Green Paper Related Discussions

1126127129131132148

Comments

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    My experience with the first pip assessor was almost identical. She lied on the report about the only dr letter she acknowledged, the rest she ignored. My GP said it’s the first time he’s had his letter ignored and he went through my award letter and counteracted everything. She also wrote X says she can’t do this but I say she can zero points .

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    Morning Charlie,

    I just migrated over to uc and I called them probably about less than a couple of months ago . I asked about them reassuring everyone on lcwra and the girl who was nice said they have no plans to and don’t have the staff even if they wanted to .

  • Holly_Scope
    Holly_Scope Posts: 5,308 Online Community Team

    Hi @secretsquirrel1 a member of the team will respond to your private message imminently. Best wishes, Holly.

  • michael57
    michael57 Community Member Posts: 2,830 Championing

    haha if you hold the wire tight and hold someone elses hand they get a harder shock whilst not hurting yourself

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    If this were the case MW the assessment centres could rectify this by giving those who deserve longer awards . They seem to keep reassessing some of us when there’s some still on DLA . Not only that but the call centre themselves actually lied to me so they didn’t have to record my assessment. If they recorded it I should have been given the 4? Point. Even the dwp said it had nothing to do with the dwp as it’s the assessment centres who make the decisions. I know someone who went with someone and the assessor saw this person but said they arrived by themselves. It’s outright lying . I don’t trust them and never will after my first assessment left me fighting for two years

  • Wibbles
    Wibbles Community Member Posts: 3,466 Championing

    ……….Yet they continue with HS2 - which is currently estimated to cost over £100 billion - for a few minutes off the time taken to get to Birmingham from OUTSIDE London… seems they've got their priorities are completely wrong.

  • michael57
    michael57 Community Member Posts: 2,830 Championing

    Haha you never know what I am going to come out with that's why I don't say to much if I was coffee that I hate it would be unfiltered

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    I just have no trust in them . I was told by dwp my last assessment would be a quick one . The assessor took over two hours going through everything in a form I’d filled out 18 months prior . She kept saying if I don’t answer they may have to call me back and it may not be her . But if that’s true why do I hear of people having quick phone calls and that’s it ? As I said my first assessor lied so much my GP was furious as was the dwp themselves

  • AppleJacks
    AppleJacks Posts: 89 Empowering
  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    The fact you had assessments so close together is really stressful but thank god someone saw sense and finally awarded you correctly. Now my last assessor had all my information including specialist letters of diagnosis, all medical notes and supping letter from GPs over the years. My form was the short form that gave the option of no change. It was filled out completely yet assessor went through everything and back to my childhood. I have ME so I was exhausted and begging her how much longer. She said if I couldn’t answer a question they may call me back . I now can see she was steering me towards 2 point answers and ignored my replies which would have given me a 4 even though it’s in my answers on the form . She increased my award to enhanced and lowered my mobility which I didn’t understand. Though I got mobility back at MR . I suspect the 4 point rule was being spoken of then .

  • YogiBear
    YogiBear Community Member Posts: 415 Pioneering

    No MR is not stopping. I predict what will happen if the current proposals go through is if claimants don't get 4 points when applying/reassessed they'll ask for a MR or go to appeal to hopefully get the 4 points.

  • YogiBear
    YogiBear Community Member Posts: 415 Pioneering

    Benefits & Work - 19 June 2025

    News

    Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill in brief

     Published: 19 June 2025

    The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill was published yesterday and is expected to be voted on for the first time in the Commons  at the beginning of July.  Below are the main provisions of the bill.

    Personal Independence Payment

    4-point rule

    The Bill introduces the 4-point rule from a date yet to be announced, but intended to be November 2026.

    From that date, new claimants will need to score:

    • at least 8 points, including at least 4 points for a single daily living activity, to get an award of the standard rate of the daily living component;
    • at least 12 points, including at least 4 points for a single daily living activity, to get an award of the enhanced rate of the daily living component.

    Existing claimants will keep their current award until it is reviewed from November 2026, at which point they will be subject to the 4-point rule. 

    So, if you have a review before November 2026, you will be subject to the existing rules, not the 4-point rule. 

    There has been no indication from the DWP that they will bring forward anyone’s review dates.  So, if your next review is not due for say, another four years, then that is when you will be subject to the 4-point rule.

    Pension-age PIP

    There is a clause in the bill which allows the DWP to make “different provision for persons of different ages” which may be used to exempt claimants who have reached pension age by November 2026.  But there has been no official announcement about this and, at the moment, there are no different regulations for people of pension age.

    Universal credit

    Changes are being made to the rates of universal credit (UC) and, in addition, a severe conditions criteria category is being introduced.  (Similar rules are being put in place for ESA claimants who have not been migrated to UC by April 2026)

    UC standard rates

    The standard rates of UC will increase each year by more than the rate of inflation.  Using the 2026/27 rate as the

    • severe conditions criteria claimant  £423.27
    • claimant who is terminally ill  £423.27
    • any other claimant with limited capability for work and work-related activity £217.26

    This means that the LCWRA rate for new claimants from April 2026 will be almost halved.

    The DWP has begun WCA reviews again. So existing LCWRA claimants may have their award reviewed before April 2026.  But if you do not have a review before that date, or you maintain your LCWRA status when you are reviewed, then you will receive the pre-2026 claimant rate from April 2026.

    Severe conditions criteria

    From April 2026, a new category of LCWRA is being introduced.  In order to be in the severe conditions criteria (SCC) group, a clamant has firstly to meet one of the LCWRA criteria.  You can find a list of the criteria here.

    In addition, all of the following criteria need to be met:

    The level of function constantly applies to the claimant.  So, conditions that vary in severity may not meet this requirement.

    The claimant will have the condition for the rest of their life.   So, conditions which might be cured by transplant/ surgery/treatments or conditions which might resolve may not meet this requirement.

    It must have been diagnosed by an appropriately qualified health care professional in the course of the provision of NHS services.  So, it would appear that a diagnosis via a private doctor or consultant would not be acceptable.

    If a claimant meets all these criteria they will be classed as having a severe, lifelong health condition and will not be subject to routine reassessment.

    What isn’t in the bill

    The bill only covers the PIP 4-point rule and changes to the rates of UC, plus the severe conditions criteria, which were added at the last minute as a concession to Labour rebels. 

    It doesn’t, for example, deal with the abolition of the work capability assessment, the proposed new Unemployment Insurance or the plan to change the PIP assessment criteria.  These and other Green Paper proposals will be the subject of legislation at a later date.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    Does anyone know if the pip and uc bill is being passed as a money bill ? I ask after reading a comment on another site

  • rach_90
    rach_90 Community Member Posts: 38 Contributor

    I can’t remember where I read it now, but it reported that it didn’t appear to be introduced as a money bill by the labour government.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    Hi yogi

    What’s your opinion on the severe category? When they say must be consistent conditions what would that mean exactly as I have several conditions and I bet most of us do . So my conditions ME and fibromyalgia plus arthritis etc they fluctuate throughout the day . So every day I’ll get some symptoms but not necessarily the same ie migraines can last weeks caused by fibromyalgia, fatigue up and down every day as us pain . Do they mean if for instance we have one good day ( not that I do anymore) that won’t class as severe ? Would they class lifelong as something that has no cure by nhs guidelines ? And supposing you have a condition with no cure and in the case of ME/ fatigue no treatment but no 4 point how does that work out ?

  • charlie72
    charlie72 Community Member Posts: 259 Pioneering

    Hi, I rang Scope about it last week after reading the same comment, they said they know nothing about it, probably just more useless clickbait and scaremongering, but people do keep bringing it up as theyv'e 'read' it somewhere, as far as I know it's complete hearsay and nonsense, like I say that came from Scope when I rang them.

  • YogiBear
    YogiBear Community Member Posts: 415 Pioneering

    @secretsquirrel1 I was thinking this myself. I think we need to have more clarification on this.

  • rach_90
    rach_90 Community Member Posts: 38 Contributor

    I keep trying to work this severe category out. I have hemiplegic cerebral palsy, use 4 different walking appliances to walk, i can’t move my foot and have foot drop.

    I can barely move my left hand, to grasp things, and have no finer motor skills in my hand either. my “good” also has problems now from a lifetime of overcompensating for the taking my body weight and keep my balance.

    I have obviously can’t be cured, have a diagnosis from a NHS consultant etc, who knows if I meet the criteria.

  • luvpink
    luvpink Community Member Posts: 4,560 Championing

    I was early ill health retired from my career at age 47

    All reasonable adaptions were tried and failed and the occupational health Doctor and specialist consultant did reports stating I am unable to do any kind of work, yet I have been reassessed every three years for benefits.

    Its ludicrous and a waste of time.

    My condition has deteriorated over the years and I have supplied medical evidence proving it yet I still get hauled up, rather than them accepting my situation and granting me ongoing award.

This discussion has been closed.