Scope's reply to the governments planned concessions to the green paper.

1282931333456

Comments

  • Passerby
    Passerby Online Community Member Posts: 860 Championing

     @Catherine21

    Deserves a gold medal. She fought an amazing fight for a cause she believes. She has persevered through this volatile and deeply frustrating and fearsome situation, demonstrating outstanding courage and determination with great effort and energy.

    Untitled Image
  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 1,009 Championing

    Yes, as I am talking about what I have heard live in the debate.

    That quote is typed in bad english, but looks like it says if someone requests a reassessment, it will be under the new rules. However the english is bad, its hard to treat it with credibility.

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 1,009 Championing

    Yeah I thought so, the quote I replied to just above, isnt even a proper phrase, a misspeak (or typo) makes sense, and good its confirmed.

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 1,009 Championing

    Kendall was asked in the session if the changes are complaint with human rights and equality laws, and gave a straight yes, so she is in trouble with ministerial code if someone proves her wrong.

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 1,009 Championing
    edited July 1

    From my understanding you will be protected, and I am saying this with high confidence.

    1 - you should be migrated before the date the new law comes into effect.
    2 - for WCA puposes you are an existing claimant.

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 1,009 Championing

    Thanks for this.

    This quote from the reply you got, seems to be a strong indicator, so that the protection is only a 2 year reprieve for the intermediate 4 point change.

    Once the review of PIP descriptors is complete and implemented, any reassessments will be made against the new descriptors

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 1,009 Championing
    edited July 1

    In my opinion its the prime policy of this government, look how early they did it after the election, the rush for the pip descriptor overhaul as well, all the pre election campaigning from Kendall.

    Plus factor in the Labour parties history, although you mentioned earlier you felt Keir was going to be compassionate, there was little evidence of that, a sympathetic disability shadow minister got moved to a whip role, Kendall got moved to the top DWP job, Reeve is chancellor, so its a Blairite party, Blair has made it public what he thinks of disabled people, Labour have always been ideologically opposed (as an official stance) of Incapacity benefit, and they tried to kick a million sick people off with ESA.

    Politically I agree he is weaker for sure, but they are getting their main thing put through, even if the full effect will be delayed by a few years from the concessions.

  • alexroda
    alexroda Online Community Member Posts: 247 Pioneering

    Some rebel MPs are willing to vote in favour of this bill now because their current disabled constituents are protected.

    As long as I’m ok, who cares for the rest.

    Sickening

    What will happen to that 55 year old who is now working in full health and in 2027 becomes disabled, but not enough to score 4 points in one descriptor?

    No UC health element either?

    And then what, poverty-death

    What does it say about us as a society?

    It’s just sickening and evil

  • mawempathy
    mawempathy Online Community Member Posts: 150 Empowering
    edited July 1

    We’ll all earn our points using the revised descriptors, but existing PIP claimants won’t need to hit 4 points for any of the categories.

    The 4 points requirement is written into the main bill, existing claimants will be exempted from it in said bill, and is not part of the Timms assessment review.

    That said, they have the freedom to make it as hard as they want to be awarded points using the revised descriptors. They could easily take it back up to 250,000 plus being put into poverty using this mechanism. This is the sense by which people are suggesting MP’s will be giving the government a blank cheque later today if they pass this bill.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 2,042 Championing
  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 2,042 Championing

    I’m sure I even read one of them say that too . Happy for my constituents

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 1,009 Championing
    edited July 1

    Logically timms review is going to be tougher eligibility, as the primary reason for is to cut caseload.
    So that existing claimants are not exempt from it is not something to be ignored, it is a big deal.

    The main difference is we have no idea what the changes will be, whilst with the 4 point requirement we know who will be affected by it. The 4 point system is just a bridge until the permanent timms changes come into play, as they were so desperate to make changes they were too impatient to wait until 2028.

    The numbers you mentioned is very likely. They still going to hit their target, but now they have more time to prepare for it (due to the intermediate 4 point exemption) and to get try and get charities on side.

  • mawempathy
    mawempathy Online Community Member Posts: 150 Empowering

    I’m not even convinced they’ll try to get charities on side. They’ll claim to have consulted with them, but probably just ignore almost all of the suggestions and plough ahead with their plan. The bill doesn’t compel Timms to do anything more than have a few conversations with disabled people and disability groups.

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 1,009 Championing

    Yeah, they say time is a healer, and what you say is plausible. :(

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,542 Championing

    I got a feeling thier going cancel it

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,542 Championing

    Same as me goes back 2023 cortisol must be through the roof they had deliberately made everything worse seems like they want it too collapse

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,542 Championing

    100 percent working for the big guys I bet they didn't bank on starmer being so inadequate and basically really disliked and can really understand the flip flop nickname but for sure done deliberately

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,542 Championing

    It will become clear once the bill is passed then we will see real cruelness in what world would you ever think mps vote blind I'm preying it doesn't pass imagine them doing whatever they want with no challenge I'm really thinking wishful maybe ! That this will be thrown in the bin end of

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,542 Championing

    If you have migration letter you have 3 months to do so or your lose you esa

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,542 Championing

    I'm dreading it because on my spending I can't stop even knowing I be migrating I saved for air-conditioning oh its bliss I'm so fair I'm definitely not sun lover but it's good to know migration went smoothly my neighbour said they didn't ask him for bank statements?

This discussion has been closed.