Upcoming changes to benefits

191012141588

Comments

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 673 Championing

    it’s a rollercoaster Catherine . And they know they’re causing suffering. Psychopaths all of them especially Starmer . Who’s taking Starmer to court ? I haven’t heard anything about that . Who’s fifi ? Glad her bloods came back good . Anything medical is such a worry.

  • Slonvinton
    Slonvinton Online Community Member Posts: 67 Empowering

    We all know that the 1billion they reinvest in employment support willl mostly be wasted- they have never managed to make any impact in getting employers to take us on.

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 5,266 Championing

    Well I seen hope its true supreme court over connections to EU breaking some brexit rules and not consulting or following laws

  • Moorgater
    Moorgater Online Community Member Posts: 65 Empowering

    Hi. Do you mind me asking who your MP is? (If you'd rather not say, that's fine of course).

    I'm just trying to get an idea of who may be on our side. I suspect that there may be unease beyond the usual suspects.

  • evelyncourtney
    evelyncourtney Online Community Member Posts: 104 Empowering

    I think I’m going to email my MP, but I read last night that he voted for WFA cuts. (Even though there’s a lot of deprivation in my constituency. But who cares about the vulnerable right.)

  • Hobbit25
    Hobbit25 Online Community Member Posts: 11 Contributor

    My MP voted for it too and it makes me feel awkward mailing her but I am still going to. I don't expect to get anywhere with her but at least I'll have tried to get my voice out there.

  • Meg24
    Meg24 Online Community Member Posts: 390 Trailblazing

    None of it is making sense, if they're not going to cut LCWRA, they can't be thinking of cutting LCW surely? They get so little as it is which is one reason we have so many foodbanks. If I was on basic LCW rate as it is now I'd be homeless, if they cut it further I'd be literally starving, they have got to stop floating around mad ideas just to see what fightback they get, it's so Trumpian and it's not what I voted for.

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 902 Championing

    There is no LCW component on UC, its a classification but doesnt add extra money, so LCW will be bumped the same as base I assume.

  • Slonvinton
    Slonvinton Online Community Member Posts: 67 Empowering

    Yeah there is nothing to cut for the LCW group as they have no extra add on like LCWRA. If they wanted to cut money to those in LCW it would have to be a negative add on if you got into LCW…. could they do that- surely thats even worse than cutting LCWRA from a PR perspective.

  • ThirtySixteen
    ThirtySixteen Online Community Member Posts: 53 Empowering

    But it will be a negative for a lot of people on LCWRA too.
    For instance we were FORCED to move over to UC and as such we were awarded the transitional protection of £420.
    Then, we were awarded LCWRA and got the disabled element of £416. This ate up all but £4 of the transitional element. That’s fair enough.

    But if they take it then we will be £416 worse off after being FORCED over to UC.

    Surely this can’t be legal.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 673 Championing

    I just watched the video recommended on here , Noah bear Nyle life. She said she thinks they mean they will allow ppl to work and still claim benefits for a certain time which in affect means lcwra will be classed as lower . It’s a bit confusing so I’ll need to watch again but it did seem more positive.

  • Grissom123
    Grissom123 Online Community Member Posts: 114 Empowering

    Surely they should've done that from the beginning?

    They're basically acknowledging that they threw these plans together without even considering the effect they would have on vulnerable claimants.

    They're doing the same exact thing the Tories did - throwing together plans with no regard for the effect they will have for the sole purpose of winning favour with voters. Except its not working out so well for them.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 673 Championing

    Catherine did you watch YouTube video recommended on here ? Noah bear nyle life. She explains what she thinks they could mean about lcwra getting less money. She thinks , if I understand this correctly, that they’ll be allowing the people in the job seeker part to keep their benefits for a set time so it means then they’ll be getting more than lcwra without cutting lcwra . Obviously nothing is fact but it’s worth a look .

  • evonneo
    evonneo Online Community Member Posts: 31 Contributor

    My current MP is IDS so that is a non starter but is seems that Labour 's paymaster The TUC aren't happy...

    20250312_130536.jpg
  • luvpink
    luvpink Online Community Member Posts: 1,943 Championing

    The trade unions protested about the winter fuel allowance but Liebour went ahead regardless.

    They are hell bent on just refusing to listen to anyone.

  • Slonvinton
    Slonvinton Online Community Member Posts: 67 Empowering

    I cant claim to know what they will do, but if they did cut LCWRA I imagine your transistional protection of £420 would save you from it having a major impact. I dont see how it makes sense to cut LCWRA and say your transitiona protection is not moot.

  • Slonvinton
    Slonvinton Online Community Member Posts: 67 Empowering

    Damn it typos, and no option to edit, the last sentence should read "I dont see how it makes sense to cut LCWRA and say your transitional protection is now moot."

  • Maggie37
    Maggie37 Online Community Member Posts: 72 Empowering

    I’m very new to forum so please excuse if this has been discussed before. I see a bigger picture forming.. Reeves undoubtedly wants to tax the masses but this is much more palatable and acceptable if they make the disabled ‘sacrificial lambs’first.?

    Starmer.. high on ‘World statesman’ kudos WILL defend this to the death. He doesn’t just want enough money for the defence budget he wants Uber cash. They will cull the civil service and NHS England to gain their monies?

    Will it work.. er no. He’s alienated a large chunk of his previous voters. Liz Kendall was his optimal choice.. she’s right wing and should actually have ‘crossed the house’ before now. I personally think they’ve overreached. If peace comes to Ukraine, if he manages the Orange beast’s tariffs.. he can afford to slow down rearmament..why then choose this hill to die on??

    Now think of the practicalities, still high waiting lists, a complete dearth of psychiatrists in the UK, DWP staff who are hostile and demeaning to disabled people ( someone needs to access their WhatsApp groups by the way!!)… He’s going to find it nigh impossible to progress legislation. I’d go with deaths of disabled people by suicide( there are stats abounding), I’d challenge figures, there are benefits NOT being claimed.. despite entitlement plus the fact that his own mother was apparently disabled for many years🤷‍♀️

  • Ironside1990
    Ironside1990 Online Community Member Posts: 310 Empowering
This discussion has been closed.