Is this discrimination?
Hi, I'm looking for some advice. I am a TA in a primary school and because my sons special needs school has been closed since March because of Covid-19 I have been unable to work on a rota system. I was on full pay until 20th June but then was told by my employer that I needed to make a choice, either come back to work on the rota or take unpaid leave. I took this to my union as I felt this was unfair as I cannot be furloughed due to the government giving schools extra money to keep on their staff. After taking it to HR I was told via my union that they do not have to pay me. So for the last month of term I will go unpaid. I feel I have been discriminated against by my employer for having a son with Special needs who needs my constant care and attention. I also feel that because I would not be pressured into returning to work I have been peanalised for putting my son first.
Can I take this further? Can I seek legal advice?
Any advice is appreciated.
Can I take this further? Can I seek legal advice?
Any advice is appreciated.
0
Comments
-
I don't think it is. They are paying you to not be there. I know you need to be home with your kid, but is it possible you could get a carer for him while you go to work?0
-
I doubt this is discrimination, it sounds a bit too specific and maybe an isolated case.
Personally I see people threatening to and taking legal action as more destructive than helpful. I keep running into problems getting help because as soon as someone makes a mistake they cover it up and refuse to help me, presumably in case something else goes wrong. Damages for normal life actions are more an American idea and seems to have more to do with becoming rich rather than helping sort out the systems supposedly in place.
TK1 -
As you are a TA and need to work, there should be provision for your son, just like there was provision for health care workers during the lock-down stage. Their children still went to school. What provision is your son's school making for children of care workers?0
-
Hi and welcome to the community, your union and HR are correct they have a legal obligation to allow you time off for dependants but this is only a temporary measure in order to find suitable child care also they do not have any requirement to pay you for any time off allowed.
The fact they are allowing you to take unpaid leave would be classed as reasonable and would not be discriminatory.
It would only be discrimination if they were treating you differently to other employees I suggest you ask for a copy of the time off for dependants policy and this should clarify their procedures0 -
Hi @lallal, how are things going? I imagine this has been tough!
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 14.1K Start here and say hello!
- 6.8K Coffee lounge
- 66 Games den
- 1.6K People power
- 96 Community noticeboard
- 21.9K Talk about life
- 5K Everyday life
- 52 Current affairs
- 2.2K Families and carers
- 820 Education and skills
- 1.8K Work
- 435 Money and bills
- 3.4K Housing and independent living
- 885 Transport and travel
- 652 Relationships
- 61 Sex and intimacy
- 1.3K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.3K Talk about your impairment
- 845 Rare, invisible, and undiagnosed conditions
- 893 Neurological impairments and pain
- 1.9K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.1K Autism and neurodiversity
- 35.5K Talk about your benefits
- 5.6K Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
- 18.4K PIP, DLA, and AA
- 6.5K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5K Benefits and income