Labour doubles down on slashing billions from DWP's disability benefits bill

1246723

Comments

  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Online Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 3,857 Championing

    For perspective…

    2015 £12 billion cut to welfare spend

    2025 £3 billion cut to welfare spend

  • apple85
    apple85 Online Community Member Posts: 892 Championing

    here’s the mirror link for anyone wanting to read

    https://www.mirror.co.uk/money/dwp-benefits-changes-launched-54-34589279

    I have to ask those saying that Labour will have to pass legislation before enacting any of these disturbing rumours their reasoning behind

    for example when the tories wanted to launch major reforms to the uc there was a (too short) public constitution and then a couple of months to read through the responses and then they announced their decision………I don’t believe they required any bill or legislation to enact the reforms (and in the end a few months before the GE they wanted to change details on that said reform)

    I’m not an expect on bills and legislation and when they are legally needed so you all could be right (someone mentioned a green paper than a white paper would need to be published before any reforms to welfare payments and criteria which makes sense - but I do worry the likes of reeves will believe the existence of the ‘get Britain working’ white paper allows them to fast forward things)

    I don’t think consultations are a legal requirement before a gov announces final details to reforms - and even if it was the pip consultation process is complete and ready to move to the next step any day (the wca consultation will run for 12 weeks from the end of march then probably responses considered for another 2-4 months - so that process will be completed sept to nov 2025)

    But even if legislation is required this Labour gov has a massive majority. Even if tories/reform vote against (which would only be for reasons of spit if Labour plans are confirmed to be crueler than their own ones a year back) then you’d need a minimum of around a 75 Labour rebellion to down the bill in a vote of 2nd/3rd reading (that’s a massive rebellion needed in a vote that will be probably 3 line whipped and threats of the whip removed……….we are only 8 months into a 5yr term so basically it’s too early to have this level of descent- and if the tories swallow their pride on this and decide voting against only aids reform ‘game over’ is a cert) and lords will only be able to slow things down so much - the bill would reach royal assent in 6-18 months

    If legislation is required of course


    as I said before what will tip the scales will be the level of public backlash and/or number of legal cases taken up against the gov/dwp (if any)


    personally it would be wise for the disabled community to identify the 100-200 Labour MP most likely to listen and/or sympathise with our situation and start writing/emailing even if they aren’t your mp

    Right now the disabled community needs powerful allies (prehaps someone should try and get hold of Esther Rantzen - she has single handedly bent starmer round her finger and her fears have indirectly thrown the disabled under the bus (if you are paying attention to another bill) - my petty self thinks she owes us some support)


    sorry, off topic, rant over

  • mac99
    mac99 Online Community Member Posts: 31 Contributor

    theres a video on youtube by a guy who knows what he's talking about and he says labour has not said they will be taking money off people by making things harder to get.he says all that is in the press is absolute rubbish and just click bait.he says labour will make the savings that the tories promised on concentrating on benefit fraud alone.watching this video really put my mind at rest because he was quoting what has been said by labour and what he's saying makes a lot of sense.the channel is called a different bias,i suggest people take the time to watch it.

  • Ironside1990
    Ironside1990 Online Community Member Posts: 314 Empowering

    I think this is the video. Watching this has put my mind at rest.

    I don't know how to make the link clicky.

    https://youtu.be/Damd6GJapx0?si=l18LNFkPw4tN-yv9

  • apple85
    apple85 Online Community Member Posts: 892 Championing

    off topic but many of us can’t make sense of starmer and where he stands (some on here think he may be being influenced, some wonder if he’s a good actor) - some of his decisions as pm make no sense after reading about his history

    It is written by the times and I haven’t read the whole thing yet but I’ve read excerpts and it looks like an interesting read

    To reiterate I’ve posted this as a bit of fun gossip (no need to ask questions about what it means - it doesn’t matter in this case)

    IMG_8951.jpeg IMG_8952.jpeg IMG_8953.jpeg IMG_8954.jpeg IMG_8955.jpeg IMG_8956.jpeg IMG_8957.jpeg IMG_8958.jpeg IMG_8959.jpeg IMG_8960.jpeg IMG_8961.jpeg
  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 5,563 Championing

    100 percent we got this sars form is a request of all medical note or your reviews with DWP you can go back years !! And they have to do them imagine if we all requested they have to halt things but i really think we need to start pertitons email mps PM flood them with same email how our health is suffering at hands of goverment media scare tatics we are human beings and we demand to be treated so and we demand The equality Act is used at all times we need to start now

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 5,563 Championing

    I really believe they wont get everything thier trying to push through

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 5,563 Championing

    Ah ok yes if they take substanial risk out be me out start with new claimants then us but hopefully they will be pushed back so all makes sense when they said esa was going to change over 2028 2029 before bringing forward so it will come to us 2028 maybe

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 5,563 Championing

    Every year they have to highlight certain people ie rwanda look at that big thing oh we got planes blah blah that didnt literally take off elderly single mums now disabled workers farmers the lot id say its laughable if it wasnt true i got great comfort from jeremy john kirsty speeches they want to scare us its actually vile like a toxic relationship being bullied and terrized no more no way

  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Online Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 3,857 Championing
    edited February 2

    apple, what a fascinating read, thank you very much! Angela Raynor is pretty terrifying really.

    She served in Jeremy Corbyn's shadow cabinet including as a DWP minister then had a hissy fit when Keir Starmer tried to sack her. She now holds far too much power in that party.

  • FeistyPigeon
    FeistyPigeon Online Community Member Posts: 295 Empowering

    Got to say WhatThe, her workers' rights bill has been the best thing for ages, it has at least made a stab at rolling back decades of workers rights. You wouldn't have got that with many on the front bench of Labour. I suspect Starmer's intention is to keep her there to appease the left in his party + keep them quiet, rather in the role of Prescott. Although to be honest she's been more active than him, Prescott was just a loud voice to rally the troops, not much more.

  • FeistyPigeon
    FeistyPigeon Online Community Member Posts: 295 Empowering

    What brilliant ideas Catherine! I'm with you : ))))

  • FeistyPigeon
    FeistyPigeon Online Community Member Posts: 295 Empowering

    Not sure, maybe best to clog them up with SARS once they come out with the green paper? But the complaints about waiting and not knowing should go out now…

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 5,563 Championing

    Holly put up pertition to sign to send to mps i cant find it now habe a look for that and sign them holly said scope working on something

  • FeistyPigeon
    FeistyPigeon Online Community Member Posts: 295 Empowering
  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 5,563 Championing

    Hopefully loads of people sign i know they probley dont even look at them in debth but still something b

  • carbow32
    carbow32 Online Community Member Posts: 253 Empowering
  • poppy123456
    poppy123456 Online Community Member Posts: 64,463 Championing

    Those rules changed in April 2017 so that's nothing new.

  • apple85
    apple85 Online Community Member Posts: 892 Championing

    I know we don’t agree on many things @WhatThe but think both of us feels like something is off just perhaps not how it’s off

    I think you may be left wing in your political thinking whereas I’m more central (though I do have both significant left and right wing thought ‘sprinkles’ in certain topics - for better or worse I’m driven by a very blunt black/white idea of ‘fairness’ which gets me in trouble with both left and right wing ppl)

    It would be interesting to be a fly on the wall at no 10 & 11 right now!

    Posting the below link for you whatthe as you said you enjoyed the times article

    https://www.owenjones.news/p/keir-starmer-own-aides-say-he-isnt


    Political journalists at the times newspapers are right wing/far right whereas Owen jones is very left wing yet their theories on this are in the same ‘book series’ (not sure I can go as far as saying they are on the same page)


    just because you are academically clever doesn’t mean you are clever in all areas of life (for example I’ve meet a lot of ppl with the higher functioning levels of autism who’s iq is through the roof but have trouble navigating social aspects (I think that’s very common to differing degrees) - working in politics requires the skills to get your message across to thousands, to word things well (spin) and the ability to manipulate is a form of social skill…………..it is possible to flunk academically but thrive as an mp - I imagine being a human rights barrister is very much about facts and the black/white and in some way the skills required for being a barrister and a politician, though they look in similar areas of study are actually more like dawn and dusk from each other if you get my analogy)

    There’s still something about the ‘starmer is a puppet’ that still doesn’t full sense to me & I’m not sure of all the power player/puppet operators &masters as of yet. I do think that right now the Labour right has a firm grasp of the party - but I do wonder if something like major welfare cuts may be what triggers the Labour left to start trying to wrangle back some power in a major way - if starmer continues losing support the career politicians of the party will smell blood and we could have a full on internal civil war within the Labour Party (left vs right wing and prehaps also vs centralist)

  • apple85
    apple85 Online Community Member Posts: 892 Championing

    I say again - I think you would need to identify 100-200 Labour MPs to target with your efforts if you & others are really serious about this type of action

    Some Labour MPs are just too right wing to turn

    And ministers would be a huge win to get on side however as they are on the gov payroll they have to vote with the gov or lose their job and potentially the whip - identifying any of payroll who you think could be encouraged to rebel would be hugely difficult due to mp sense of self preservation

    (not impossible but you’d need to research profiles and make a very solid plan of action)

    I don’t know how serious the few members mentioning ‘taking a stand’ of sorts are but if it turns into a wider goal in the scope forum (if scope moderators are instructed to stop activism plans being discussed in detail on this forum - you may need to more locations online if that’s the case) then feel free to pm me and I’ll be happy to loan my research skills (I love a spreadsheet) but I don’t think talk has reached that serious a level yet (some of you may be waiting till the green paper is released before launching anything)