Upcoming changes to benefits

17810121388

Comments

  • Ranald
    Ranald Online Community Member Posts: 981 Championing
    edited March 12

    @HollisMcBobbery - Prison places for all!

  • HollisMcBobbery
    HollisMcBobbery Online Community Member Posts: 31 Contributor

    I think you might have misunderstood my post. It's satire. I don't want anything that labour are doing…neither does that journalist so far as I know!

  • Ranald
    Ranald Online Community Member Posts: 981 Championing
    edited March 12

    I know it's satire. I've been reading The Guardian for many years.

    "You have my word, that that there will always be a prison place for everyone". It was included in the piece btw. What Shabana Mahmood said at the dispatch box.

  • HollisMcBobbery
    HollisMcBobbery Online Community Member Posts: 31 Contributor

    I forgot the ending! I'm glad we are both on the same page. 👍

  • Moorgater
    Moorgater Online Community Member Posts: 65 Empowering

    Both your own experiences and why you oppose cuts generally are perfectly good things to include. Be polite but firm. And if this is a Labour MP something along the line of "if these cruel and unjustified measures come into force, the devastation caused to your party will likely resemble that caused to the unfortunate individuals affected" would be a good way to finish.

  • Andi66
    Andi66 Online Community Member Posts: 905 Championing

    Just emailed my mp, about the cuts , doubt he will reply he never does. I'm on esa and get pip . So does that mean when I do get uc it will cut to nothing. I'm so worried, about bills, and I have pets. I rather starve than see them go hungry. But I pay insurance on them . My conditions won't get better. Copd also effects your heart the stress probably make my heart give out. My other conditions is genetic so again won't get better. I am on antidepressants as it is . Have ptsd ,so all this is making things worse

  • stressed76
    stressed76 Online Community Member Posts: 70 Empowering

    I think i put something like this view of theirs (labour) on disabled people was similar to the view of the Nazi's & that they are pushing their own voters away. Think i ended it with be the Labour Party not Red Tories or Lie-bour.

    Might write again

  • snuggles65
    snuggles65 Online Community Member Posts: 78 Contributor

    I have been watching noah on you tube for a while now and for a while he had disappeared and I couldn't find him on any platform. I had is you tube come up last night and he explained the pip and UC cuts if that's what you want to call them. Please go and check him out. He does make sense. He really did put my mind at ease.

    Noah Bear Nyle Life on YouTube.

  • stressed76
    stressed76 Online Community Member Posts: 70 Empowering

    Ok wrote again but also apologised for writing again. I headed it as benefits & labour betrayal (god i need spellcheck)

    In it i pointed in our town her constiuents have been hit by WFA cut, 2 child cap, our farmers & now this. Have said its going to kill that its better to be a independent then lose her seat at the next GE. That i became disabled in my 40's had to give medicial evidence & in person assessment to get my pip & its got zero fraud.

    Also said its like the front bench want to destroy the party & that we voted for change & not more of tge same & there are already people planning the tatical votes to oust the 35mps who wrote the support letter.

    Think thats it.

  • stressed76
    stressed76 Online Community Member Posts: 70 Empowering

    Why are we infighting?

    I think its because of the few young idiots that film themselves saying look what i got making everyone else look bad & the fact people are scared.

    I have so called invisible disabilities, CFS, Fibro & F.N.D but also suffer with DDD, osteoarthritis of the spine, asthma, have constant disc bulges from prolasped discs, part of my spine has fussed togther, have cysts in my spine, have been advised to go to A&E straight away if i dont know ive pee'd as damage gone wrong way & could end up paraylsed, muscles going in my leg might be getting arthritis in my hands & waiting for adult autism diagnosis. Oh yeah depression NOS or something like that.

    So which catorgary to i fit in?

    According to labour the bin

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 901 Championing
    edited March 12

    I agree pretty much with everything you said, I too didnt sign the Scope form, as I feel there is no need for so much personal details to be given.
    Labour also have a history with deliberately misleading charities, charities were told one thing for ESA, and then another thing happened when it launched. Its difficult for a charity to recognise they are being duped I get that, but no charity should be publically approving things until they know its true, and that can only happen after the launch.
    Also agree the welfare changes are central to this Labour front bench, I have the opinion a lot of this was planned even before the election. But they are not as good at hiding this stuff as the Tories, what was revealed during that Labour meeting, Kendall having the confidence to let slip and so forth. Kendall also ghosted disabled constituents pre election. We also have one of the DWP ministers going on about how the Tories ignored the benefit spending cap with all the help they provided such as cost of living payments and increases linked to inflation, LHA increase etc. Its the female minister, cant remember her name. But she made it clear Labour think all of that was wrong to do. So of course now Labour are back in power LHA got frozen again immediately, PIP frozen in 2026 (and probably will be in successive years after), as well as cuts to LCWRA component on UC, which we dont yet know size although ITV say between 25-50%.
    Value of cuts in excess of double the Tory plans.
    Also Labour are talking the talk about getting back to work and barriers, yet they didnt copy the Tory idea of giving LCWRA immunity to assessments if they try to do a job. Under the Labour plans, that risk is back again.
    I tried to warn pre election, the appointment of Kendall, Reeves telling parliament her intentions, front bench made up of Tory lite ideologists, the horrific treatment of Corbyn, Labour's history on sickness benefits.

  • Vogue
    Vogue Online Community Member Posts: 62 Connected

    When they say cutting UC for people that can't work as I am claiming UC & LCWRA element will that be affected

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 901 Championing

    Its good he is making these comments, but needs to be doing it with intensity, as the government keep fuelling regular stories about these plans, to keep it fresh in peoples minds.

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 901 Championing

    Politics is dirty, these documentaries always happen around the time governments want to do a policy change, to soften up the public. Both the BBC and C4 can be leveraged.

  • Moorgater
    Moorgater Online Community Member Posts: 65 Empowering
    Screenshot_20250312-094530_X.jpg

    Jess Phillips MP, 11/04/2018

    Is she still standing up for people in need? Genuine question, I don't know the answer yet but if someone is in her constituency, it may be a good time to write and ask.

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 901 Championing
    edited March 12

    The reason they did the move, is the majority of all new legislation only applies to UC, and in the long term it saves money as UC has no SDP, TP would only last temporarily until eroded away. (for myself I calculated 4 (financial) years based on expected inflation, as I migrated only a few months before April, in reality 3 years and a bit).
    A lot of rules are more strict on UC as well, there is regular reviews for means testing, its easier and quicker for them to close claims, they can recover debt much faster and so on. There is also some efficiency improvements, although as I learnt recently also still some inefficiency in place.

  • charlie72
    charlie72 Online Community Member Posts: 148 Empowering

    Would these new changes to PIP criteria and eligibility not unfairly target those with mental health issues? Surely it's discriminatory and can be challenged in court especially if it puts us at greater risk of harm and deprivation, I'd love to hear what a solicitor or lawywer would think about this. Even if the plans get the go ahead how long would they take to be implemented, are we talking months or years? Iv'e just been reawarded my PIP for another 4 years and now like others I'm terrified this will be the last time I'll ever get it again. Like alot of people on here I have to use that money mainly to top my rent up, which it's not supposed to be for that, but to help with my everyday needs etc. I wish I could afford my own legal advice about all of this as certain groups who are supposed to be helping us are just putting out scripted responses to our concerns.

    I think I'm more worried about being reviewed again for PIP in 4 years and facing new criteria that I won't be able to meet, even though my mental health is terrible, but by sounds of things if you can answer a phone or type on a keyboard, or turn the page of a book, you'll lose points for PIP and won't get it. Absolutely ridiculous and evil these plans are!!

This discussion has been closed.