who can help after lies on pip claim
Comments
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.1
-
as an inside, if he is banned why are his posts here and was he banned due to not agreeing with the click on here which is obvious to us out herewhistles said:Sorry to disagree.
The assessor gave me six points.
The DM changed that to four.
But apparently that's rare so lucky me.
As an aside. I probably wouldn't be bringing up threads where the OP is banned. Especially with loads more to choose from.
(she says replying and contradicting herself)0 -
What is it with people on here at the moment.
Can't people have a different viewpoint?
Or worse voice it?
I'm sure admin would knock any clique on its head.
I get on with a few members, so what?
2 -
voice what u like just keep clever comments to yourself ?see it is simplewhistles said:What is it with people on here at the moment.
Can't people have a different viewpoint?
Or worse voice it?
I'm sure admin would knock any clique on its head.
I get on with a few members, so what?0 -
What clever comments?0
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.2
-
the dm goes on the report written by acceser so in fact, they do go on the report ?as to the rest of your comment i shall ignore it after reading so many posts from you to othersUsername_removed said:To get back on topic. No @redhead53 the DM does decide and are obliged to look at all the evidence. The job is made harder for them by the inability of the DWP to explain to claimants that focusing on medical evidence does not get you PIP. However there’s plenty of examples of DMs not following the recommendations in a HCP report and we already know that 16% of them go further against HCP`s at the mandatory reconsideration stage.
To clarify further I believe this forum can be read (if not posted on) when signed out/banned so in theory it’s entirely reasonable to respond to the original poster. They were banned as I recall for abusive responses and starting a separate thread making an accusation that would leave membership unsustainable. Chances are that if the OP was still a member you’d have been greeted with similar language. The reason their posts are still here is that there’s no reason for them not to be. They are not offensive. The ones which were have been removed. It doesn’t mean all of them have to be.0 -
The user and all related content has been deleted.0
-
Not all banned users will have their content removed, and we wouldn't discuss the reasons why members are banned in public but all banning is decided by the community team in an unbiased way and is based on breaking of community guidelines.redhead53 said:
as an inside, if he is banned why are his posts here and was he banned due to not agreeing with the click on here which is obvious to us out herewhistles said:Sorry to disagree.
The assessor gave me six points.
The DM changed that to four.
But apparently that's rare so lucky me.
As an aside. I probably wouldn't be bringing up threads where the OP is banned. Especially with loads more to choose from.
(she says replying and contradicting herself)2 -
a complaint to the director general of DWP gave me a new acessmant on the decision iITisword for word the assessors comments and views regardless of medical evidence ??no mention of it full stop so i conclude acessers report is the most important part nothing elseUsername_removed said:To get back on topic. No @redhead53 the DM does decide and are obliged to look at all the evidence. The job is made harder for them by the inability of the DWP to explain to claimants that focusing on medical evidence does not get you PIP. However there’s plenty of examples of DMs not following the recommendations in a HCP report and we already know that 16% of them go further against HCP`s at the mandatory reconsideration stage.
To clarify further I believe this forum can be read (if not posted on) when signed out/banned so in theory it’s entirely reasonable to respond to the original poster. They were banned as I recall for abusive responses and starting a separate thread making an accusation that would leave membership unsustainable. Chances are that if the OP was still a member you’d have been greeted with similar language. The reason their posts are still here is that there’s no reason for them not to be. They are not offensive. The ones which were have been removed. It doesn’t mean all of them have to be.1 -
Must be a full moon0
-
Why are some people so angry?
We are here to try and help, support people not cause arguments or making people feel worse than they are.
Please be nice to each other or stay off the site1 -
it seems others are right this site is for a few to boostUsername_removed said:@redhead53 it currently reads as those you’re looking for a fight with most everyone on this thread for a variety of reasons. Your experience is your experience. One anecdote does not make a fact.
I believe it’s possible to ignore posters on here. Please feel free to do so.
their ego.s while pointing out how others are wrong plus the click is clear ?so this site just a load of rubbish and you mate are a complete [removed by moderator] not once have you agreed with anything anyone says you just tell them no they are wrong [removed by moderator]
0 -
So sad0
-
Lol0
-
[removed by moderator]Username_removed said:Going to guess this is a friend of the OP or just the OP in another guise @debbiedo49. Do you want to explain what my job is?
Reported the post for language either way. Happy to apologise for being unaware that it was compulsory on web forums to agree with what others say even when they’re factually incorrect. I’m personally a fan of disagreeing politely. 0 -
This thread is turning offensive and will likely get closed.
When I queried someone replying to it, my concern was that it would do just that.
@Username_removed has let everyone know that bringing up an old post is fine. Oddly the anger has now been directed at him for pointing that out!
The other day I was accused of being a dwp spy.
Today part of a clique.
I am running out of hats to wear for all these new roles.
2 -
Stop it please. This thread needs closed0
![[Deleted User]](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027153/uploads/defaultavatar/nM12UT844LQMJ.jpg)
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 15.7K Start here and say hello!
- 7.4K Coffee lounge
- 103 Games den
- 1.7K People power
- 149 Announcements and information
- 24.8K Talk about life
- 6K Everyday life
- 481 Current affairs
- 2.5K Families and carers
- 889 Education and skills
- 1.9K Work
- 563 Money and bills
- 3.7K Housing and independent living
- 1.1K Transport and travel
- 632 Relationships
- 1.5K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.5K Talk about your impairment
- 873 Rare, invisible, and undiagnosed conditions
- 936 Neurological impairments and pain
- 2.2K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.2K Autism and neurodiversity
- 40.9K Talk about your benefits
- 6.1K Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
- 20K PIP, DLA, ADP and AA
- 8.9K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.9K Benefits and income