Green Paper Related Discussions

1119120122124125147

Comments

  • jasminehoop
    jasminehoop Community Member Posts: 51 Contributor

    "And this goes far beyond welfare. We have to be able to make tough reforms that are the right thing to do. If we cannot get this through the consequences are far bigger than just this reform.”

    Apart from the failure to elaborate on what these "consequences" might be, and the mystifying claim that this "goes far beyond welfare", there is an implicit suggestion here that there's some doubt about getting the cuts through as presented. It's quite desperate language they're using - "we have to" and "if we cannot, then..."

    I also notice a tone of real uncertainty in the statement about there not being a clear leader of the rebels, and deep concerns across the party. Something doesn't add up here.

  • Zipz
    Zipz Community Member Posts: 4,345 Championing

    Early this morning, I saw a FB post from a local group, urging PIP claimants to reapply now. I assume they meant report a change of circumstances. The idea is to ensure the claimant is assessed before the 4-point rule and before any change in descriptors. I wouldn't do this myself. I have multiple "fours" and higher scores and some years before reassessment. (I was awarded 10 years.) However, if enough claimants did this, the DWP would be in meltdown.

  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 5,826 Championing

    Passerby Posts: 529 Championing1:15AM edited 1:40AM

    If you think these are tall tales I'm making up, then, Google is your friend.

    If you're expecting to read the DWP saying that it has been giving undisclosed guidelines to its assessors, you would be disappointed big time, I'm afraid.

    If you're so sure of your claims it would be simple for you to provide the source like everyone else does when making grand statements such as these!

    I don't have time to search for it or waste playing games.

  • Zipz
    Zipz Community Member Posts: 4,345 Championing

    How many Bills?

    This is from Benefits & Work:

    Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill Updates

     Published: 18 June 2025

    The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill is due to be published this afternoon.  This is the bill that will enable the introduction of the PIP 4-point rule and cuts to universal credit for disabled claimants.

    We’ll provides links, analysis and the opportunity for you to comment on this page.

    According to the UK parliament website, it is a:  "Bill to make provision to alter the rates of the standard allowance, limited capability for work element and limited capability for work and work-related activity element of universal credit and the rates of income-related employment and support allowance, and to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment."

    Today's First Reading seems only to deal with UC cuts and PIP. There's nothing about the abolition of WCA, ages at which young claimants can claim adult benefits, and much more that is in the Green Paper.

    Have l misread this? Will there be more than one Bill to do with Welfare?

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    If assessors continue to mark down as they currently do the system will go into meltdown. Far worse than when pip first came in and they had to train new judges and hire extra premises. They reckon they can’t u turn as our money has been spent, well they’re going to be paying out more on appeals etc than they costed in

  • Wibbles
    Wibbles Community Member Posts: 3,550 Championing
    edited June 2025
  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    It feels like blackmail to me . If the rebels don’t vote this through things will be worse for other more worthy people. Is this where ending child poverty comes in ? They are supposedly looking into that and two child limit in autumn and hoping to vote for disability cuts asap . Whatever it is it seems as though only sacrificing us can save the country. That’s how I read that and how I’ve felt for a long time .

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    What does this mean ? I thought they were discussing the bill today ready to vote in two weeks time ?

  • jasminehoop
    jasminehoop Community Member Posts: 51 Contributor

    Absolutely agree, it's blackmailing language and that is the only quoted basis for what has been written about in the media in the last day or two. The same quotes rehashed, and they are essentially characterised by a tone of "these are our demands."

  • Zipz
    Zipz Community Member Posts: 4,345 Championing
    edited June 2025

    The First Reading (and the publication of the Bill) is this afternoon. The Second Reading ( and debate and vote) is on 1st July:

    https://commonsbusiness.parliament.uk/Document/95520/Html?subType=Standard#_idTextAnchor004

    Today's Bill appears limited by comparison with proposals set forwards in the Green Paper.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    Oh I was confused as the previous post didn’t show the details of today’s reading

  • luvpink
    luvpink Community Member Posts: 4,877 Championing

    I have never come across a "sadistic" one but ones who clearly didn't understand how my disability impacts my daily life.

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 1,169 Championing
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    Morning luv pink, hope you’re ok .

    My first assessor was definitely sadistic . She barely looked at me then lied I had good eye contact. Ignored all Dr evidence apart from one which she lied about . While report said claimant says she can’t do this I say she can . Zero points .
    Even the assessment centres are the same , they called me 30 minutes before my phone assessment to say no recording available as dwp booked with the wrong person even though dwp don’t make the appointment. Assessor seemed lovely but I wasn’t falling for that . She increased my care to enhanced and decreased mobility ( got back at MR) . I couldn’t work out why . Now when I check my points I see where I should of gotten at least a 4 but she was steering me towards 2, points

  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 5,826 Championing
    edited June 2025

    Passerby Posts: 530 Championing8:32AM

    You're not obliged to believe it. Neither will it affect your right to believe

    Others might and that's my point.

    {moderated content}

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    I do believe it . I know of someone who trained to do the job of assessor and was so disgusted by the tactics of them being taught how to turn us down I’d believe anything.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    I think when / if this passes there will be aspects of the bill challenged in court . We can see where they are discriminating against us in so many ways and think certain parts will be challenged and changed . I imagine now they can’t as nothing is in law yet 🤞

  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 5,826 Championing
    edited June 2025

    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 1,592 Championing10:09AM

    I do believe it .

    That's the problem with misinformation - it's repeated and people start to believe it.

    Passerby is claiming "undisclosed guidelines" are given to assessors and failed to notice the rest of DWP's response. This is simply untrue.

  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 5,826 Championing

    No, it was a DWP response to a Freedom of Information request.

This discussion has been closed.