Green Paper Related Discussions

16970727475148

Comments

  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 5,660 Championing
    edited May 2025

    Jason They want to take the power GP's have of giving fit notes away also.

    (from A guide for General Practitioners and other doctors February 2010)

    "Why change? Improving your patients’ health through work. Evidence shows that work has therapeutic value and is generally good for physical and mental health.

    With the introduction of the new Statement the Forms Med 3 and Med 5 have been streamlined into one form. Also, because of the recent introduction of Employment and Support Allowance (ESA), you no longer have to fill in Form Med 4;"

    Med 4 medical evidence to support an incapacity benefits claim was abolished in 2010 and replaced with the 'fit note' for ESA.

    GPs' (and NHS Consultant doctors) exclusive authority to issue a Med 3 Statement to patients was abolished in 2016 and shared with any old 'health professional' you've never met. UC already does not have to accept a 'fit note' and is now telling GPs not to write one.

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 1,170 Championing
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 1,170 Championing
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • johnnyy85
    johnnyy85 Community Member Posts: 266 Empowering

    Hi Catherine

    Are you confident now that we will win this, with the numbers ?

  • johnnyy85
    johnnyy85 Community Member Posts: 266 Empowering
  • chiarieds
    chiarieds Community Member Posts: 17,441 Championing

    @WhatThe - whilst I can agree with one of your previous comments, but only in part (who has 'demanded' proof with links? I might have, I hoped, politely asked, that's all, & the better to understand - links help, & then a member will draw their own conclusion - so that comment of yours, as you're completely aware, is untrue).

    I do however agree that republishing propaganda may contribute to the 'mental torture' that some members might be putting themselves through. Everyone is trying to help tho, & will do so in their own way. Sharing what they've read in the media isn't trying to 'misinform' anyone else, & many members try to counter misinformation anyway.

    I've got very real concerns about misinformation spreading to the forum, & have done for years, but if you mistrust everyone & every source, as I hope to only use those I find are verifiable, then you & I are never going to agree on that one.

    I don't doubt you that previous reforms have gradually led to where we are today, but members are trying to concentrate on this Green Paper, as yes, there was comparitively 'much less communication by social media in 2012 & 2016'; some members may not even have been using the internet all those years ago.

    As to your 2nd comment, I think the idea was not to take a GP's 'power' away over 'fit' notes, rather acknowledging that this takes time out of a GP's day helping their patients with their medical problems, that it could be seen as a conflict of interest, & that other Healthcare Professionals might be in a better position to evaluate could a person return to work with sometimes reasonable adjustments, for example?

    And 'no' the 'authority' to give out a fit note was not 'shared with any old 'health professional' you've never met,' rather the opposite, as you needed to be their patient too. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that other Healthcare Professionals have only been able to write 'fit' notes since April 2024 (should they wish) as I remember mentioning this on the forum. But don't take my word for it: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-to-overhaul-benefits-system-and-tackle-britains-sick-note-culture-in-welfare-reform-speech

    & a comment from May 2024: https://bjgplife.com/what-drives-the-sick-note-culture-in-the-uk/

    but yes, this is certainly thinking about getting people back into work, tho it's not relevant for PIP which is a disability benefit.

    I'm unsure how a WCA could be initiated without a fit note?

  • charlie72
    charlie72 Community Member Posts: 259 Pioneering

    Even if Reform were to vote in favour of cuts they would still be defeated.

    In favour of welfare changes:

    • Labour loyalists: 412 - 170 = 242
    • Reform UK: 5

    ➡ Total in favour: 242 + 5 = 247 MPs

    🧮 Final Tally:

    • For: 247
    • Against/Abstain: ~390

    🔴 Result: Welfare changes would still fail.

  • Ironside1990
    Ironside1990 Community Member Posts: 401 Pioneering

    i'd never thought we'd see the day that we'd get the Tories as allies.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    I read that but what I find confusing is in the article it says they’re voting against it as it’s not going far enough, yet I’m sure I heard the Tory’s said it was cruel . Mind you it’s the sun so maybe they added their little bit to it .

  • johnnyy85
    johnnyy85 Community Member Posts: 266 Empowering
  • johnnyy85
    johnnyy85 Community Member Posts: 266 Empowering
    edited May 2025

    What I would like to know is what can happen out of the two out comes ?
    It gets rejected ?

    What is the next step for the government will they try again?

    or it passes ?

    Would there be legal challenges ?

  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 5,660 Championing
    edited June 2025

    chiarieds, the PM in both your links is Rishi Sunak.

    "And 'no' the 'authority' to give out a fit note was not 'shared with any old 'health professional' you've never met"

    But it was!! The reforms I mentioned to Med 3 certification were enacted in 2016 and implemented from April 2017 (I think). DWP's subsequent plans will remove GPs entirely from the equation - the ones RS was talking about.

    "I don't doubt you that previous reforms have gradually led to where we are today, but members are trying to concentrate on this Green Paper,"

    It is gobbledegook without reference to existing rules and those rules should not have passed! There's no gradual. We've been conned but not by this PM.

  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 5,660 Championing
    edited June 2025

    The change is about efficiency and appropriateness, not about diminishing the GP’s role.

    That is exactly what was intended. What had served benefits claimants for 20 years was changed through the Welfare Reform and Work Act 2016. There was plenty of concern from GP's and the Local Government Association (LGA) at the time.

    There is zero appropriateness at DWP where claimants' health is concerned.

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 1,170 Championing
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 1,170 Championing
    edited June 2025
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • jasminehoop
    jasminehoop Community Member Posts: 51 Contributor

    It is this PM that's hellbent on supporting the enactment of the proposed legislation, whether or not those changes are only possible because of what was done 10 years ago. (Just so you don't accidentally paint him as any better than his predecessors.)

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    Exactly what I think . IMO it doesn’t matter what was put in place by previous PMs or who’s behind starmer . He’s PM the buck stops with him . The only moral crusade he has is one against the disabled. How are cuts needed to bring the welfare bill down when there’s no mention of getting the fit job seekers work and they’re thinking of scrapping the two child limit and reinstating the WFA ( which I agree with) which cancels out any savings from pip cuts .

  • bton1968
    bton1968 Community Member Posts: 156 Empowering

    the omission of any impact statements tells you everything you need to know about Starmer and his proposed cuts !

  • jul1aorways
    jul1aorways Community Member Posts: 397 Pioneering
    edited June 2025

    Hi Squirrel 🐿️

    I was really wiped out but at least I don't wake up in pain. It's really sad that you have to put up with fibromyalgia too. 😞

    I'm also sad to hear that you are amongst the few with the enhanced DL rate who doesn't have 4 points in any one question. You have such a high level of needs and therefore deserve a high level of support, not to have it all taken off you completely. 😤

    I do hope that this situation will improve for you, hopefully by a lot and for the sake of the rest of us who are going to lose out too.
    I think that MPs have come to understand a great deal about our situation as there has been such a huge outcry by us, our DPOs, charities etc.

    I don't think that the Labour leadership expected this much opposition, in such a short time which has caused MPs to have become a lot more aware of how the impact of the cuts will affect us before the vote.

    Ministers were obviously hoping it would not be until afterwards, long afterwards as it will take another 4 months to get all the impact assessments together for MPs to see.

    I believe that we can have more confidence in MPs than you think. 😊

    As for Kendall and Co, I think we can expect every sort of skullduggery from them.

    I'm only speculating but I do think that if they push up one lot of scoring for standard rate, in their mind, I don't think that they would settle at having one rate, they would want to put up the points for the enhanced rate too.

    I think that they want to try to trick MPs into accepting a different scenario for us that sounds better to begin with but will end up being just as devastating for us in reality.

    MPs look to be onto them them though, with refusing to deal with the leaderships "tweaks." as they call them. I think that the MPs know that ministers are trying to pull the wool over their eyes and are trying to push the vote through too quickly.

    That's why they are trying to get them to slow down so MPs can consider these cuts properly and they insist that we must get a proper say on all points of the proposals.

    I've realised myself that just because large numbers of MPs are abstaining on the vote, instead of voting against, it doesn't mean that this isn't a major government revolt against the leadership and a great threat to Labour party unity. It is, which surprised me too!

    You're right in saying this really isn't about the small amount of money that is needed for us out of this country's vast budget every year. Right wing MPs seem obsessed with doing everything they possibly can large corporations, banks and businesses making obscene amounts of money and looking after the interests of the already rich.

    This is powered by having as many people as possible working to make them as much profit as possible, at any one time.

    This is why we are suffering, as the elderly (WFA) and children (Child Benefit Cap) are having to do, quite unnecessarily. 😡 If you cannot work, or are too young, or old to work then you are considered an expendable burden. Which is appalling, I know. 😞

    That's also why there is no regard for the fact that most of us have worked in the past, the elderly have done so too, or that children are the workers of the future.

    Because of this pathological hated, and the fact that we are an obstacle to their parliamentary ambitions too, especially in the case of Starmer and Co, is why we all believe that they are trying to ruin our lives by removing our vital support.

    I would say that I think that their ideological hatred of us definitely outstrips whether they will save any money or not. They will know, as well as we do that it will cost the country a lot more to improverish us than it will save in the long run, so I would say that this is about their indefensible, ideology driven attitude and political maneuvering not money.

    As Timms has so disgracefully shown us in the last few days. 😡 He should be careful, his actions are not matching his words, demonstrating what their opinion really is of us.

This discussion has been closed.