Green Paper Discussion (from 24th March, 2025)

1202123252645

Comments

  • charlie72
    charlie72 Community Member Posts: 259 Pioneering
  • jul1aorways
    jul1aorways Community Member Posts: 394 Pioneering

    I've just signed this very important petition on change.org about the stopping the new 4 point PIP rule. It has just been bought to my attention by @charlie72

    I was dismayed though by the fact that so few had signed it! 😳

    COME ON PEOPLE!!! We can do better than this. 😊 👍

    PLEASE SIGN AND SHARE!!!

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    Good morning,

    I just read in the guardian that the green paper will be put to the vote before the OBR can publish its impact assessment. Instead they’ll be releasing it in October as the government haven’t released enough information. Baring in mind the Tory paper failed in court partly due to only 3% of disabled would be found work surely their sneaky way around this would be also found unlawful?

  • charlie72
    charlie72 Community Member Posts: 259 Pioneering

    They might be able to put it to a vote, like all their policies, rushed and ill thought out. Let them do it and make same mistakes tories did. You might find this interesting though!!

    1. Green Papers Are Consultative – A Green Paper is not legally binding legislation; it is a proposal for discussion. Courts generally do not intervene in policy proposals unless there is a clear legal issue, such as an unfair or unlawful consultation process.
    2. Judicial Review – If the government proceeds with policy changes based on the Green Paper without proper consideration of evidence (such as an impact assessment from the Office for Budget Responsibility), a judicial review could be brought. This would typically be on the grounds of:
      • Procedural unfairness (e.g., lack of proper consultation).
      • Irrationality (if the decision is unreasonable or lacks evidence).
      • Failure to consider key factors (e.g., ignoring financial or social impacts).
    3. Parliamentary Sovereignty – Courts are generally reluctant to interfere in parliamentary procedures unless there is a breach of constitutional principles, such as the government failing to follow its own statutory obligations.

    If a policy is later implemented without an OBR assessment and has significant negative effects, legal challenges could be stronger at that stage, particularly if claimants can demonstrate harm or procedural misconduct.

  • charlie72
    charlie72 Community Member Posts: 259 Pioneering

    Thanks for signing it, I too was a bit dismayed at how few people had signed it so far, maybe it needs sharing on social media too (I'm not on that). Everyone on here should be signing this, ir makes a difference!! Thanks.

  • jul1aorways
    jul1aorways Community Member Posts: 394 Pioneering

    @secretsquirrel1

    I've just read that article and feel rather better for doing so. I agree 100%.

    Disability Activists like Ellen Clifford and Disabled People Against Cuts are undoubtedly going to take this back to the high court as they did will the last government and succeed in getting the current green paper proposals declared as unlawful as the Tory proposals were. I'd be very surprised if they didn't succeed in this again.

    I hope you don't mind me putting in the link to the Guardian article.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/30/mps-to-vote-on-disability-benefit-cuts-without-knowing-full-impact?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

  • rach_90
    rach_90 Community Member Posts: 38 Contributor

    I’ve shared it on my Facebook feed and signed it. Hopefully others will do the same. If we get enough support it might give the government a bit of a push back, or MPs food for thought! 🤞

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    Thank you , I thought exactly this . Very interesting

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    Thank you for putting the link up , I don’t know how too 😀

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    I just watched a video on YouTube, dynamic duo, apparently a report by DPAC claims that the £4 billion of cuts is a lie and it will be £7billion possibly £9billion . Links are on the channel if anyone wants to take a look .

  • jul1aorways
    jul1aorways Community Member Posts: 394 Pioneering

    @secretsquirrel1

    You're very welcome! 😊

  • YogiBear
    YogiBear Community Member Posts: 410 Pioneering

    Saw an article on X by Peter Stefanovic saying that MP's are going to vote on disability cuts without knowing 'full impact'. This is getting more concerning.😳

  • jul1aorways
    jul1aorways Community Member Posts: 394 Pioneering

    I found this link to the Dignity Declaration in an excellent article in The Canary by Jeremy Corbyn, who is a signatory. 😊

    I've signed it myself and wondered if it would be of interest to anyone here. 🤔

    It's part of a project to get an left wing nationwide political party under way, to give people like us a proper alternative to vote for instead of elitist and right wing parties who try so hard to misrepresent us so they can take what little we have away.

    https://thedignitydeclaration.co.uk/

  • sarah_lea12
    sarah_lea12 Community Member Posts: 447 Empowering

    If half the uk are on benefits, then this hasn't been thought through .

    Everyone of us pay vat and tax on everything just the same as those working . So cutting our money off is only got to make it worse , we have no money , we don't shop etc .

    Reading some of the comments on some of the news reports are absolutely nasty, I am sure a lot of us never thought we would be disabled , so those calling us lazy scroungers should think about what they are saying , nobody knows what is around the corner , every one could end up disabled at some point .

  • sarah_lea12
    sarah_lea12 Community Member Posts: 447 Empowering

    I only watch him , I wasn't impressed with Noah she seems to think the cuts are a good thing .

  • johnnyy85
    johnnyy85 Community Member Posts: 266 Empowering

    can I ask peoples honest opinions on whether the government will actually succeed in getting this through ? And succeeding against human right challenges ?

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Community Member Posts: 2,048 Championing

    Yes absolutely I found that too . Only Noah and Phil on A different bias were all for Labour and the cuts. Now Phil has even spoken out as originally he said Labour wrote the cuts would be made solely by tackling fraud. But Noah definitely is all for the reforms. I also watch the justice journals with Alison , she used to work at dwp and took them to court .

  • gamer1
    gamer1 Community Member Posts: 81 Empowering

    Even if you have a lot of voters you have to win the constituency seats. That's why Reform only won a few seats with 4 million votes. It's not impossible but it would need a very big movement and very careful planning to win it.

  • Martinp
    Martinp Community Member Posts: 248 Empowering

    I think they will definitely get it through, I’d say 50/50 for the legal challenge

This discussion has been closed.