very little on whether things could be getting better or worse for this community…..only that a large shake up will happen under them pretty soon


    are labour a better opinion than the tories - even with the vagueness, yes

    Is it a good idea to risk giving a labour a mega majority by only voting them to get the tories out - no………sorry I don’t trust starmer with a mega majority but a small majority I’m significantly calmer about


    from what I’ve read of the smaller party manifesto’s (excluding reform) is that it will be vital to get Lib Dem’s/greens/snp/some independents as many seats as possible (using research + tactical voting) so their are at least some mps around to hold labour to account the next 5 years (Tory and reform unlikely to be up to that task imo)

  • Lostsoul13
    Lostsoul13 Community Member Posts: 137 Connected

    the greens have the best manifesto - if the majority of people are voting labour- then it’s unlikely tories will win- due to fact the state they’ve been in last couple years- people have lost faith.. but I think majority of disabled people would vote a party that’s more friendly towards disabled people and benefits.

    If everyone on benefits voted green for instance they would be in for a good chance~


    I think like someone mentioned- no need is good news.. but it still speculated that they will consider the green paper.. labour that is-


    I think I rather vote pro disabled than someone that doesn’t mention pledges that aid us- and key the working class vote labour.. I rather give them a fighting chance. And who knows maybe working class are fed up of Labour/tories and try something new.

    Although it’s all about the working class~ I don’t even think Labour pledges were lacking pledges- I think it was a statement avoiding actually promising anything they know they can do.. tories promised bullet point statement so did greens.. imo

  • Scrumptious67
    Scrumptious67 Community Member Posts: 64 Empowering

    Thank you for posting these, really helpful and an interesting read with much to ponder.

    I'd like to know what any of these parties intend to do about employers who fail to abide by the Equality Act and disability discrimination because as it stands, the system favours the employer with all their resources whilst those who try to stand up for their rights are to scared, too stressed, too ill or too burnt out to even get through the lengthy process within the 3 month time constraint.

    Who is going to ensure that all employers play fair with us disabled people and who will hold them to account when they don't?

    Where are all these jobs suitable for disabled people coming from in the first place? The mind boggles!

  • poppy123456
    poppy123456 Community Member Posts: 64,456 Championing
  • apple85
    apple85 Community Member Posts: 903 Championing
    edited June 2024

    https://www.bigissue.com/news/politics/labour-manifesto-pledges-work-benefits-disability-rights-analysis/


    one thing that looks increasingly clear:

    Fill out the pip consultation if you haven’t already as labour obviously haven’t ruled anything out and as many of us us possible need to drum in whoever’s in charges skulls what a bad idea all proposed changes would be not only for the disabled but overall uk disabled productivity also!

  • apple85
    apple85 Community Member Posts: 903 Championing
    Screenshot 2024-06-13 at 20.57.13.jpeg

    I for one will miss Lucas as an mp

    I’m having so much trouble trying to understand why labour thought language like this and other snippets for their manifestos and press interviews are vote winners?

    Is empathy considered that big a flaw these days?


    I know a lot of you are so scared of the tories pulling off the biggest election upset in many of our lifetimes (esp with the daily Tory implosions) so will bury your fears, vote labour whatever and pray

    But I can’t be the only one scared of the consequences of starmer & co potentially getting a mega majority……esp as we have very little clue of what they’d do with it

    (I noticed they were very careful to not make many promises in their manifesto about disability and welfare as they can’t be accused of u turns - in a weird way I’m kind of appreciate the Tory’s bluntly saying in their manifesto that they plan to continue being jackass’s…..I know where I stand with them and I feel 100% comfortable with not voting for them)

    Would anyone with doubts over their current labour vote (and their labour mp/candidate isn’t a clear disability ally) consider a protest tactical vote for the smaller party best placed to take on both tories and labour (3rd placed or higher)?


    I know many of you still hold a grudge with the Lib Dem’s (even though as of may 2024 only 3 Lib Dem mps remained in parliament from the 2010-15 coalition class - just saying by default different party) and the greens realistically don’t have the support numbers to get more than a handful (though please provide me proof if I’m understating the green movement for certain seats) and snp & plaid Clyde only cater for Scotland and wales respectively (plus there are a few strong looking independents)

    If only the smaller parties could of come up with a tactical voting alliance/agreement as I’m looking around disability sites & social media and there’s so much differing opinion on whether to hope for the best with labour or to put in a ‘protest’ vote and if so for who

    I wish the disabled community could all get together and agree on a voting strategy for the whole bloc - could you imagine the voting power we’d weld if we were organised (and yes I saw a unicorn in the distance as I was typing that😝)

  • Meg24
    Meg24 Community Member Posts: 390 Trailblazing

    I just want the Tories out first and foremost. The last thing we need is another hung parliament leading to a coalition, they never end well and don't usually last long. If a Lab/Lib coalition only lasts a couple of years that might give the Tories time to regroup and they could even get back in. I'm fine with a large majority for the first term, they've got enough to do for a few years that I bet they won't make too many controversial changes. They'll get a smaller majority the second term when policies will really start to lock in. Starmer has socialist roots, the fact he can't say so openly is entirely the fault of the Toriea and their right wing media. Ed got felled for eating a sandwich wrong, can you imagine what they'd do to Starmer if he started talking about being nice to "benefit scroungers"

  • apple85
    apple85 Community Member Posts: 903 Championing

    firstly there is next to zero chance of a hung Parliament - every party has agreed out loud that labour already have tied up the majority, its now a question of how big (I will retract that previous statement if labour/starmer have the scandal to end all scandals but considering their ming vase election strategy I’ll eat my hat if that happens)

    Second everyone aged 79 or younger has only experienced one coalition in their lifetime and that one lasted the full 4-5 years and I think the tories would argue it ended well for them as voters were angry at the Lib Dem’s not them and they got a majority the following election

    I know you in particular Meg are particularly scared of the tories having another 5 years to enact their plans as it would muddy many disabled ppl futures so I understand why you are most likely voting labour and I respect that

    But as someone who believed in starmer till a year back I’m actually very upset I’ve had to come to the conclusion I have. As someone else on this forum mentioned a large number of ppl in this country has a friend or loved one that will be negatively affected by any changes to disability/long term sickness benefits so it makes no sense that being an election winner and I’ve been asking myself the same question

    For some reason far right voters are being seen as more ludicrous to labour than the sick, disabled and unpaid carers (which is the bigger minority) - even so starmer doesn’t have to talk nicely about us to gain these these far right voters (which reform are significantly better placed to attract the far right - no party has officially tried to attract disabled voter….we’re free agents) he could just ignore us

    Instead starmer and the labour top brass have used a lot of intimidating language towards us which if nothing else is totally unnecessary

    Even if all of this is an act and starmer still has all his socialist morals that means he’s been lying through his teeth and I question anyone willing to push their moral asid or hid their true nature to gain power

    I believe the simpler explanation is that if it quacks like a duck and waddles like a duck, it’s a duck!

    Hope can be a dangerous - from personal experience it can completely destroy you if you lose it or if it’s taken from you (if labour under starmer did continue down the Tory path it would probably be the biggest betrayal since Cameron as both should be disability allies - I have no expectation of sunak & stride actually acting like compassionate human)


    I really really hope you’re right Meg I really do because if my gut is right then the only ppl that may be able to still 100% relax are those not far off state pension age (which is the ‘safety net’ we all hope to get to one day) - finally please note that it’s a labour mega majority that worries me……………a 40-60 seat majority would be a significantly better outcome

  • Ross1975
    Ross1975 Community Member Posts: 1,062 Championing

    Hopefully this talk about mental health, economic inactivity, those who can work should work, and that there will be consequences for those who do not oblige, is just some tough talk so they don't lose the votes from people who think everyone on benefits are scroungers, and that those of us who genuinely can't work due to mental health or physical health wont be on the chopping block.

  • apple85
    apple85 Community Member Posts: 903 Championing
  • Lostsoul13
    Lostsoul13 Community Member Posts: 137 Connected

    thanks Apple85


    being from wales I still thing green is more pro- but it’s a step into the right direction- obviously just starting work the tax free threshold is something I’m interested in - and if I start full time less tax- even while permitted work..

    I’m just wondering if my vote would be lost or if everyone that would benefit from green, vote?

    I really appreciate you taking your time to highlight- it’s much easier to understand!

  • apple85
    apple85 Community Member Posts: 903 Championing
    edited June 2024

    thank you for appreciation

    As I said previously on this forum I was really tempted to compile a spreadsheet doc on the tactical vote and the protest tactical vote of all 650 seat constituencies (as well as the individual candidates that seemed to be disability allies) but no one seemed interested and it would be a huge undertaking esp if no one looked at it


    I noticed that many of the tactical voting sites have only used data from the previous general election (2019 and prehaps 2017)…………….when corbyn was in charge of labour (labour are very much a different party to corbyn era attracting different types of voters to each other though there is some crossover) - tactical voting on ‘ground zero’ (talk in communities) is also being ignored


    (Note to scope forum mod - delete the next part if it’s inappropriate to offer)

    If any voters want help looking into in depth data for their constituencies (in terms of past election result, more info on candidates and tactical vote/a viable protest vote) then I’m happy for any member to private message (PM) me with their consistency name and I’ll look into it (I hope long term forum members know me to be a good researcher), I’ll only give personal recommendations if asked and will stay as unbiased as possible - I only want members to make the most informed decision possible and one they are comfortable with