Green Paper Related Discussions

17071737576148

Comments

  • jul1aorways
    jul1aorways Community Member Posts: 397 Pioneering

    Absolutely Catherine, haven't they just!! 😡

    That's good that you've decided to vote for the Greens too. 👍

    If Labour think that we can forgive and forget what they have done to us, I think that they will find that they have another thing coming! 😤

  • charlie72
    charlie72 Community Member Posts: 259 Pioneering

    Redo my calculations???? Well I have done, turns out I was wrong (apologies) but so were you, not 403 as you quoted.

    As of June 1, 2025, the Labour Party holds 404 seats in the UK House of Commons. This figure reflects a reduction from the 411 seats secured during the 2024 general election. The decrease is attributed to factors such as resignations, suspensions, and by-election outcomes. Institute for Government

    The current composition of the House of Commons is as follows:

    • Labour: 404 MPs
    • Conservative: 121 MPs
    • Liberal Democrat: 72 MPs
    • Scottish National Party (SNP): 9 MPs
    • Reform UK: 4 MPs
    • Green Party: 4 MPs
    • Plaid Cymru: 4 MPs
    • Democratic Unionist Party (DUP): 5 MPs
    • Social Democratic & Labour Party (SDLP): 2 MPs
    • Alliance Party: 1 MP
    • Ulster Unionist Party (UUP): 1 MP
    • Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV): 1 MP
    • Independent: 13 MPs
    • Speaker: 1 MP
    • Sinn Féin: 7 MPs (who do not take their seats)Parallel ParliamentParallel Parliament+3Reuters+3IPU Parline+3

    This distribution confirms Labour's position as the majority party in Parliament.

    Favicon

    Sources

  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 5,660 Championing
    edited June 2025

    jasminehoop, he's nothing like the PM's of the last 14 years, no!

    I wouldn't mind him resigning if it meant targeting the real villains in Parliament - the ones who stitched us up in 2012 and 2015 - now running around like headless chickens trying to sell DWP's 'new' plan for sick and disabled claimants.

    Existing rules for incapacity benefits for working-age claimants concern me more than proposals to cut PIP. I think we are muddling the issues presented in this Green Paper. I recommend that members have a read of past Green Papers, White Papers and policy.

    There are good reasons for the media to have fallen silent over the 2016 Act. You cannot pin that on Keir Starmer!

  • jul1aorways
    jul1aorways Community Member Posts: 397 Pioneering
    edited June 2025

    That one puts my teeth on edge too, having to look at the optiction and other members of staff so closely while they are sorting out your perscription and frame measurements out for you. 😬 It's not a good experience.

    The quality of our lives shouldn't have to depend on vicious, throughly irresponsible MPs, who are only capable of thinking about their own interests.

    I feel though, that will all the support we have from MPs and many other individuals and organisations that the rollercoaster is slowing down despite Starmer and Co. 👍

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    Morning Juls,

    I know how wiped out you would have been. How on earth would we be expected to work with ME . It’s like expecting a car to drive without any petrol .
    I think the wording in the tweak is so vague that taken in face value says simply to me if you’re in standard and get a 4 you’re ok (13%) and if you’re on enhanced but don’t get a 4 13%, like me) whereas you’d lose pip now you wouldn’t. So anyone on standard without a 4 loses , 87% of people I think . That’s just the way I read it but what they actually mean who knows. Now maths is not my strongest point but I can work out that it’s a majority of standard to lose , how can MPs think this is 10% . Even at 10% that’s people that are disabled as there’s less than 1% fraud in pip. Then of course there’s the tweak of TP to give time to apply for imaginary benefits . So we’d have no choice but to stay with uc basic as job seekers. Considering we spend most of our time resting how would we look for work ? MPs shouldn’t be allowed to vote until they know the true facts but instead they’re be pressured to vote without full information. This alone would surely not hold up in court ?

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    Surely a vote taken without full information would not stand up in court ? No proper consultation eithet

  • jul1aorways
    jul1aorways Community Member Posts: 397 Pioneering

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/2061580/keir-starmers-mask-off-premiership

  • Fuzzy200
    Fuzzy200 Community Member Posts: 52 Empowering

    I saw this article today.

    https://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/cost-of-living/dwp-modify-pip-universal-credit-31752994#amp-readmore-target

  • jul1aorways
    jul1aorways Community Member Posts: 397 Pioneering

    As we struggle to even function with ME it's impossible to look for work, never mind actually do any! It's like expecting to drive a car with no petrol AND a flat battery,cif you ask me.

    I think that 12 point tweak is unlikely to happen and like so many other things the Labour ministers say, there isn't enough detail to it for MPs to be able to make a proper judgement.

    The leadership will keep saying that only 10% of people on PIP DL will lose out because it suits their narrative. The actual number, as you've said is 87%.They don't want to admit to that as they know they shouldn't be doing anything like that in the first place.

    I think that it has made MPs feel even more fed up with the leadership than they would have been if Kendall and Co had been honest about the number of disabled people who are going to have their lives ruined with these policies.

    I believe that it's made MPs more determined to resist the leadership as they know that they are constantly trying to deceive them on what they are going to do to people on PIP, as you have said, a benefit that has a negligible amount of fraud.

    As we know, TP is a measily amount of money, as we've found out with the transfer to UC, which with the removal of PIP and all the other benefits etc. that it entitles us to, it will be nowhere enough for us to live on and will run out eventually.

    Even if it was enough, there are no other disability benefits we can claim!

    Basic UC is at destitution levels and with no support for our day to day functioning. With our health conditions, even with support it still means that we are unable to look for work so we are not going to be able to cope at all!! We cannot be compared to fit and healthy job seekers as ministers would like to imagine!

    I won't go into the terrifying situation it will put us into with the DWP and the destroying of our lives. We all know how that would work out. 😞

    All of it will hold up in court, they have been going against every equality and human rights law.

    However, the ministers have tried to mislead, withhold information and obstruct MPs, ourselves and the general public throughout, hoping they can get the proposals through, knowing that however unlawful it is, there would be a long, hard struggle to fight it and they hope that everyone would just give up (including us) and let them get on with doing whatever they wanted to do to us 😡

    That is why the main call from MPs is to make sure that all the information about the impact of the cuts is available for them to study before they come to a decision. That will be in October, not June!

  • bton1968
    bton1968 Community Member Posts: 156 Empowering

    births in the UK yesterday 1600 approximately.

    illegal boat crossings yesterday 1200 ….

    this is why starmer is targeting welfare cuts ….

  • JasonRA
    JasonRA Community Member Posts: 315 Championing

    Ex Labour Reform supporters are not going to vote Labour again, Labour's biggest threat comes from the Left and the Lib Dems.

    The PM should push for massive investment in access to work and work well increasing opportunities but ultimately you can't force employers to hire disabled people and many employers don't want to hire disabled people.

    Thing is PIP helps disabled people in work and Labour wants to take that away from them whilst claiming PIP is an unemployment benefit. These lies should come with legal consequences for politicians.

  • Amaya_Ringo
    Amaya_Ringo Community Member Posts: 417 Championing

    I am honestly so fed up with that prevarication. The fact they keep avoiding that PIP is a disability benefit and has nothing to do with numbers in employment (both employed and non employed disabled people claim it).

    They KNOW it. But they also know most of the media don't care and will continue to report on it as such.

  • Amaya_Ringo
    Amaya_Ringo Community Member Posts: 417 Championing
    edited June 2025

    Sorry, my pc had a double post accident. Nothing to see here :)

  • jul1aorways
    jul1aorways Community Member Posts: 397 Pioneering
    edited June 2025
  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    How have the MPs not looked at figures and worked it out themselves though? I read labour have said not as many will be affected due to conditions getting worse hence higher scores. So we are now to rely on becoming more sick and disabled to gain extra points and of course hope we get a truthful assessor on the day .

  • AppleJacks
    AppleJacks Posts: 89 Empowering
    edited June 2025

    The truth is, there's too many claiming for the slightest thing. This is what has triggered the cut backs, you only have to read a few in the forums i/e can I get benefits because I'm a student and I get headaches, could I claim PiP. This where it's gone wrong and they've seen it. But now they're targeting everyone, it was easy to push through WFA through because it wasn't a benefit, but it's backfired on him. So now they've got his back up, he'll come down harder on the genuine ones in society. If you think they're going to lay back and give in with the cuts, well think again. He still hasn't said who will get WFA yet. They made the mistake of saying you can only get it with pension credit and that's turned in to a nightmare for him 😂

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    Hi Catherine,

    There’s a graph from dwp foi regarding the pip 4 points and who gets 4 points currently. It shows that 87% on standard don’t get 4 points plus 13% on enhanced. I think we need to email this breakdown to MPs so they realise it’s not 10% who will lose out. They need the real figures if the vote does go ahead . I can’t remember where I saw that breakdown but I’ll see if can find it tmrw. My fatigue very bad today but I’ll try tmrw and start emailing it to them. Hope you’re well 😀

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    Even if they were already passed in law from before he became PM he could scrap the cuts as he’s planning to do to others . He will be responsible for any deaths as will reeves Kendall and Timms

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    Hi juls,

    I just saw on another site a quote from a newspaper possibly the times regarding the 4 point rule. It said one tweak they’re looking at is anyone who gets a high enough score but not a 4 could still get pip . It said that would mean about 200,00 still eligible. The numbers on enhanced that don’t get the 4 points is 209,00. So I think they started off with the intention of scrapping standard rate but leaving 13% who get 4 points alone . Now suddenly there’s talk of “helping” everyone on enhanced keep pip whether or not they get a 4 points . Seems like an extra step towards scrapping standard rate to me . Though my MEs bad right now so I may not be making any sense 😂. If up to it tmrw I’ll look for that report from foi regarding the pip points and breakdown of who gets the 4 . I’ll send it to some MPs so they know it’s 87% set to lose out , not 10% as they’re being told .

  • alexroda
    alexroda Community Member Posts: 383 Trailblazing

    the head of reform was on sky news today talking about what cuts would they implement.

    No mention of disability cuts at all once again.

    Whichever party supports the proposed disability cuts are done for at the next general election.

    Reform and Tories know that.

    Are Liebour aware of it too?

This discussion has been closed.