Scope's reply to the governments planned concessions to the green paper.

1235756

Comments

  • chiarieds
    chiarieds Online Community Member Posts: 17,155 Championing

    Hi @secretsquirrel1 - that part about making it easier for 'people with multiple impairments' could just be the Guardian's impression/choice of words. I don't mean that in a negative way, as I'd guess many of us have more than one disorder, but I don't think we've heard those words in relation to these supposed 'concessions' from the Gov't. Don't lose any hope over this either, as we have many charities supporting us over these dubious reforms.

    The Gov't are wanting to change the words about scc in their Bill, which hopefully won't get through, from a LCWRA descriptor applies 'the majority of the time,' to it applies 'constantly.' This obviously needs to be addressed, as we've discussed before.

    Please don't worry, the question would be how would the DWP disprove that, even if your condition fluctuates, you don't have that condition all of the time, so you therefore 'fit' the descriptor? It's just a very poor use of words, & these have to be very clear to change legislation.

    I've said that I'll question this use of the word 'constantly' when I email my response to the Gov't, & I promise I will - that's my homework for the weekend! 😊

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 2,042 Championing

    Thank you ,

    Yes I thought maybe it was the guardians choice of words , it just seemed a bit random as I’ve never seen anything mentioned of it before so wondered where they got that idea from. It seemed to fit in with claimants who get 2s from several descriptors.

  • chiarieds
    chiarieds Online Community Member Posts: 17,155 Championing

    You raise a point many of us are considering @emc123 - it reads like current claimants will not be subjected to the proposed PIP 4 point rule, but there's nothing to say this will carry on 'indefinitely.'

    This 'possibly' because after the Gov't hopes this Bill is passed, changes to the PIP assessment & the descriptors used have already been proposed in their Green Paper. So, we can't know for sure how this will pan out.

    As you say, with some uncertainties like this, how can a MP make an informed decision?

  • geckobat
    geckobat Online Community Member Posts: 178 Empowering
    edited June 27

    Have they explained what will happen to those only on LCWRA and the like after 2028/29? No good promising protections that will be gone in a few years.

    Not that any of this is good long term anyway.

  • Passerby
    Passerby Online Community Member Posts: 857 Championing

    Any existing claimant can also become a new claimant. All this takes is to lose your current award and reapply for it a year later and you become a new claimant, Bang!

  • geckobat
    geckobat Online Community Member Posts: 178 Empowering
  • emc123
    emc123 Online Community Member Posts: 134 Empowering
    edited June 28

    Yes. Mainly at risk are those trying for C.O.C , (Someone on Enhanced x2 for eg isn't likely to initiate one of these Unplanned Reviews).

    A Planned Review for these people especially a NO Change AR1 would be Much harder to attack. (If it Is stopped, there's Tribunal, and Not a New Claim….they're gonna be Inundated).

    What we Need Confidence in is a Planned Review initiated by DWP the reassessment would be under Current Rules, as Kendall Said 'Stay in the Current System".

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 1,009 Championing

    I have learnt to treat government polices as a political promise and nothing more, its not a contract, the EPG as an example only survived in its original form for an extremely short time. It could be as soon as the time period you quoted as there is currently a review for the PIP descriptors a change which is coming in later after the 4 point change, and the wording from Kendall seems to specifically state the 2026 changes. There is a reliance on ignorance to get away with as much as they can.

  • geckobat
    geckobat Online Community Member Posts: 178 Empowering
  • Chris75_
    Chris75_ Online Community Member Posts: 3,131 Championing
    edited June 28

    @duc749 Vouchers? My Foot!

  • onlymeagain
    onlymeagain Online Community Member Posts: 233 Empowering

    Whilst it appears many of us would be okay if the current rules would still apply to us on renewal, we need to keep on fighting for those waiting to transfer to PIP or who may apply for it at a later date.
    I don't want there to be any changes, but more than that, I don't want there to be a two tier unfair system.

  • Passerby
    Passerby Online Community Member Posts: 857 Championing

    Guess what! I've just completed claiming the UC due to having received the migration invitation letter. It took me about an hour to complete it. It's not much different from classical paper based forms people used to fill in when apply for Income Support or Jobseeker's Allowance, etc. The only difference is that this time it's online.

    I could submit it right now, but I need to speak with my housing association first, as the form asks not just for your total monthly or weekly rent, but the basic rent and the eligible service charge separately, and I only have a copy of my rent account statement of July 2024, which is not good, as my rent increased last Nov. as it does every year.

    I think the ID verification takes place after the submission of the claim. I might be wrong.

    I don't know why some people have claimed that they were asked to provide fit notes, when the form itself says: "Since you've told us that you're on ESA, you don't need to provide fit notes."

    All that took me time was coming up with a username that hasn't been used by someone else. I finally used the French name of my former dog and voilà.

    So, you've nothing to worry about this.

  • Wibbles
    Wibbles Online Community Member Posts: 2,773 Championing

    What is the governments definition of a NEW CLAIMANT ?

    ie) When do they plan the cut off date to be ?

  • sarah_lea12
    sarah_lea12 Online Community Member Posts: 409 Empowering

    why are you still claiming then if you don't need the money ? , maybe you could collect Tesco points instead .

  • mrsBB
    mrsBB Online Community Member Posts: 302 Empowering

    Just a quick question, hopefully someone will answer who understands what I am getting at because I am really concerned that folk are celebrating this as a win when I cant do that because something is niggling me, I'm finding it difficult to move past this niggle. Is it just me, it could be, I am struggling a lot with the effects of the new meds I am on and they are not related to mental health but are really messing my thought processes up, been told they can do that, they are not nice meds at all but being tried in an effort to get me stable and out of a two year flare up of one of my main debilitating conditions. Sorry, that was long winded phew 😮

    This is my ''niggle'', I could swear when the green paper first came out I read, that changes to the actual assessment criteria etc would be left to a later date ? Now this could just be me, but maybe the Gov have given these concessions now while sneakily knowing that at that later date ( which I believe will be sooner rather than later ) they will just make the criteria even higher to reach and much more difficult to attain for the vast majority of claimants. This would help them to claw back the money they are going lose out on now plus some ! I cant help but think this is all a ploy to calm the rebellion and the disabled. We know this is all about money, I just feel its bonkers to think we have ''won'' I just know there will be private discussions going on behind closed doors right now, where those in power will be saying, well yeah we have to do this now but we will be in a great position ''later'' with the assessment criteria to get this money back and do what we wanted to do in the first place. There you go 🤣my niggle that will not go away and my reason to think we have not won a darn thing.

  • Wibbles
    Wibbles Online Community Member Posts: 2,773 Championing
    edited June 28

    What about claimants who use the funds for major expenses - like building works ?

    I used my PIP to pay for a vital house wet room extension - which used up my future PIP for many years - how would I have paid for that using vouchers ?

    Also if DWP had to reassess every single claimant every 3 years - they would never meet the demands of assessing new claimants - the workload would be immense.

  • Meredithshep
    Meredithshep Online Community Member Posts: 95 Empowering

    I did say probably, didn't state it was fact. Might be an idea though instead of having two tier for pensioners on PIP and DLA when others get AA. PIP is an in work benefit so maybe it would be fairer to have all pension age people claim AA rather than make new rules for new claimants. Bring everyone onto a level playing field so to speak. Yes I would be prepared to change when I reach retirement age to make things fair to all. My dad is 5 years into parkinsons, his mobility and balance is terrible and he is 6 years into dementia so can't go out alone but manages with AA.

  • Zipz
    Zipz Online Community Member Posts: 3,230 Championing

    Hello everybody. I think this is the end of my road. I cannot take living for however many more years with hte constant threat of changes to the wefaare system. My disability is advanced. No family no friends. Just daily pain. So I'm saying a big thankyou and goodbye. Bless you all. Zipz xx

  • happyman
    happyman Online Community Member Posts: 89 Contributor

    scope say don't start another thread on this but then they don't answer the question on their thread. I would like an answer instead of saying don't start a new thread as that remark is very unhelpful.

    I want to know if the u turn is just a play on words. So, it says people on pip will now be protected but what does that mean. If you have someone on pip and they have a review after the changes are brought in, are they affected by the changes. not many people have a long award. most people have awards that last three years or five years.

    So, once again scope. I ask you the same question. When someone comes up for review after being on pip do they come under the new rules. So if they don't get four points do they lose their pip.

    Would appreciate an answer because a lot of questions people are asking are being ignored and a lot of people are worried

This discussion has been closed.