Green Paper Related Discussions

16667697172113

Comments

  • charlie72
    charlie72 Online Community Member Posts: 218 Pioneering

    That's great, thanks!! 😂 She'll probably just scowl at it then think up more evil plans for us, vindictive old boiler that she is.

  • Passerby
    Passerby Posts: 444 Trailblazing

    "Personally I don’t think it should matter what condition you have , if it stops you working so you can have a decent standard of living you should get pip."

    Co-signed, even though I'm not currently claiming PIP.

  • charlie72
    charlie72 Online Community Member Posts: 218 Pioneering

    I know, non of it makes sense, it's just Liz's way of looking strong and powerful, when in fact she's weak and powerless and will be looking for a job soon. Iv'e heard she will soon be available for halloween parties (no witches costume needed), and stand in folks gardens scaring kids off, especially the sick & disabled ones apparently.

  • jul1aorways
    jul1aorways Online Community Member Posts: 397 Pioneering

    Sadly, fighting is soul destroying. It comes with the package unfortunately. 📦🤦However this is so well worth fighting for and who can say what can be achieved. We can't know what that is unless we fight to make the opportunity for it to happen though! 😊

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,381 Championing
    edited May 26

    💯 correct . I said the same thing . What they mean is we will get TP as we do transferring from sea legacy to uc lcwra. You now get an extra esa payment so you now wait 3 weeks for uc instead of 5. But if we lose pip /lcwra they’ll give us a last payment while we wait for uc basic to start . But what happens legally if like me you physically can’t work and they say you have to sign a declaration that you’ll engage . Will we be committing an offence by signing then refusing to job search due to being unable to ?
    As for what we spend pip on you’re right it should be for us to live a normal life as possible. Why should we go without just because we can’t work . Are we second class citizens who don’t deserve to use our money as we need to just because we are disabled?

  • jul1aorways
    jul1aorways Online Community Member Posts: 397 Pioneering

    I didn't intend to offend anyone, by that post but I've realised that it came from my own experience of school where I was bullied by one teacher in the infants school and another in junior school, both of them doing so on many occasions. 

    My Mum tried to get something done about it but it continued, despite repeated visits to the headmistress. 

    I haven't got any experience of having my own children or grandchildren going through school as I decided not to have them, so I can't go by that either. 

    I just wish you could have asked why I'd made those comments instead of launching into an uncalled for tirade calling me disgusting. 

    Believe me, it's bought back the memories of those teachers treating me as if I was disgusting. They made me feel as though I was defective and the other children seemed to be able to do no wrong, for some reason. 

    I'm sure you will think that I'm exaggerating to get some sympathy. I'm not, I'm just making a statement. 

    I wanted to say all this to point out that we are all different people with different life experiences and what you read from somebody like me, may not fit your view of the world. It doesn't mean that it isn't a valid experience though. 

    I've no doubt that most teachers are really struggling today as they weren't in those days. I'm sure also that most teachers go into the job for all the right reasons. However, teachers are still human beings and not every child will be fortunate enough to have a good teacher. 

    For the record, I had no other bullying teachers and in fact had one who was really helped me in secondary school. 

    However, that didn't really didn't help me much with my earlier experiences unfortunately. After those two teachers bullied me, a few children from those classes started to do the same and it went on from there. 

    By secondary school, the bullying was completely out of control and the headmistress there would do nothing about it either. 

    Please will you just bear in mind that we are all disabled on this community and some people will have had very difficult lives.

    That often helps to cause disability too so quite a few of us will be in that position. In the future, would you consider just asking that person to explain themselves and see what their story is first? You could message them privately to do that as well. 

    We are all under a great deal of pressure from a government who takes sadistic pleasure in bullying us, by threatening to take everything we have off us. There is also the problem of other people bullying us because we are disabled. 

    It doesn't make for trusting people who see others or the world in a very positive way. 

    I will think twice about my opinions on teachers but you should consider thinking again about why someone might make the comments they do.

    All they might be is completely unintended and just reflects that person's view of the world, whether they know it or not. I personally have not consciously thought of those teachers for many years. My subconscious must have remembered though. Please do think very carefully before you go accusing someone of something on this community as they may not even know they were doing it. That was me.

  • Zipz
    Zipz Online Community Member Posts: 2,102 Trailblazing

    From "The I":

    Up to 170 Labour rebels in stand off with Starmer over PIP benefits cuts

    Some rebels believe the strength of the opposition to the benefits cuts is making the prospect of a u-turn inevitable

    fd89131176207414194cd474a435bc63-245229272_e0cb1c.jpg

    Disabled people protest outside Downing Street against cuts to welfare benefits (Photo: Wiktor Szymanowicz/Future Publishing via Getty Images)

    placeholder

    Richard Vaughan, Chloe Chaplain

     

    26th May 2025 5:19 PM

    Listen

    Ministers are at a standoff with Labour MPs over benefit reforms, with rebel ringleaders warning that tweaks to any welfare changes will not be enough to ward off a significant rebellion. 

    Backbenchers are demanding major changes to the proposals first put forward by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall in March under the welfare green paper, including a rethink on the eligibility of personal independent payments (PIP) and benefits paid to carers.

    But The i Paper understands the Government is not close to offering concessions to see off a major rebellion, highlighting Kendall’s speech last week in which she again pressed the urgent need for reform on welfare. 

    The refusal to give ground sets up the potential for a serious revolt when MPs will be expected to vote through changes to PIP next month. Some believe a u-turn of sorts is now inevitable.

    Around 170 MPs are understood to be preparing to rebel by either voting against the Government on changes to the eligibility for PIP payments, or abstaining on the vote, serving up the prospect of a highly damaging defeat for Sir Keir Starmer.

    The Prime Minister last week signalled that the Government will u-turn on its decision to stop winter fuel payments for all but the poorest pensioners, while there is an expectation that ministers could scrap or water down the two child benefit cap.

    But Labour MPs are demanding Downing Street go further and row back on some of the more contentious changes to the welfare system.

    A senior Labour rebel told The i Paper on Monday: “We have pushed for a change in how we do welfare reform across the piece. On PIP we have called for a restoration of the future jobs fund but for disabled people.”

    The MP added that there would be a particular push to get changes to plans to limit the carers’ allowance. “People are very concerned [about the carers’ allowance].

    “The big thing everyone is asking for at present is the impact assessments as we can’t do any of this blind.”

    A Red Wall MP suggested a u-turn of sorts was inevitable from the Government, adding: “It feels to me like the government is going to have to react in some way to kind of mitigate the amount of rebels.”

    But another rebel said tweaking the carers allowance or small change to policies would not be enough to win over MPs who are opposed to the changes.

    “The Government’s welfare reforms face opposition not just because of individual changes, but down to the fact they’re targeting the most vulnerable,” the MP said. “Changing one or two won’t silence or change the minds of the 150 MPs that have voiced their opposition [in letters to the chief whip and PM].”

    The comments were echoed by another backbencher, who said: “We are pushing back on carer’s allowance, but to safeguard this will not be enough.”

    They added: “It would make sense for the government to do some more comprehensive work on disabled people’s support by the autumn and pause for now.”

    While ministers have refused to back down, insiders said that engagement between the Government and rebels was ongoing and was more than just lipservice.

    Despite this, another rebel, Peter Lamb the Labour MP for Crawley, went public with his opposition to the proposals and said he would be voting against the welfare reforms.

    He told BBC Radio 4’s Westminster Hour he would be “voting against anything which is going to restrict access to PIP further than it’s currently restricted”.

    Many Labour MPs across different wings of the party are “deeply uncomfortable” with what ministers are planning, he added.

  • bton1968
    bton1968 Online Community Member Posts: 113 Empowering

    Upto 170 mps ready to vote against the cuts .…

    Is this all parties or just Labour ?

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,381 Championing

    I’m so sorry you had to go through that Jul . The people that are supposed to protect unfortunately sometimes don’t yet are beyond reproach. There are some Drs , nurses , vets etc that don’t have empathy and it does make you wonder why they’re in that profession. I had a similar though not as bad situation as yours with my child’s teacher many years ago . Due to neurodivergence it was a good excuse for one teacher to leave my child’s shut in a side classroom by himself. Fortunately I was informed by a TA . And these things aren’t just because of over worked teachers . I heard recently of a support teacher with less than 6 pupils who left a child distressed and just said oh do what you want then. No one has the right to make you feel your bad experiences don’t count .

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,381 Championing

    I think Labour but I read a while ago the Tory’s are voting against though I can’t confirm that’s true

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,381 Championing

    I didn’t know they were limiting carers or is that a result of the loss of pip ? I couldn’t read the article from I newspaper as link didn’t work but it sounds positive thank you 🙏

  • JasonRA
    JasonRA Online Community Member Posts: 232 Trailblazing

    I do believe that benefit reform is needed but completely not in the way Labour, the Tories or the Reform Party want it to be.

    That any PIP benefit or PIP-Esc benefit should have nothing to do with Universal Credit.

    3 tiers dealing with severity or 6 tiers, 3 tiers for physical disabilities/incapacities and 3 tiers for Mental disabilities/incapacities.

    Having medically trained assessors assessing, having psychiatry assessing, having evidence, having input from your GP then re-assessments would be based on permanent vs recoverable disabilities/incapacities.

    Universal Credit would remain the same, as in Fit for work, LCW and LCWRA but anyone in the category of LCWRA if they're willing without coercion could associate with access to work or "Work well" or other voluntary based training with no fear or pressure to do anything if you don't want to.

    If you're disabled or incapacitated to the point you can't work, you can't work, nothing, no man in the moon, no magician, no wicked witch of Leicester can change that.

    Britain should follow the Scandinavian approach to the welfare state, fair and compassionate but proportionate but that would require a complete reset as to how disabled people are viewed in Britain.

  • johnnyy85
    johnnyy85 Online Community Member Posts: 143 Empowering
    edited May 26

    I think if they vote in our favour either way they vote if they vote against it’s more votes for us 👍 and if they vote for it Starmer will look more of a Tory and with diehard labour supporters that will not go down well when he need the Tory vote 👍

  • Zipz
    Zipz Online Community Member Posts: 2,102 Trailblazing

    CA will be reduced as a direct result of people losing PIP. I dont think CA itself is a target. Care companies will also be hit as will all the little local businesses PIP claimants depend on.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,381 Championing

    I think the hit to the economy alone will be catastrophic. Local shops etc . The cost of training and employing extra tribunal staff . The system was broken after pip but it will be nothing compared to this . Even MR will bring the dwp to a halt as they can’t cope now . Plus what happens legally when people like myself physically can’t work. I’ll be sanctioned constantly yet by law we are entitled to food and shelter

  • charlie72
    charlie72 Online Community Member Posts: 218 Pioneering

    Yes, you are right, we have a right to food/shelter, especially if your disabled.

    Legal Protections for Disabled People

    • The Equality Act 2010 protects you from discrimination based on disability. Public bodies (like councils and the DWP) have a legal duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled people.
    • If you're sanctioned or benefits are cut in a way that puts your health or safety at risk, this could potentially be a breach of your human rights, and you may be able to challenge it legally (e.g., under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights – protection from inhuman or degrading treatment).
  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,381 Championing

    And guess who used that right to beat blairs government in court over benefits for asylum seekers? He won on the fact everyone has the right to food and shelter . Yet suddenly he doesn’t believe in benefits. One day maybe he’ll write his memoirs and tell us his real views.

  • jul1aorways
    jul1aorways Online Community Member Posts: 397 Pioneering

    Thank you so much for your kind, supportive words Squirrel. 😊 You've made me feel much better.

    I'm sorry to hear that your child was treated like that.😔

    It's true that a minority of controlling, manipulative people get into the caring or teaching professions because it gives them access to vulnerable people and children and then they find a way to covertly abuse them.

    I didn't know that my subconscious was working on me in the original post but the member who accused me of a disgusting attitude towards teachers didn't need to be that harsh.

    I keep feeling that my post was my fault though and I should have realised what I was doing. Honestly, I had no idea at all and I certainly didn't mean to sound so judgemental.

    Anyway, I'll have a night's sleep and I will probably feel better about this in the morning.

    Jul xx

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,381 Championing

    There are unsympathetic people in all jobs jul we just don’t expect it in the caring professions . Look at the pip assessors , some are truly awful yet are nurses etc . Your post was in no way offensive so don’t blame yourself, you feelings are valid . Try and have a lovely sleep x