The Green Paper Discussion (the document link is here too!)

1747577798089

Comments

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 8,634 Championing
  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 8,634 Championing

    I cant even look at starmer he has done noting for UK he's putting final nail

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 8,634 Championing

    We won't lose our benefits it will all be watered down

  • Albus_Scope
    Albus_Scope Posts: 11,423 Scope Online Community Coordinator
  • Bigboblee50
    Bigboblee50 Online Community Member Posts: 41 Contributor

    Thank you I am trying to remind myself they are just proposals at present a long way to go

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 1,009 Championing
    edited March 22

    The problem is the 4 point rule is the whole point of it, its providing the majority of the cuts. If they get rid of it, they may as well drop the entire green paper. The bargaining chip which was probably deliberate was the PIP freeze and LCWRA cut backs.
    We also shouldnt sit back and assume it will be watered down, we need to resist this until the end really. Remember this has cross party support, there is no opposition of note to it in the commons. I think Labour are all in on this, and would even carry on with 20-30 mps going independent.
    If it does get dropped I wouldnt be surprised if Reeve resigned over it. She is absolutely obsessed with austerity.

  • ased444
    ased444 Online Community Member Posts: 166 Connected

    Hi

    Can anyone please tell me as recent kendal anouncement has got everyone headache i just wanted to know i have my wife in lcwra and no end date and i need to know does she needs reasessment for pip or will be replaced with new uc health element without asessment on pip and if she gets to new uc health element without assessment does she have to look for work on uc health element or will she be treated as have no reassesment needed? Thanks

  • ased444
    ased444 Online Community Member Posts: 166 Connected
  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 1,009 Championing
    edited March 22

    If I have one of these telephone Uc reviews which seems is inevitable, and they try to challenge my spending, I wont be taking it lying down.

    Deprivation of capital is deliberately getting rid of money to increase benefit entitlement, its not spending money on things the DWP dont like, and I will be happy to take it to tribunal if they try to bully me over it. Taking £50 out of an account isnt really going to change entitlement, so it would be a walk over.

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 1,170 Championing
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • charlie72
    charlie72 Online Community Member Posts: 259 Pioneering
    edited March 22

    Keir Starmer has to make his mind up if he is either a saviour or an oppressor, but in my view he's certainly no saviour as he would like us all to beleive. I have written to various media outlets about these cuts, including The Guardian, The Mirror, The Times, also emailed Ellen Clifford asking her about potential legal actions.

    Iv'e emailed my local MP,and also Jeremy Corbyn, John Mcdonnell about these cuts to our benefits, I used Chatgpt to format each letter and email as it's free to use then just copied it into my emails etc. Apparently 2 million of us could be affected by these cuts, but in my view if we all refused to accept them, even if that meant threats of sanctions or losing benefits, how could they make us all destitute and homeless? There would be such a massive backlash from mp's and the media, giving this abhorrent government unwanted negative press.

    If we just sit here waiting for these changes to happen, and to allow this onslaught to our right to a decent way of living, they will carry on with future cuts, and so will other future governments, seeing us as an easy target to bully and balance the fiscal books. I know many of us have written to our mp's etc, but we mustn't give in and need to carry on emailing the media, mp's and others to listen to our opposition to these cuts.

    If anyone would like to email Ellen Clifford to ask her to oppose these cuts with legal challenges, or just to offer her your support, Iv'e included her email link below. Take care all x

    ellenclifford277@gmail.com

  • Stellar
    Stellar Online Community Member Posts: 366 Pioneering

    Keir Starmer made his mind up that's an oppressor long before he become PM. It goes right the way back to his time as Director of Public Prosecutions, alongside working to destroy the Labour left during the Corbyn era, right the through to lying to become Labour leader in 2020.

    Also don't use ChatGPT to write your letters. Not only do AI programs contributing to the climate crisis with every prompt, but placeholder/AI/templates will get filtered out as spam.

    Also writing to MPs is not enough. It never will be. People who can must take to the streets.

  • Mysteriouskitten
    Mysteriouskitten Online Community Member Posts: 40 Empowering

    Ellen Clifford is already on it.

    https://youtu.be/WVk7NljMM1w?si=yQEy2eoX8r-hitn5

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 8,634 Championing

    Oh yes I email him later got so many cases open if they say no more I do more going do another consultation x

  • YogiBear
    YogiBear Online Community Member Posts: 411 Pioneering

    Did anyone watch The Last Leg on Channel 4 last night? The presenters didn't hold back regarding the Government and the their proposals. ☺️

  • JasonRA
    JasonRA Online Community Member Posts: 310 Championing

    Food for thought but it's an opinion piece I saw on MSN, case and point there are people on our side, people with legal knowledge. I knew that the Equalities Act 2010 plays a role.

    "The welfare reform plans announced by Liz Kendall have left benefit claimants and applicants reeling with what it could potentially mean for their pockets. But the planned changes could drastically shift the rights of countless Brits.

    Daniel McAfee, Head of Legal Operations at Lawhive, highlighted that the tightened eligibility for Personal Independence Payments will be the front line of this “legal battleground”. And that’s just to prove the new criteria itself is lawful.

    The lawyer advised people facing the brunt of these changes: “When the time comes, any individuals looking to make a claim in light of the DWP changes should keep meticulous records of all communications, assessments, and financial impacts. The key here is to be proactive and challenge any inconsistencies or unfair treatment from the outset."

    He explained: “There could be grounds for challenge if it can be proved that the new criteria fail to adequately reflect the complex and fluctuating nature of many disabilities, especially mental health conditions. Think about the challenges in quantifying mental health.

    “How do you objectively measure 'anxiety' or 'depression' in a way that aligns with rigid criteria? That's where the legal battleground will be.”

    The expert noted people’s rights under the Equality Act 2010 will come into play here. This act makes discrimination against disabled people illegal and he warned even if the new criteria seems neutral “there could be arguments for indirect discrimination” which is unlawful under the act and could lead to legal action.

    He warned: “This is where the 'can versus can't work' rhetoric falls apart. The legal protections here hinge on the government's duty of care and its obligations under the Equality Act and human rights law.

    “There needs to be clear exemptions and protections for those with the most severe disabilities. Any benefit reductions must be proportionate and justified. Otherwise, it could be argued that any reduction that results in a failure to meet basic needs is unlawful.”

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 8,634 Championing

    Send them the Tellybubbies tune and change the names but I can't say what I'd change them to on here

  • Bigboblee50
    Bigboblee50 Online Community Member Posts: 41 Contributor

    This is the big question,the tories proposed this exact same proposal whilst true it hit harder with definite freeze of pip it's exact same proposal,in the documents only it states as LCWRA becomes Universal Credit Health all existing claimants would be migrated over automatically but as such and so not entering via new system modelled upon the pip assessment they would be therefore required to engage more with jobcentre plus in return for financial support. The question here is are Labour copying that the point is are people assuming the scrapping of WCA the mention of pips remaining being used by new claimants means existing LCWRA we all declared suddenly fit for work? These are the questions campaigners seeking to answer. In short nobody yet knows frankly. I am as scared as you but as I was told try try stay calm these are just proposals right now they may be altered watered down or totally changed all that won't is scrapping WCA

This discussion has been closed.