Welfare benefits news, possible changes & constructive ‘discussion - an ongoing thread
Comments
-
Ah, poppy - you and me are different types of thinkers (neither type being wrong - at the end of the day you have to do good for you - and personal mental health is hugely important)
hands up, I’m an overthinker - however I never feel I can relax until I’ve overturned every stone, till I have backup plan A, B, C, etc…….. and I hate surprises - I still kind of follow the ‘be prepared’ slogan from my brownie/guides days eons back.
I have done more reading since my post-a-thon a few days back but I’m delaying posting it until the 21st because right now the autumn statement is 2 weeks away and right now it is still possible to take a break from all this and better on the stress levels too (plus I want the time to process everything, draft things out with a level head - prehaps get a neurotypical family member to double check a few things)
I think the 20th-21st is going to be hard to keep the anxiety levels down due to anticipation so I may be able to write something that is somewhat reassuring then
however tonight is the 9th and honestly the best thing I can recommend is get in some good food, get under a warm blanket and watch a good series or film and next week try and spend time with your loved ones, your people or any other creatures you enjoy the company of (I know the reasons for anxiety aren’t going away but we can at the least delay it till we know more)2 -
I have read quite a lot of what you've posted apple85 - & I'm also keen on researching subjects that are of interest to me. I have had to skip some comments, however, as my brain isn't hard-wired into politics. I did read the PM's comments prior to the King's speech, & the speech itself; so far as I saw, it made no mention of either disability or benefits.Sometimes I wonder if it's in everyone's interest here to bring up politics; where it concerns disability, 'yes,' where it causes endless speculation (not you, but what 'may' happen), I don't think it is.I prefer facts, & read medical papers, tho even with many of them it can be seen that more research is needed, & sometimes there's bias, & it can be hard even deciding where the reputable sources may be, where are the best online journals, who are reputable authors, etc.? This has taken me years.So I'm with poppy that so much, so far, has been speculation, &, as a community about disability, we will have to wait to see what happens. I'm not apathetic, just a rather factual person.0
-
The thing is that politics is not actually that interesting to me but in the last decade the policies & rules created by the few (by mps who are supposed to protect and work for us) have impacted my personal well-being and affected my quality of life - and at the risk of sounding petty I’m not someone that lets things slide (in a weird way this is a weird personal manifestation of the ‘fight or flight’ response - how you watched ‘the queens gambit’ on Netflix? The ceiling chess scenes is kind of how my head functions through things that trouble me if that makes sense)
im a huge believer in fact & fact checking but sometimes (and I’m not necessarily referring to right now) you may have little time to react (and perhaps stop, overturn or reverse something) so waiting for 100% confirmation of fact may be unrealistic (depending what your definitions of ‘speculation’ and ‘confirmation’ are of cause - for the record I don’t think we’ve had confirmation yet but I’m not only concerned just with that but also the possible scenarios of any possible confirmation)
In the past few days I’ve been reading precedents, case studies, actual text of acts (imo our lawmakers need to learn how to write in plain English as it’s brain crushing to read) because I’ve been questioning if I can be more accurate alongside my general opinions and get closer to fact (even politicians have trouble ‘obtaining’ facts)
i believe that politics and the decisions made within it has a huge impact on the lives of the disabled in this country - in some scenarios to just wait to see what happens may be irresponsible
(I know I’m not explaining myself very well here, honestly I’m mentally exhausted and kind of hoping no one responds to this particular post -I doubt anything’s is going to happen for a minimum of a fortnight and I need to temporarily take myself away from all this - my tired head read chiarieds post in a way it may not of if clearer & more awake and felt a need to respond…………I may regret posting this after had a sleep so advance apologies)3 -
-
Actually a lot of interesting articles from disability news service:
https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/dwp-complaints-rise-by-more-than-a-fifth-in-one-year/
https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/nearly-three-quarters-of-calls-to-equality-helpline-relate-to-disability-new-figures-show/https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/work-coach-whistleblowers-describe-jobcentre-safeguarding-failures/
apparently just only 1.3k people respond to the wca reform consultation - which sounds really low to me considering there are millions of disabled people (and their carers) in the uk - I just hope that we don’t come to regret that the turnout wasn’t higher0 -
That is a worryingly low number. I think it may be because not a lot of people knew about the consultation. They didn't exactly sing the news from the rooftops. Or possibly people thought it wouldn't matter, which seems to be a running thread with political goings on these days.0
-
I think its disgusting how the disabled are treated and while I understand why they are doing it now bank accounts will be spied on :
0 -
Not confirmed in even a pencilled in way at this specific moment in time - many possibilities of how this may play out at time if at allRay212 said:I think its disgusting how the disabled are treated and while I understand why they are doing it now bank accounts will be spied on :2 -
My heart sunk when I initially read that figure (I won’t type my full feelings as potentially offending isn’t a good way to get a point across and motivate)Albus_Scope said:That is a worryingly low number. I think it may be because not a lot of people knew about the consultation. They didn't exactly sing the news from the rooftops. Or possibly people thought it wouldn't matter, which seems to be a running thread with political goings on these days.
I was trying to persuade others to fill in the consultation not because I thought the people reading our inputs would take account but because it would be harder for the gov to justify and/or bury things the more whom contributed
there are 16 million disabled people in the uk (not including support systems/unofficial carers) and less than 0.01% of those contributed to the consultation (one of the few opportunities the disabled community may have to ‘encourage’ the gov to somewhat shift directions)
- I think albus, you may of left a comment on the ‘possible bank monitoring’ thread that 3k responses to a gov survey wasn’t a reason for the dwp to jump to conclusions, I think your comment on that thread also have relevance here (I hope I understood your comment correctly and not misinterpreted)
perhaps the 1.3k who did contribute will be enough (or the Tory’s so consumed with infighting they get zero done in their possible last13 months - stranger things have happened!)
The only plus side is that individual that has taken out the legal case against the gov’s approach to the constitution
(I know many want to wait for 100% confirmation on certain thing before saying or doing anything but the window of opportunity may be gone by then - I understand wanting to wait before ‘acting’, but there’s no such limit on ‘preparation’ - hence my current research mode!)0 -
apple85 said:
Not confirmed in even a pencilled in way at this specific moment in time - many possibilities of how this may play out at time if at allRay212 said:I think its disgusting how the disabled are treated and while I understand why they are doing it now bank accounts will be spied on :
It was reported in several places including the telegraph. How do you know its not pencilled in ?
0 -
The telegraph, a newspaper article... will say no more. It’s all speculation at the moment.Ray212 said:apple85 said:
Not confirmed in even a pencilled in way at this specific moment in time - many possibilities of how this may play out at time if at allRay212 said:I think its disgusting how the disabled are treated and while I understand why they are doing it now bank accounts will be spied on :
It was reported in several places including the telegraph. How do you know its not pencilled in ?2 -
Yeah that's cool. Though I first heard it from Baroness Jenny Jones. Whether its bought in or not I thought it would add to the conversation. I mean that's what a forum is for isn't it? Most of the posts on this thread are speculative
0 -
Hi woodbine. I am new on this thread. Which changes are these?
0 -
Tonawanda17 said:Hi woodbine. I am new on this thread. Which changes are these?
There's no changes to anything as it's all speculation at the moment...
1 -
I can’t respond the way I’d like to on your postwoodbine said:I really think we must be ultra cautious about discussing "potential" or even imagined changes to the benefits system as it can cause real (not imagined) worry to some members here.
These changes if and when any of them happen can be ultra slow, PIP first became a reality in 2013 there are still adults today on DLA still not been moved across to PIP.
Like others I only worry about these things when I really have to as in when the letter comes through the door, until then I carry on as I am.
(I think after this post I’m going to take at least a weeks break from this forum because though I like reading fiction I feel like a few think I may be writing it too - I don’t like the thought of being more of a hindrance than a help, hence a self imposed time out - I’ll be back in time to keep an ear out on the autumn statement for whatever that may or may not bring)
i admit this forum does have a lot of people who go into ‘headless chicken mode’ (by that I mean they read one article or headline which puts the fear part of the brain into overload which is hard for some to shut that down)
but there are those bordering on ‘head in the sand’, reasoning in every way possible why something won’t happen and accepting in the case it does.
there is massive value in being able to not over react and stay level headed
but fear can sometimes be the catalyst for a more productive reaction
yes there is precedent of the gov implicating things at snails pace but if you look there is also precedent of policies being rush out at lightning speed (plus we have a very different breed of minister is gov now than compared to when PIP was first introduced)
and to be blunt I don’t see the point of ignoring a problem (even if there’s only a 10% of it actually happen) if there is any possibility that I could contribute to something that could help reduce the percentage odds of something happening or eliminate the possibility beyond all doubt.
some things in life do sort themselves out by themselves but some things need intervention
so I hear you when you imply that the probability of any of this happening anytime soon is close to zero and perhaps more people than I release have a backup plan if the unlikely odds do happen they don’t affect your ability to live a healthy, safe life
but I’m one of those people that needs to know I did every I could to eliminate any future possible problem regardless of its probability
plus those whom are prone to panic will find these articles all by themselves and discussion does help some some to work things through and calm themselves down (telling some to stop panicking more likely than not makes them panic more, also saying others could be imagining or creating things is also often counterproductive)0 -
Hi people, can anyone help? I believe I am affected by the PIP daily living activity 9 change which they are reassessing at the moment. I realise it is going to take until 2025 to review all cases but what I am not sure on is if I need to get in contact with DWP or wait until I hear from them to have my case reviewed. Anyone know pls?0
-
judie said:Hi people, can anyone help? I believe I am affected by the PIP daily living activity 9 change which they are reassessing at the moment. I realise it is going to take until 2025 to review all cases but what I am not sure on is if I need to get in contact with DWP or wait until I hear from them to have my case reviewed. Anyone know pls?
You do not need to contact them, they will contact you. They will only contact you if the extra points will mean a higher award. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/personal-independence-payment-changes/social-support-changes-to-pip-law-from-6-april-2016
0 -
Thank you Poppy. I think it would have put me into the higher daily living group which is what I am in now. I'll wait patiently!0
-
(Apologies in advance for the long post - I’m anxious and p***ed if I’m being blunt!)
I did not want to be back on this thread so soon (I was taking a break till the 22nd nov) but something has just popped up on my newsfeed that though entails scaremongering to the highest degree, the source that I’m going to post is directly from the government so it’s past rumour territory and onto ‘will it officially be made law or not)
there are further details on other articles but I’m not going to point those as that’s media like Birminghammail and Manchestereveningnews - if one of the big newspapers post with sources I may post then but I’d probably advise to avoid reading those right now
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/employment-support-launched-for-over-a-million-peopleI know many of the long term forum members are trying to reason with others not to worry about something till it’s fully implemented which I understand, and right now everything is rumours
However we are less than a week away from the chancellors autumn statement and though we can’t pen in future policy goals by Hunt/Stride, we are now getting snippets and previews and right now it looks like we are expecting the biggest attack on societies most vulnerable (including the disabled community) in the last 2 decades and I’m not using that statement lightly
(the only thing I can’t tell is if the govs aim will be implemented for legacy benefits or uc claimants only which may buy some breathing space/time for a new gov to reverse things)
I can’t even start contemplating the consequences if something like this goes ahead because there are certain topics the scope forum does not like us to discuss regardless of right or wrong and that needs to be respected.
For a few weeks now I’ve been remembering an old childhood memory - when I was younger there was a children’s animation called ‘the animals of farthing wood’ (got so big I think Harrods (or similar) in London had an themed animatronic window display over one Xmas) - anyways one of the particular scenes that seems to imprint to memory is a certain hedgehog scene……..
I think I’m remembering that scene because the majority of the disabled community in my viewpoint seem to be acting like those hedgehogs (who roll up as a defense mechanism - may be effective against other animals but useless against certain man made inventions) ……….. yes hedgehogs have little feet and can’t move fast to escape things…………but in that scene the hedgehogs were better off trying to move towards safety (somewhere better) even though the odds of success were minimal than if they rolled up in balls (where in comparison odds of success would not exist)
(I hope the above analogy made sense in a gentler way than just being blunt)
my honest thoughts are yes, in the past in the ids era, the implementing of new policies took and is still taking a month of Sundays
however since sunak has taken over, him and his ministers have been a total different beast - one without compassion and willing to rush things through no matter how badly thought out.
An example of this is the following bill - https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3429/stages (believe me the last thing I wanted to do is post this as an example but it best illustrates to point I’m trying to make)
this new law got rushed through much quicker than it should of done given the sensitive subject and the only reason why the law implementation is being held up is because human rights lawyers and the courts have gotten involved.
it’s a post for another day but there are several cases where the court of appeals/supreme court has reversed or amended part of the welfare criteria/laws, which was often triggered by 1 or a group of normal claimants initially taking something to the upper tribunal stage of appeal
quick examples (not necessary success but still trying) of this being:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/money/24606469/benefits-personal-independence-payments-department-for-work-pensions/
https://inews.co.uk/news/legacy-benefits-court-case-explained-appeal-result-meaning-dwp-2091448
so for those saying you won’t worry about it till your hit with it, it’s great you can ignore it or your not worried because you have a backup plan - that’s great for you but doesn’t help anyone else.
the reality is that if the worst gets announced at the chancellors autumn statement this will mentally & psychologically effect numbers of existing claimants regardless off whether it actually gets implemented or not
hence why I’ve been crying out for months for this community to find a way to fight back, create some backlash and stop being easy targets for departments like the dwp to take aim at for the sole reason of balancing books
and why I again ask disability charities when actual action (in additional to media quotes that are all to easy for politicans to ignore alone) in terms of legal action finally going to be taken???
(in my recent readings i stumbled across the term ‘Democide’ - I wonder that along with what we now know from the Covid enquiry and dwp policy over countless years is this a term that the disabled community has been victim of for a couple of decades now?)1 -
From the times (more reputable than the Birminghammail) - part of me doesn’t want to post as it is scary but people have a right to know what may happen so they have as much possible time to create backlash/fight/try and stop it from happening if that’s a possibility:Benefits claimants who refuse to look for a job will lose their right to free NHS prescriptions, dental care and help with energy bills under a “whole state” approach to forcing people back to work.In a trial, sick notes will be approved by the benefits system rather than doctors. Patients will be treated by therapists working for the Department for Work and Pensions, which could cut GPs out of the process.Under a “stick and carrot” approach to getting people back to work, Jeremy Hunt is promising a big expansion of support schemes, such as life coaches for the long-term sick, and is threatening “consequences” for those who fail to take jobs.The chancellor will use the autumn statement next week to set out a “back to work plan”. Business is struggling with a million vacancies at the same time as a record 2.6 million people are off work because of long-term illness.A £2.5 billion package will offer talking therapies to 380,000 more people and will double a “universal support” scheme that began in March. It will now offer help with debt, addiction and relationship problems to 100,000 people.Mel Stride, the work and pensions secretary, has argued that these schemes can pay for themselves by getting people back to work. They will “help more people start, stay and succeed in work. We know the positive impact work can have, not just on our finances, but our health and wellbeing too,” he said, adding: “Our message is clear: if you are fit, if you refuse to work, if you are taking taxpayers for a ride, we will take your benefits away.”At present people who refuse to take a job or attend interviews and coaching can have their benefits docked. But ministers want go further and shut benefits claims entirely if people have been “disengaged” for six months. This would mean tens of thousands of people not only losing all benefits but other state services where eligibility is linked to receipt of benefits.These include free prescriptions and dental care, legal aid and help with the costs of using courts and visiting prisons, help from energy suppliers, funeral payments, cheaper mobile phone packages and travel discount schemes. The sanctions will not apply to claimants with children or disabilities.“We’re serious about growing our economy and that means we must address the rise in people who aren’t looking for work,” Hunt said. “These changes mean there’s help and support for everyone — but for those who refuse it, there are consequences too. Anyone choosing to coast on the hard work of taxpayers will lose their benefits.”Ministers are prepared for criticism from health campaigners, but a government source insisted: “The question taxpayers will ask is, why if someone is fit and able — with plentiful vacancies, with 18 months of support available, and still completely refusing to engage — should they be shelling out to pay their benefits, and the extras that many will look upon quite enviously?”The Times revealed in the summer that Stride was pushing for reform of the “fit note” system after becoming frustrated that GPs were signing off work almost everyone who asked, after consultations lasting only seven minutes.Today sees the beginning of a “WorkWell” service where the benefits system will directly employ occupational health specialists and mental health counsellors to help people back to work. Under trials in 15 areas, people wanting a fit note will be referred to this service for assessment and treatment designed to get them back to work.Stride has said it is crucial that his department is “in the driving seat” because an overstretched NHS has little incentive to focus on people getting back to work. Successful pilots could lead to GPs being out of the “fit note” system altogether, which government sources argue would ease pressure on family doctors.Victoria Atkins, the new health secretary, said: “Tailored work and health support initiatives can help break down the kinds of barriers that can make finding and staying in a job more difficult for those with mental health conditions. Backing them with further investment means they’re more widely available, enables personalised help and will get thousands back to work by overcoming any issues that may be preventing them from fulfilling their career potential.”
Edit: at least the bbc has started covering these things (kind of buried but it’s a start)1
Categories
- All Categories
- 14.9K Start here and say hello!
- 7K Coffee lounge
- 81 Games den
- 1.7K People power
- 103 Announcements and information
- 23.5K Talk about life
- 5.5K Everyday life
- 286 Current affairs
- 2.3K Families and carers
- 857 Education and skills
- 1.9K Work
- 501 Money and bills
- 3.5K Housing and independent living
- 1K Transport and travel
- 865 Relationships
- 253 Sex and intimacy
- 1.4K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.4K Talk about your impairment
- 858 Rare, invisible, and undiagnosed conditions
- 916 Neurological impairments and pain
- 2K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.2K Autism and neurodiversity
- 38.2K Talk about your benefits
- 5.9K Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
- 19.2K PIP, DLA, ADP and AA
- 7.6K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.5K Benefits and income