Green Paper Discussion (from 24th March, 2025)

1222325272844

Comments

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 4,724 Championing

    I don't know which one I'm on the severe top up not sure

  • Wozza
    Wozza Online Community Member Posts: 14 Connected

    Hi all,

    A quick question.

    I currently receive the LCWRA payment, for a few health reasons, but mainly as I hit one of the main criteria that seems to automatically qualify you for the payment, that being I can't swallow at all, all my nutrition is via Rig tube and I use a pump for the main part of my feed, this is connected 11 hours straight.

    If the proposed changes come in, will I lose the LCWRA payment as I might not get 4 points on any one descriptor, even though it's one of the few health issues that's on the DWP list for automatic qualification?

    Thanks,

    Warren

  • alexroda
    alexroda Online Community Member Posts: 127 Empowering

    im not sure, but that’s a valid point that I haven’t seen discussed yet.

  • steve69
    steve69 Online Community Member Posts: 52 Contributor

    Unfortunately at a rate of 1000 pip awards a day it has made this vital benefit unsustainable.

    I fear that a lot of genuine people are going to lose out!

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 4,724 Championing

    This is awful that you have to even ask this question ! Makes me so mad

  • Santosha12
    Santosha12 Online Community Member Posts: 711 Empowering

    I'm trying to get my head around it tbh. What I haven't done yet is read all the Green Paper which I need to do this week, plus other documents I think that related to assessments which are on here somewhere. That has to be my starting point.

    It's completely understandable being up and down because of it all. I really feel for you, all of us actually and I wish I had answers.

    I do know one thing. If all of this is passed into law (possibly by this summer although the changes won't start until next year) I am going to do a lot of thinking (already started that 🫠)/looking at it from different angles to see where and how it can be fought. I feel somewhat useless being housebound but whilst I've still got a brain in my head I'll do what my dad always said: use your brain. 😅❤️

    My survival (and everyone else's here) is important to me (and my dogs) and even though it is not important to the government, I hope I still have the fighting spirit I've had to summon it up like before.

  • Wozza
    Wozza Online Community Member Posts: 14 Connected

    Thanks for the replies.

    It's obviously stressful not knowing, my swallowing function isn't going to return, so they would have to completely ignore or scrap the current DWP criteria that's in black and white for situations like mine if they wanted to stop me getting LCWRA, which wouldn't surprise me given how they've acted so far.

  • Wozza
    Wozza Online Community Member Posts: 14 Connected

    In the green paper, 11.5-11.6 seems to mention it.

    Apparently, they are considering how this change would affect individuals who currently meet the criteria, and talk of 'higher rate unemployment insurance'.

    I have no idea what that is to be honest.

  • alexroda
    alexroda Online Community Member Posts: 127 Empowering

    are there any charities collating all the data/problems unthought by the government that these reforms will bring to claimants?

    I think @Wozza has one issue that has to be dealt with

  • alexroda
    alexroda Online Community Member Posts: 127 Empowering
    edited March 27
  • alexroda
    alexroda Online Community Member Posts: 127 Empowering

    It’s a bit confusing, and I’m not entirely sure this applies to your case. 

    the ubemployment insurance is time limited, so you will only be covered for a time of say 6-12 months

  • luvpink
    luvpink Online Community Member Posts: 1,789 Championing

    Can anyone tell me what is meant by 'substantial risk' please?

  • alexroda
    alexroda Online Community Member Posts: 127 Empowering

    scrapping the WCA is probably the dumbest thing they could do

    So many flaws.

    Bunch of incompetents mediocre c…

  • Wozza
    Wozza Online Community Member Posts: 14 Connected

    It definitely confusing!

    They really should have answers for all scenarios before bringing these changes forward, all they've done is create fear, confusion and stress for so many people

  • Middleton
    Middleton Online Community Member Posts: 242 Empowering
  • Martinp
    Martinp Online Community Member Posts: 39 Empowering

    I’d like to know what will happen to disabled people with enhanced mobility awards that can’t walk aided or unaided 1-20 meters or less. How are we all going to get to job centre and undertake work training programmes. Also even if I could get there it would have to be by taxi at £25 a go. They haven’t thought about so many things it scares me that these incompetent idiots are in charge.

  • Middleton
    Middleton Online Community Member Posts: 242 Empowering

    "In the context of the Personal Independence Payment (PIP), "substantial risk" refers to a situation where there's a strong possibility that a claimant's condition or disability, if not addressed, could lead to serious harm to their physical or mental health, or the health of others." 

    Here's a more detailed explanation:

    • Purpose of the Safety Net:The "substantial risk" criteria acts as a safety net in PIP assessments, ensuring that individuals who might otherwise be deemed ineligible for support are not left without the necessary assistance if their health is at significant risk. 
    • Focus on Severity:The assessment focuses on the potential severity of harm, meaning that even if an event is unlikely, if the consequences are serious, it can still be considered a substantial risk. 
    • Examples of Substantial Risk:
      • A claimant who is actively suicidal or at high risk of exhibiting violent behavior, and needs prompting to avoid harming themselves or others, would meet this descriptor. 
      • If carrying out a specific activity could cause a substantial and sustained worsening of a claimant's condition, making it unsafe for them to do it at all. 
  • Middleton
    Middleton Online Community Member Posts: 242 Empowering

    • Evidence Required:To establish a substantial risk, there needs to be strong evidence supporting the claim, such as involvement with mental health services, care plans, or other documentation demonstrating the risk. 
    • Impact on PIP:A finding of substantial risk can lead to a claimant being awarded the enhanced rate of PIP, ensuring they receive the necessary support to manage their condition and maintain their independence. 
    • Original Policy Intent:The original policy intent for "substantial risk" was for it to be advised only in exceptional circumstances. 
    • Current Application:The application of LCWRA risk has gone beyond the original intent. 
    • Impact on Labour Market Support:The application of LCWRA risk has excluded significant numbers of people from receiving appropriate labour market support to help them to move closer to work. 
  • luvpink
    luvpink Online Community Member Posts: 1,789 Championing
  • Wozza
    Wozza Online Community Member Posts: 14 Connected

    It just not been thought out, it's just a big payment they see going out that they can claw back.

    So I, and thousands of others will miraculously recover because the government says we're not ill enough anymore for payments, that's how health works right, someone just says you're not ill anymore and you suddenly feel better?

    Just have to laugh at the moment to be honest