The Green Paper Discussion (the document link is here too!)

1272830323376

Comments

  • Middleton
    Middleton Community Member Posts: 268 Empowering

    Youve missed the point.. If this magical 4 is now thee criteria, it makes sense that those reassessments will be far easier to process.

    It would be those with 2s-3's that they would look into more

  • Martinp
    Martinp Community Member Posts: 248 Empowering

    I have been thinking about this constantly and whatever way I look at it there is no sense in what Labour are doing, I am left with only one possible explanation and that is they deliberately want to cause us harm and humiliation.

  • Middleton
    Middleton Community Member Posts: 268 Empowering
    edited March 2025

    Collate all the previous 4's.. they have all those records.. Simple Q of "are you the same" etcetc…

    "Yes"! .. this way, its far more streamlined

    If 4 is the main focus and criteria, thats where the focus will be

  • Middleton
    Middleton Community Member Posts: 268 Empowering
  • Pirate008
    Pirate008 Community Member Posts: 12 Listener

    PIP Ongoing award for those over retirement age. Whats happening ?

    I am 71 with a ongoing award for PIP, this is due for a review ( "soft touch" ) in December 2027. I have 12 points for mobility and 9 for Daily Living with the the highest score of 3 in one section, Following the green paper yesterday with the new rule of 4 required from November 2026 to maintain the daily living element, what can O do to try and make sure I don't lose it before my soft touch review in December 2027.

    I suffer with muscular dystrophy (no cure/hereditary) & Copd. MD is a progressive condition and will not get any better and will only get worse over time. My original claim was in 2017 and although I have not had a sudden worsening of this condition I have had a worsening over the period from 2017. This has affected how I do or can't do things. Should I ask for a reassessment ?

  • Jenwren
    Jenwren Community Member Posts: 104 Empowering

    Probably that they want as many people off PIP as quickly as they can whether legally or not - disqualify, die, don't have energy to reapply, shove them in with unemployment - anything that they can boast about their stats. If they can suddenly make mental health Not Real according to Dr Wes Streeting, MD, PhD then image how many that will slash off PIP. It's about numbers that they can show the public - "look we got rid of all the lazy kids getting free cars, and all the people pretending their bipolar, cancer, severe depression, amputated limbs, CFS, MS, Huntingdon's was 'preventing' them from working - we've got them all contributing to the economy now hooray!" - so they can then put it into defense to appease Trump. This was not in their manifesto, it's a knee-jerk reaction and a panicked reaction to them having a hole in finances and them being also absolutely unwilling to do a wealth tax on the wealtheist in society because my God that would end civilisation! In essence they aren't thinking and don't care to.

  • Gregam
    Gregam Community Member Posts: 16 Listener

    Hi All

    I must say when I start reading from page one it seems more positive for me, but by the time I get to page 34 of comments if feels like I have had it!! I have ptsd , anxiety and depression and emtional dysregulation, I get LCWRA and PIP I scored 10 for journey and 6 for mixing with people do I stand a chance? Or have I lost it all?

    Thanks

    Anna

  • YogiBear
    YogiBear Community Member Posts: 410 Pioneering

    I'm going to try and give my response to the Green Paper. I really don't know where to start and how to respond to it.

  • evelyncourtney
    evelyncourtney Community Member Posts: 104 Empowering

    Wait where did they say it’s going to be new criteria?

  • Middleton
    Middleton Community Member Posts: 268 Empowering
  • Andi66
    Andi66 Community Member Posts: 1,416 Championing

    Timms was justifying the changes to one backbenchers. Timms is a disgrace. Starmer also defending at pmqs evil

  • Jenwren
    Jenwren Community Member Posts: 104 Empowering

    Try writing out a draft in word or on paper before you send it, Maybe just start with your emotions and how you feel and expand from there. I feel the same - where do you begin with this? You can also try to use an AI (chatgpt or claude) and tell it how you are feeling -your emotions etc and ask it to help either draft something for you that you can refine or edit or write something as ask claude/chatgpt to structure it a bit more.

  • bench
    bench Community Member Posts: 147 Empowering

    So I am in ESA work related activity group even though I think I should be in the support group, I haven't had to do any work related activities due to severe anxiety disorder I also get pip standard both, so as I seem to get it there merging jobseeker with ESA wrag ,does this mean we lose our money for bring in a group ? I had the dreaded ESA50 so waiting on a reassessment ,go push them to put me in support group, really uncertain times 😒

  • YogiBear
    YogiBear Community Member Posts: 410 Pioneering

    Thank you for your advice. It's much appreciated. I just feel deflated today. I'm not good at doing any of this.

  • Middleton
    Middleton Community Member Posts: 268 Empowering

    They also have barristers and solicitors!..

    Even if it does go through as they plan; all we can do is give reams of proof regarding our conditions,and refute any incorrect judgments by the assessors.

    As for forcing disabled people into the workforce, there would be plenty of reprisals in regards to the dangers &risk of injuries all round, and those people who chose to place those people into that position will be legally held accountable.

  • Prinko
    Prinko Community Member Posts: 22 Contributor

    From anyone else reading it, does it read as if the merger situation would only be applicable to new claimants? I was reading previous green papers where something similar (a one benefit thing) has been proposed but has never materialised.
    Also, usually with new changes, they ‘honour’ existing claims by keeping them as is and only applying them to new claims.
    Any thoughts?

  • Jenwren
    Jenwren Community Member Posts: 104 Empowering

    You're welcome, I feel the same. I don't know what's worse actually knowing what the want to do (although ultimately I think it's better to know than guess) or whether people will be able too claw back the worst of this. My hope is that the tories tried do to this (or variations) a lot and weren't able to. It makes no sense legally that you can be disabled or sick - your condition and situation does not change or gets worse - one day you qualify for PIp, the next assesment you don't because they'd changed the numbers. A lot of this going against the Disability Act 2010. Mental health including in young people will not go away because your govt mocks it and refuses to acknowledge it. There are only a finite amount of jobs in this country and most employers will go for a health/non-disabled one over one who is.

    I do know a lot of non disabled don't agree with this. It's also going to impact on carers - family/friends and professional ones, it's going to impact disabled people's families, it's going to impact disabled people's employers when they can no longer afford to go to work, its going to massively affect the NHS, GPs, it'll effect the economy when disabled people can no longer purchase goods and services, it'll effect MPs when all these people refuse to vote for them. This isn't the first 'punching down' they've done.

    They've gone after pensioners, children (two child cap), international aid (which ironically actually keeps us safer) - and let's not forget the whole Middle East situation. They've upset a lot of people. They need to show they aren't the Tories but are so afraid of Reform and Trump that they are trying to appeal to that demographic that will never vote for them anyway. This wasn't in their manifesto, it's a knee jerk reaction to Trump demanding increased defense spending and a panic that they have a black hole in their finances.

    The fact is if they had the courage of their predesors like Clement Attlee who introduced the welfare state, (who'd most likely be disgusted by this Labour) they'd bring in a wealth tax that people are begging on people wealth (not their earnings but their assets) over £10 mil. That'd raise I believe £24 mil - so a bit more than their £5-6 mil saving. But they are cowards. And cowards only know how to punch down. They've also most likely gaurenteed themselves to be a one term governement. Feel free to use any of this in your comments to them or plonk into AI. Try to be kind and patient with yourself, this is a awful shock to all our systems.

  • mawempathy
    mawempathy Community Member Posts: 150 Empowering

    My parents are life-long Labour supporters, who loathe the Tories with passion, and do anything they can to ensure the Cons lose where they live - even voting tactically. Both of them say this isn't the Labour party anymore, and they'll never vote for them again. My Dad already had his WFA stripped away, which really affected him, and now this has tipped them over the edge.

    The next election is potentially going to be one like we've never seen before. Tory voters disgusted with Tories, Labour voters disgusted with Labour. If they think the welfare state is untenable, they might also want to consider how sustainable their blind ideology is towards punishing the poorest in society.

  • Prinko
    Prinko Community Member Posts: 22 Contributor

    Thanks summerlove, so does that mean we are essentially ‘safe’ until 2028? I only receive NS ESA support group, no other benefit.

This discussion has been closed.