The Green Paper Discussion (the document link is here too!)
Comments
-
I cannot believe, truly how brutal they are being but also so arrogant its worse than the WFP axe. They cant accept people have different levels of sickness and disability.
I waited 14 years to see the Tories kicked out and replaced by Tories II a straight to streeting sequel, who seems to think shouting his mouth off about everything solves everything.
there are thousands of people just waiting for NHS ops then get back to work, they know this
Nah lets spaff the money on these "reforms" instead.
0 -
Omg they questioned a cash withdrawal ?
I will be having a 'bank statements review' in the coming months and im even more worried now.....
How dare they be so intrusive .
2 -
I also have cervical spondylosis,chiari malformation,amongst other things and my husband washes my hair and my back etc I still only ever get 2 points
2 -
No, they dont ask what were spending on. I think one of the main things is if we're filtering money out into anothet account and bumping our savings up (chance would be a fine thing!)
Also any large sums of money moving around. I think it's more for fraud.
I was worried because Id recently adopted a rescue cat for £100 and I thought she might say I shouldnt be spending on things like that, but she was quite the opposite actually and said how good pets are for people with health problems.
So I don't think there's anything to worry about 🙂
Let us know how it goes won't you.
2 -
Thanks so much loucie. Xx
0 -
I've been thinking this as well. I don't know if it will effect the likes of me or any other current claimants. I'm currently on ESA (CB) and in the support group at present. I did raise some of your points you mentioned when I was filling in my response to the Green Paper.
0 -
but this measure is up for consultation and I hope it can be legally appealed. So 🤞🏻
0 -
I have started using cash more and won't be told I can't .based on the amount of scams etc at the moment I feel safer using cash 🤷🏻♀️
7 -
I'm not sure. We need clarification on this.
0 -
I think next time we need to record ourselves even if they do as their equipment can “ breakdown “ . Now we will all have to go to appeal over this as you should get 4? Points . The tribunal will be busy . This happened with the DLA to PIP . It will cost to train extra tribunal staff as it did before
0 -
Chiari malformation is one of the investigations theyre looking into for myself. Also, have
spondylosis+ c5-6-7 spinal stenosis.
Im not sure how low my cerebellum tonsils drop; from the MRI's ,it doesn't look as jammed down into the spinal column as some other folks, but nonetheless!
I'm convinced it's what's affecting my vision: bright zipping lights and flashes that are peripheral. Although i have this one zipper, like a grain of rice-coloured electric blue lol that comes in from outfield to quick centre then off again😂.. seems to have a darker centre!
Had my eyes checked extensively, twice; and got the all-clear for the eyeballs, so!..😎..
I had read the cerebellum tonsils is where vision is linked?🤷
1 -
Good luck hope all goes smoothly
1 -
I think I heard is mentioned that assessors will be more skilled.
Even if this is the case; many GPS are'nt necessarily adept at times.
I have a long convo with a lovely lady from CA who i detected,,as we proceeded to chat; had far more general knowledge of my co-morbid's and symptoms; than many assessors and some gps!
I had to ask her if she had a medical degree. She mentioned that she had worked in the "field"(she didn't stipulate) in the past. In 7+yrs of interviews, she was hands down the most knowledgeable person I had chatted to concerning my issues. Whereas the assessor who came to my home 6+yrs ago, who was an ex-paramedic; had no general clue concerning my specific ailments.
So what skills will these new or retrained assessors, have?. They've often given me zeroes, where corroborating evidence was given by an entire team of specialists, that should have given me close to maximum points.
0 -
I think they've done one potentially useful thing, maybe. I don't think governments of any type are typically in the business of doing useful things that people ask for. We've had one or two decent goverments historically that've actually helped make things fairer and better but there's a reason places like France are now debating about a wealth tax to pay for their increased defense because they do not tolerate govts treating them like this. I think I read the UN considered our disability and certainly our treatement and attitude (from govt) about mental health to be one (or the) worst in developed nations.
1 -
Hi @userinfo1 please stay strong and remember you have a community here. I know the past 48 hours have been really intense and difficult but it will ease. I'm going to pop you an email imminently - please keep an eye out for it. 💛
2 -
I haven't seen it but I'll check it out, possibly tomorrow. I'm just drained today and have to rest and just take a break from the news - it's been a few weeks of gut churning panic and then the damn green bill…urgh.
I heard she won a big case but I don't know the details. Do you mean think tanks are saying they need to save £100m or these 'reforms' will cause £100m in 'savings'? With her did you mean Rachel Reeves or Liz Kendall (or both?) They should do but they won't. I don't see it happening. They look like they think they've got some 'holy mission' to get people into work - and unfortuntely that plays well to the media - even the liberal media who've been pathetic about push back and challenging a lot of misconceptions, - and to the public. On Question Time a couple of weeks back one of the actual questions was about lazy people on disability benefits - it wasn't a comment, it was a question. Even people agueing against these cuts in the media, even the MPs fighting with us - you'll notice they're all very careful to say 'oh of course people should be in work as much as possible'. But yes I agree they need to go. Problem is they won't.
1 -
It does look like those of us who are unable to work and have no way out of that are going to be punished for being disabled (again), while they plan to give more to people who are able to work but don't. It's austerity plus!
0 -
Thanks mad question a £50 withdrawal, I withdrew much more that that as I like shopping for a bargain on Facebook marketplace are they going to what prove of what a brought, surly it none of their business
1 -
Hi @middali I hope you're feeling a bit better today. I know it's been a really intense few days but please stay safe and remember you have a supportive community here that care. I'm going to pop you an email now - please keep an eye out for it. 💜
0 -
They've said in their damn Green Paper that they're restarting reassessments/reviews.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 14.8K Start here and say hello!
- 7K Coffee lounge
- 78 Games den
- 1.7K People power
- 91 Announcements and information
- 22.9K Talk about life
- 5.4K Everyday life
- 213 Current affairs
- 2.3K Families and carers
- 850 Education and skills
- 1.8K Work
- 486 Money and bills
- 3.5K Housing and independent living
- 970 Transport and travel
- 673 Relationships
- 65 Sex and intimacy
- 1.4K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.4K Talk about your impairment
- 853 Rare, invisible, and undiagnosed conditions
- 910 Neurological impairments and pain
- 2K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.2K Autism and neurodiversity
- 37.5K Talk about your benefits
- 5.8K Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
- 19K PIP, DLA, ADP and AA
- 7.3K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.4K Benefits and income