Upcoming changes to benefits

1131416181988

Comments

  • luvpink
    luvpink Online Community Member Posts: 1,943 Championing
    edited March 12

    Good grief!

    Is this Marcus bloke a Liebour MP ?

  • Mysteriouskitten
    Mysteriouskitten Online Community Member Posts: 36 Empowering

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/mar/12/there-is-no-moral-case-labour-divided-over-prospect-of-benefit-cuts

  • Mysteriouskitten
    Mysteriouskitten Online Community Member Posts: 36 Empowering

    Press text, should open in Google.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 673 Championing

    I’m really confused as I’ve watched YouTube channels that have said the opposite to what is in the msm. I know no one knows completely what their plans are but I’m hearing two different ends of the spectrum. And they seem knowledgeable channels too as I watch mostly YouTube so I know there are some that aren’t so reputable.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 673 Championing
    edited March 12
  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 673 Championing

    Are any of the front bench labour certainly Starmer reeves Kendall and Timms aren’t

  • luvpink
    luvpink Online Community Member Posts: 1,943 Championing

    No but regardless I have no idea who this Marcus bloke is hence why I asked is he a Liebour MP?

    I have never heard of him.

  • luvpink
    luvpink Online Community Member Posts: 1,943 Championing

    Sorry to be vague but I have been out today and I seem to have missed a few things.

    Who is Noah?

    Does anyone have a link to the video please?

  • Andi66
    Andi66 Online Community Member Posts: 905 Championing

    Can you send.a link please for noah, as when I looked some were dated last year

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 673 Championing

    I think it’s easy to take newspapers with a bit of caution but when it was itv news it seems more truthful, especially as if it’s false leak or just taken out of context labour hasn’t come out and clarified anything. Their own backbenchers are worried which must mean they’re not privy to and information themselves. Though I agree Noah seems to know what he’s talking about as opposed to some YouTubers who are good at giving the information but maybe not reading between the lines.

  • Andi66
    Andi66 Online Community Member Posts: 905 Championing
  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 673 Championing

    I hadn’t heard of any of the 36 who wrote the letter of support for Starmer . So no I haven’t heard of him either. Seems like someone trying to make a name for himself like the 36 who wrote that letter of support.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 673 Championing

    He has a YouTube channel called Noah bear Nyle . The other is A different bias. Both have a more positive view on the situation. Worth a watch . Was recommended by snuggles earlier and are interesting. Obviously no one knows anything for sure yet though .

  • Ironside1990
    Ironside1990 Online Community Member Posts: 310 Empowering

    I don't think he's in Government. Just a troll.

    I don't think any politician would write BS in a tweet.

  • charlie72
    charlie72 Online Community Member Posts: 149 Empowering

    No problems, here is the link, hope it works okay.

    https://www.youtube.com/@noahbearnylelife8580

  • ancojo
    ancojo Online Community Member Posts: 30 Contributor
  • ancojo
    ancojo Online Community Member Posts: 30 Contributor

    Ok this is a question somebody may be able to answer?

    Lets say they do cut LWRCA payment (I wont ramble on about how I think about how immoral etc that would be) does the previous transitional protection (TP) from moving over from legacy benefits to UC not kick back as you would be worse off on UC than you were on Legacy? If so this surely should boost whatever LCWRA cuts are made back up to more or less the same amount?

    Is there no law or such that states that when switched you were not to be worse off on UC which these cuts would now cause?

    I hope this makes sense?

  • Kimi87
    Kimi87 Online Community Member Posts: 4,956 Championing
    edited March 12

    As the law stands TP only ever reduces. TP is added to a UC award so at the time of transfer you aren't worse off than on legacy benefits.

    New laws would need to be introduced to raise TP again if a previously awarded element (which itself reduced TP) ceased.

  • ancojo
    ancojo Online Community Member Posts: 30 Contributor

    Just to add an example of what I mean this was our award figures:-

    *Transitional protection

    £390.37

    You get this because of other benefits you were on before you moved to Universal Credit. The payment will continue until you have a significant change of circumstances.*

    *****Then added to the LCWRA group and awarded LCWRA payment*****

    *Limited capability for work and work-related activity

    £416.19

    You said your health affects you at work or prevents you from working*

    *********
    The LCWRA payment is more than TP which now means you no longer need the TP uplift as you are no longer worse of on UC than you were on Legacy?

    So if they cut LCWRA by 20% about £104 that would mean LWRCA figure is now about £312 not £416 which is now £78 lower than what the TP payment of £390 meaning the switch from legacy to UC has now made us worse off by £78!

    Oh and this is based on 20% so if its 40% it would £156 worse off or 50% it would be £195!

    Point being they would now be going against the TP payment uplift which was added to stop people from being worse off switching from legacy.

    Again I hope this makes sense?

This discussion has been closed.