Green Paper Discussion (from 24th March, 2025)

1242527293046

Comments

  • sarah_lea12
    sarah_lea12 Community Member Posts: 442 Empowering

    I really don't think the proposals will go through, it is bad for the economy , even people on benefits pay tax vat and contribute towards the economy .

    They are talking about making half of the country destitute , it will make the already UK recession a depression .

    We should be speaking positive because if you look at the proposals they just cannot work.

    How many households could adapt and survive having £1000 a month taken from their benefit or wage?

    Who will rehouse these people when they get evicted for none payment of rent /mortgage ?

    Where are these jobs coming from when disabled people have no chance of getting taken on by an employee , why would they want disabled people on their workforce who will want time off for sick days , hospital and doctors appointments ?

    It's not going to work , its a dream labour have and in the past similar proposals were rejected .

    Please speak positive , lift your vibration , they hate it .

  • sarah_lea12
    sarah_lea12 Community Member Posts: 442 Empowering

    I think this is the most unpopular piece of legislation for decades and will be fought tooth and nail .Also all the Labour MP's voting will know if they vote in favour of this , it will be the end of their career .

  • Stellar
    Stellar Community Member Posts: 486 Pioneering

    This is awesome news. The DWP is such a god awful institution, it's no wonder they cant recruit work coaches. Plus like most jobs, the pay is too low to justify it. Even if the Tories force these reforms through, they're doomed to fail.

    It's almost as if not trusting benefit claimants to be honest about their situation (and not giving a **** if they're doing benefit fraud so long as they aren't hurting anyone else) creates more problems than it solves. It's neoliberalism, capitalism and eugenics doing what they do best.

  • jul1aorways
    jul1aorways Community Member Posts: 394 Pioneering

    @Catherine21

    You're very welcome, I just wish it wasn't so complicated!! 😊

  • Maggie37
    Maggie37 Community Member Posts: 79 Empowering

    The truly awful part is that Reeves and Kendall clearly know about the chronic staff shortages at DWP/ Job Centres. They’ve threatened and terrified disabled people whilst knowing there just isn’t the staff available to implement these reforms. It’s not just a handful of job centres too… it’s HALF of them! Talk about honest ‘consultation’… this has been a non starter from the beginning.

  • Girl_No1
    Girl_No1 Community Member Posts: 413 Trailblazing

    @SadOldPanda

    I might be interested in your offer. What colour/s are the free bmws?🧐

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 288 Empowering
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • AppleJacks
    AppleJacks Posts: 89 Empowering

    You are mistaken, I never mentioned anything about getting a military pension!

  • AppleJacks
    AppleJacks Posts: 89 Empowering

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgm87z0dv3mo

    This was on the news this morning. So I don't really know how they will implement people finding jobs.

  • Martinp
    Martinp Community Member Posts: 248 Empowering

    I don’t think it’s ever been about finding us jobs, it’s just to make us suffer. They need a group of people to demonise and humiliate to make the rest of the country feel good.

  • Wibbles
    Wibbles Community Member Posts: 3,550 Championing

    Please could you ensure that I get a Merc instead ?

    BMW's are two a penny - it seems that everyone has at least 2 ever since you offered them.

  • SadOldPanda
    SadOldPanda Community Member Posts: 37 Empowering

    lol its either a bmw or fit for work! With 24 hour job search and an electric shock collar that gets you every time you aren’t sufficiently grateful for the pennies they give you!


    (Wow I really could work at the job Center, I’ve got the evil streak!)

  • Wibbles
    Wibbles Community Member Posts: 3,550 Championing
    edited March 2025

    According to https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly2gkepel4o

    In her address to MPs, Reeves said "it can't be right" to "write off" an entire generation who are out of work and improperly using Pips.

    How are we supposed to use PIP ?

    I never realised that there could even be an improper way to spend my benefits ……..I use mine for surviving.

    Here we go again with the "out of work" - sorry Reeves but you should return to the classroom and try to understand PIP is NOT an out of work benefit…..

  • silmarillion
    silmarillion Community Member Posts: 39 Empowering

    I agree…where are they going to find a million disabled friendly jobs? Perhaps we should all go and join the House of Commons as MPs…..or House of Lords? Honestly there’s a huge gap between the number of perceived jobs and actual jobs for disabled people. I’ve applied for hundreds of jobs, as soon as they find out you need more than just tiny basic adaptations….you don’t even get an interview….even the DWP refused to give me a job interview!

    Neatly sliding disabled people into a life of poverty and hardship will not motivate employers to employ them…..it will just frustrate and have a very detrimental effect upon us. It’s a cost cutting farce!

  • gamer1
    gamer1 Community Member Posts: 81 Empowering
    edited March 2025

    Let's say that they are getting the 6bn from reducing LCWRA from £97 to £47.

    Then they will reduce the number of people on PIP and LCWRA by making assessment harder many people will lose both. Then they are stopping LCWRA in line with inflation rates. Then they are stopping claims for under 21 year olds, and people receiving carers and DLA etc will also lose entitlement. Even with the uprate to universal credit benefit to £106 (which they reduced £1, saving them a further £500 million in the statement) it will be a welfare reform of well over £10 billion in my guess. Not to mention the tactic they use to stop people benefits once you are on standard jobseekers allowance or any other way they stop it. The statement by them does not make sense they are lying about it.

This discussion has been closed.