Green Paper Related Discussions

1129130132134135147

Comments

  • charlie72
    charlie72 Community Member Posts: 259 Pioneering

    I don't know how they would get round it, Iv'e said before about someone else finding an article on other sites, online media etc about this money bill. U.C and pip were never meant to be money bills but policy bills, so the government can't just decide they are now money bills just because they want them to be. I might be wrong, i'm no legal expert, but ever since I first heard about this weeks ago I can't find any solid evidence it can be done or that labour have said they are planning to do so (which they can't). I seem to post the same response to this every week and somebody else posts, well this is what I found online (not meaning yourself). If people want to worry themselves about it, fine, but again for clarification here is what I found, wether by google, Chatgpt, ringing Scope and CAB, who knows maybe they are all wrong and online media is correct as they are soooo reliable.

    Were UC and PIP introduced via Money Bills?

    No, Universal Credit (introduced by the Welfare Reform Act 2012) and PIP (also under the same Act) were not passed as Money Bills. They were part of wider welfare reform legislation, which included policy changes, eligibility rules, and conditionality frameworks — not just public spending or taxation. Therefore, they went through the full legislative process, including scrutiny and amendments in the House of Lords.

    Can a new reform (e.g., 'Pathways to Work') be passed as a Money Bill?

    Only if:

    • The provisions are entirely about taxation or public expenditure, without policy elements.
    • It does not change eligibility rules, sanctions, conditions, or rights of claimants (which would make it a policy bill).

    If the reforms involve changing how benefits are awarded, adding new conditions, or changing entitlements (like mandatory engagement for LCWRA or PIP claimants), then it's likely a policy billnot eligible to be treated as a Money Bill.

  • YogiBear
    YogiBear Community Member Posts: 410 Pioneering

    I have just read that on Disability News Service Catherine.

  • luvpink
    luvpink Community Member Posts: 4,875 Championing
    edited June 2025

    @secretsquirrel1

    Hi am hanging in by a thread like most of us are but I am trying very hard to distract myself and not let this consume my mind.

    I refuse to let that happen until we hear an official announcement about just exactly how this is going to affect us all and who they regard as having the most severe conditions to still qualify for disability benefits.

    I hope you are reasonably okay but I realise that all of this is taking its toll on you.

    Take care. X

  • charlie72
    charlie72 Community Member Posts: 259 Pioneering

    I just shows how desperste labour are and are panicking, good I'm glad they're bricking it. They can't have it both ways saying these cuts aren't about savining money or cuts, but to get people back into work, a money bill means it won't be about policy, which is what U.C and pip are!! So to make it a money bill they would be admitting these 'reforms' are about saving money and cutting benefits, which the green paper does not stipulate. I don't think for a minute the speaker would allow it, it also slaps democracy right in the face, mp's and lords would go mad, starmer would definately be finished, mp's would resign. It's never been done before in relation to welfare for that exact reason as it bypasses the right for mp's to challenge or discuss it further in parliament, hence it being undemocratic. In a way I hope labour do try this as it will definately be the end of labour and most certainly starmer.

  • johnnyy85
    johnnyy85 Community Member Posts: 266 Empowering

    This is kier starmers corrupt labour would anything they do surprise you ? they wouldn’t surprise me one bit if they put it through as a money bill

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    They know exactly what they’re doing Charlie . Leaving us stewing, absolutely wicked. I think from what I’ve read on other sites this is come from Jeremy’s letter but as you say it doesn’t make sense for it to be a money bill . I could be wrong but if it did pass as a money bill and DPAC took it to court they would have to explain the fact they’ve lied and said it’s about getting people jobs .

  • lincsgranny
    lincsgranny Community Member Posts: 201 Empowering

    This is on X she is a absolute disgrace

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    I’ve had cramps for years since I was diagnosed with fibromyalgia. Specialist said nothing showed in blood tests . My hands are getting really bad now where they cramp even if I hold my phone

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    I’m also trying to relax as I can’t keep stressing out . It’s all so confusing I don’t even know what I’m actually worrying about anymore

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 1,169 Championing
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • johnnyy85
    johnnyy85 Community Member Posts: 266 Empowering
  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    I really don’t know how they have the cheek to face people and journalists don’t confront them . Starmer posing either waspi women, saying uc needs scrapping. They’re all disgusting

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    Surely she should of waited to at least vote against

  • johnnyy85
    johnnyy85 Community Member Posts: 266 Empowering

    It’s unsettling for starmer even before hopefully a few more resign

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing
  • bellatango
    bellatango Community Member Posts: 119 Empowering

    Love John

    image_2025-06-19_211947666.png
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 1,169 Championing
    edited June 2025
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
This discussion has been closed.