Green Paper Related Discussions NEW

Options
1679111221

Comments

  • Topcat71
    Topcat71 Online Community Member Posts: 161 Empowering

    To save his own job the prime Minister will not side with badenoch. I would like a detailed debate about the proposal that involves everyone. This is what is stressing me out it just feels so so rushed. Why?

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,821 Championing

    I just emailed her saying that . How disgusting playing politics with people’s lives

  • Ross1975
    Ross1975 Online Community Member Posts: 206 Empowering

    Even though the Tories aren't in power anymore they're still managing to torture us again. :(

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,821 Championing

    the last two are impossible as there aren’t the jobs anyway

  • waylander9602
    waylander9602 Online Community Member Posts: 40 Contributor
  • waylander9602
    waylander9602 Online Community Member Posts: 40 Contributor

    He will be brutal in the autumn budget to keep tories happy

  • Jamk85
    Jamk85 Online Community Member Posts: 41 Empowering

    But this comes at a cost

    ''The prospect of the bill passing on Conservative votes would outrage Labour MPs.''

    Would not end well with starmer.

  • lincsgranny
    lincsgranny Online Community Member Posts: 191 Empowering
  • Topcat71
    Topcat71 Online Community Member Posts: 161 Empowering

    "She was born British, as Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke, in a Wimbledon hospital in January 1980, before her parents took her home to Nigeria. Badenoch was among the last to benefit from the birthright citizenship rules which her heroine, Margaret Thatcher, would soon abolish in the 1981 British Nationality Act. She has compared her British passport to the golden ticket that let Charlie Bucket into Willy Wonka’s chocolate factory."

    I never known much about her but she says some terrible things about disability and mental health in the past. One day if she ever experience pain and difficulties in daily living perhaps although she never need benefits herself she will understand how wrong she been.

  • Amaya_Ringo
    Amaya_Ringo Online Community Member Posts: 348 Championing

    I actually think Badenoch's statement is pretty much what you can expect from a Tory statement. It's a way to keep with the principles they apparently believe in (which is why I've kept saying that the Tories would not be a better option), but also giving them an out to vote against the bill if it suits them without losing their core support. If they now vote against the bill, Badenoch can say that it was because Starmer refused to meet their criteria and they are not for negotiation on these points. In short, it saves face.

    It's a brutal statement because it puts Starmer in an impossible position. He already has this much rebellion with the cuts at the level they already are. If he were to curry Tory favour to pass this bill by committing to harsher cuts, it would be outright war and I think the Tories know it. It could 100% lead to a vote of no confidence, which is probably their real aim.

    Until we know where we stand with the amendment/the bill, we don't know what will happen. There is undoubtedly going to be some kind of benefit reform, whether this bill or a revised one down the line. This vote is all about making it clear where the red lines are for those making the decisions.

  • YogiBear
    YogiBear Online Community Member Posts: 304 Empowering

    Having said that if Starmer takes the Conservatives help how will the Labour Party backbenchers react?? Kemi is boxing him in so to speak. Whatever Starmer decides it's not going to be good for him.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,821 Championing

    Can the amendment go ahead and wreck the bill without kemi ?

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,821 Championing
  • Zipz
    Zipz Online Community Member Posts: 2,254 Trailblazing

    The entire welfare issue has been rushed. Labour had the option to look past a first term and introduce sound, compassionate policies that would ensure better healthcare that might enable many to return to work. Money could have been saved by ensuring those who will never work are not reassessed. They could have considered taxing PIP. But no! Despite a huge majority they've tried to fight off Reform.

    I cannot see Starmer agreeing to the Tory demands. They might as well form a coalition against Reform.

    What's next?

    The real Labour MPs need Tory votes to pass the ammendment to halt the Bill next Tuesday unless MPs are shattered by KS and KB flirting that even more support it. I doubt this will happen. So there'll be a vote at the end of the Second Reading. I think the Bill will pass to its next stage.

    It's devastating. All in 24 hours.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,821 Championing
  • johnnyy85
    johnnyy85 Online Community Member Posts: 252 Empowering

    Labour have responded to badenock


    A Labour spokesperson said: "We're fixing the abysmal mess the Tories left behind, and MPs can either vote to keep a broken, failed welfare system that writes people off, or they can vote to start fixing it.

    "Next week's Bill is a test for the Leader of the Opposition as to whether her party has learned anything at all by being roundly rejected by Britain"

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,821 Championing

    Some of them said,apparently, they didn’t want to vote and walk the same corridor’s as reform and now Starmer could possibly form a kind of coalition with Tory’s

  • mac99
    mac99 Online Community Member Posts: 33 Contributor

    how would labour voters react?it could cause labour voters to abandon the party in they're droves if he made a deal with theb tories as it would prove labour and tories are the same.

  • Stellar
    Stellar Online Community Member Posts: 295 Pioneering

    HMG, to use your words "treating you as adults," while also taking away the support you need to thrive, (such as these benefit cuts, adult social care, inaccessible and overpriced public transport, destruction of the NHS, toothless equalities law) is an oxymoron.

    "My life my choice" cannot truly apply under these circumstances. And sadly, that's what supporters of assisted dying in a capitalist system like yourself refuse to accept.