Green Paper Discussion - includes accessible formats and consultation event sign up links!
Comments
-
And it's for those reasons it shouldn't happen ellen clifford doing fund raising maybe to take them on ? I'd have to rent a room even though I'm not allowed to what choice anyway I really can't see thousands on streets I believe something will happen on the legal side as much as labour wants this it's goes against everything The Equality Act but the way they done all this is sick and very sinister but remember there is thousands on pip so that means thousands will fight against this maybe alot going on in background
1 -
Yes, but for how long will it remain voluntary? I am worried that all benefits will soon come with mandatory engagement with work coaches attached.
2 -
Someone quoted it a few posts up.
Basically it says for fit and healthy a massive clamp down, but for those on health related benefits the only change would be all assessments are face to face and increased intensity. Nothing about descriptors, eligibility changes.
1 -
The user and all related content has been deleted.2
-
-
I was thinking the same
0 -
How will that effect them I'm not clued up on all of this
0 -
Its just so worrying all this being kept in limbo and naturally assuming the worse.
Fear of the unknown is making me feel extremely despondent.
I try to keep myself busy and focus on other things but yesterday and today I have been stuck home alone because the weather has been horrendous, cold rain and wind and these stupid reforms are playing heavily on my mind.
3 -
PasserbyPosts: 145 Empowering2:30PMYes. The DWP's "Connect to Work" program does not require new primary or secondary legislation. The program is being delivered through existing authority of the Secretary of State, which has the legal power to issue grants or fund initiatives under section 2 of the Employment and Training Act 1973."Connect to Work" falls under the DWP's existing responsibilities and operational framework, and thus doesn't need any additional law to be rolled out.Connect to Work is OK, as it's based upon voluntary engagementThe original Pathways to Work was launched in 2008. Then Work Programme. Work Choice and more. Welfare-to-Work ideology since Invalidity Benefit was discontinued continues to this day.
The schemes are voluntary until JCP decides to refer the 'customer' on a mandatory basis. I know because it happened to me and more than once. DWP is a law unto itself.
1 -
They don't know whether to treat us like children - pocket money and knowing better than we do what's good for us - or liars and thieves trying to cheat the system.
0 -
I honestly believe inmates in prison are treated with more respect and dignity than us.
2 -
It's the council elections in May Catherine.
0 -
2
-
It is an emotional rollercoaster I was in tears to my doctor like yourself trying keep busy forgetting what day it is getting confused it's evil but they don't care we thinking he cares about his reputation yes he does but not for us for his elite associates we have had months of attacks making us all more sicker cruel tiring but we have to keep going and hope and pray 🙏 they won't get thier sick wish I said to doctor pls give me sedative he said no want to stop thinking I hope you have a peaceful night big hugs
1 -
Yes I believe charles does have to sign it , but i don't think he can not sign . He has to sign it , I might be wrong .
0 -
we will own nothing and be happy . New world order being played out .
0 -
face to face won't work for me I am agoraphobic and cannot look people in the eye , I cannot mix with new people .
0 -
This might help, hope it sort of answers your question!!
✅ Does King Charles III have to sign off on parliamentary legislation?
Yes—but more precisely, this is what's called Royal Assent. It's the final formal step for a bill to become law after it's been approved by both Houses of Parliament (Commons and Lords).
❌ Can he refuse to give Royal Assent?
In theory, yes. But in practice, no. This is one of those areas where constitutional monarchy and democratic tradition meet.
- The last time a monarch refused Royal Assent was in 1708, when Queen Anne vetoed a bill.
- Since then, Royal Assent has been a ceremonial duty. It's given automatically on the advice of ministers.
- If King Charles III were to refuse assent, it would provoke a huge constitutional crisis, as it would go against centuries of democratic precedent.
👑 TL;DR:
- He must give Royal Assent for a bill to become law.
- He can’t realistically refuse it, even if he disagrees with the policy—it would break with modern democratic norms.
1 -
Your absolutely right so sad when we really look and see what they been doing to us
1 -
Had me in tears what a guy thanks for sharing
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 16K Start here and say hello!
- 7.6K Coffee lounge
- 111 Games den
- 1.8K People power
- 172 Announcements and information
- 25.5K Talk about life
- 6.2K Everyday life
- 507 Current affairs
- 2.5K Families and carers
- 880 Education and skills
- 2K Work
- 589 Money and bills
- 3.7K Housing and independent living
- 1.2K Transport and travel
- 649 Relationships
- 1.6K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.5K Talk about your impairment
- 883 Rare, invisible, & undiagnosed conditions
- 942 Neurological impairments and pain
- 2.2K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.3K Autism and neurodiversity
- 41.1K Talk about your benefits
- 6.2K Employment & Support Allowance (ESA)
- 20.4K PIP, DLA, ADP & AA
- 9.2K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.3K Benefits and income